Comparative Analysis of Discrete Subtraction and Cross-Correlation for Subpixel Object Tracking
Many applications in physics and engineering require non-invasive, precise object tracking, which can be achieved with image processing methods at very good cost-efficiency ratios. The traditional method for measuring displacement with subpixel resolution involves cross-correlation between images an...
| 發表在: | Applied Sciences |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
| 格式: | Article |
| 語言: | 英语 |
| 出版: |
MDPI AG
2023-07-01
|
| 主題: | |
| 在線閱讀: | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/13/14/8271 |
| _version_ | 1850394794148233216 |
|---|---|
| author | Belén Ferrer María-Baralida Tomás Min Wan John T. Sheridan David Mas |
| author_facet | Belén Ferrer María-Baralida Tomás Min Wan John T. Sheridan David Mas |
| author_sort | Belén Ferrer |
| collection | DOAJ |
| container_title | Applied Sciences |
| description | Many applications in physics and engineering require non-invasive, precise object tracking, which can be achieved with image processing methods at very good cost-efficiency ratios. The traditional method for measuring displacement with subpixel resolution involves cross-correlation between images and interpolation of the correlation peak. While this method enables target tracking with a resolution of thousandths of a pixel, it is computationally intensive and susceptible to peak-locking errors. Recently, a new method based on discrete subtraction between images has been presented as an alternative to cross-correlation to improve computational efficiency, which also results in being free of peak-locking errors. This manuscript presents an experimental evaluation of the performance of the discrete subtraction method (DSM) and compares it with the cross-correlation method in terms of subpixel accuracy and deviation errors. Four different targets were used with apparent displacements as small as 0.002 px, which approaches the theoretical digital resolution limit. The results show that the discrete subtraction method is more sensitive to noise but does not suffer from peak-locking error, thus being a reliable alternative to the correlation method, mainly for calibration processes. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-d232b7de8dbb482b82c2d00a5f33bf97 |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| issn | 2076-3417 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2023-07-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| spelling | doaj-art-d232b7de8dbb482b82c2d00a5f33bf972025-08-19T22:52:36ZengMDPI AGApplied Sciences2076-34172023-07-011314827110.3390/app13148271Comparative Analysis of Discrete Subtraction and Cross-Correlation for Subpixel Object TrackingBelén Ferrer0María-Baralida Tomás1Min Wan2John T. Sheridan3David Mas4University Institute of Physics Applied to the Sciences and Technologies, University of Alicante, P.O. Box 99, 03080 Alicante, SpainUniversity Institute of Physics Applied to the Sciences and Technologies, University of Alicante, P.O. Box 99, 03080 Alicante, SpainSchool of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, College of Engineering and Architecture, University College Dublin, D04 C1P1 Dublin, IrelandSchool of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, College of Engineering and Architecture, University College Dublin, D04 C1P1 Dublin, IrelandUniversity Institute of Physics Applied to the Sciences and Technologies, University of Alicante, P.O. Box 99, 03080 Alicante, SpainMany applications in physics and engineering require non-invasive, precise object tracking, which can be achieved with image processing methods at very good cost-efficiency ratios. The traditional method for measuring displacement with subpixel resolution involves cross-correlation between images and interpolation of the correlation peak. While this method enables target tracking with a resolution of thousandths of a pixel, it is computationally intensive and susceptible to peak-locking errors. Recently, a new method based on discrete subtraction between images has been presented as an alternative to cross-correlation to improve computational efficiency, which also results in being free of peak-locking errors. This manuscript presents an experimental evaluation of the performance of the discrete subtraction method (DSM) and compares it with the cross-correlation method in terms of subpixel accuracy and deviation errors. Four different targets were used with apparent displacements as small as 0.002 px, which approaches the theoretical digital resolution limit. The results show that the discrete subtraction method is more sensitive to noise but does not suffer from peak-locking error, thus being a reliable alternative to the correlation method, mainly for calibration processes.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/13/14/8271subpixel trackingcross-correlationdiscrete subtractionimage processing |
| spellingShingle | Belén Ferrer María-Baralida Tomás Min Wan John T. Sheridan David Mas Comparative Analysis of Discrete Subtraction and Cross-Correlation for Subpixel Object Tracking subpixel tracking cross-correlation discrete subtraction image processing |
| title | Comparative Analysis of Discrete Subtraction and Cross-Correlation for Subpixel Object Tracking |
| title_full | Comparative Analysis of Discrete Subtraction and Cross-Correlation for Subpixel Object Tracking |
| title_fullStr | Comparative Analysis of Discrete Subtraction and Cross-Correlation for Subpixel Object Tracking |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Analysis of Discrete Subtraction and Cross-Correlation for Subpixel Object Tracking |
| title_short | Comparative Analysis of Discrete Subtraction and Cross-Correlation for Subpixel Object Tracking |
| title_sort | comparative analysis of discrete subtraction and cross correlation for subpixel object tracking |
| topic | subpixel tracking cross-correlation discrete subtraction image processing |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/13/14/8271 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT belenferrer comparativeanalysisofdiscretesubtractionandcrosscorrelationforsubpixelobjecttracking AT mariabaralidatomas comparativeanalysisofdiscretesubtractionandcrosscorrelationforsubpixelobjecttracking AT minwan comparativeanalysisofdiscretesubtractionandcrosscorrelationforsubpixelobjecttracking AT johntsheridan comparativeanalysisofdiscretesubtractionandcrosscorrelationforsubpixelobjecttracking AT davidmas comparativeanalysisofdiscretesubtractionandcrosscorrelationforsubpixelobjecttracking |
