A field study on ice melting and breakup in a boreal lake, Pääjärvi, in Finland

<p>Lake ice melting and breakup form a fast, nonlinear process with important mechanical, chemical, and biological consequences. The process is difficult to study in the field due to safety issues, and therefore only little is known about its details. In the present work, the field data were c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Cryosphere
Main Authors: Y. Zhang, M. Fregona, J. Loehr, J. Ala-Könni, S. Song, M. Leppäranta, Z. Li
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Copernicus Publications 2023-05-01
Online Access:https://tc.copernicus.org/articles/17/2045/2023/tc-17-2045-2023.pdf
Description
Summary:<p>Lake ice melting and breakup form a fast, nonlinear process with important mechanical, chemical, and biological consequences. The process is difficult to study in the field due to safety issues, and therefore only little is known about its details. In the present work, the field data were collected on foot, by hydrocopter, and by boat for a full time series of the evolution of ice thickness, structure, and geochemistry through the melting period. The observations were made in lake Pääjärvi in 2018 (pilot study) and 2022. In 2022, the maximum thickness of ice was 55 cm with 60 % snow ice, and in 40 d the ice melted by 33 cm from the surface and 22 cm from the bottom while the porosity increased from less than 5 % to 40 %–50 % at breakup. In 2018, the snow-ice layer was thin, and bottom and internal melting dominated the ice decay. The mean melting rates were 1.31 cm d<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−1</sup></span> in 2022 and 1.55 cm d<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−1</sup></span> in 2018. In 2022 the electrical conductivity (EC) of ice was 11.4 <span class="inline-formula">±</span> 5.79 <span class="inline-formula">µ</span>S cm<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−1</sup></span>, which is 1 order of magnitude lower than in the lake water, and ice pH was 6.44 <span class="inline-formula">±</span> 0.28, which is lower by 0.4 than in water. The pH and EC of ice and water decreased during the ice decay except for slight increases in ice due to flushing by lake water. Chlorophyll <span class="inline-formula"><i>a</i></span> was less than 0.5 <span class="inline-formula">µ</span>g L<span class="inline-formula"><sup>−1</sup></span> in porous ice, approximately one-third of that in the lake water. The results are important for understanding the process of ice decay with consequences for lake ecology, further development of numerical lake ice models, and modeling the safety of ice cover and ice loads.</p>
ISSN:1994-0416
1994-0424