A Failed Upheaval?
Opposition to the adversarial politics of the Westerminster Parliament was closely interwoven with the campaign for Scottish devolution. Upon its foundation, the initial proponents of Scottish devolution intended for the new Scottish Parliament to embrace a more consensual ‘new politics’. Evaluating...
| الحاوية / القاعدة: | Groundings |
|---|---|
| المؤلف الرئيسي: | |
| التنسيق: | مقال |
| اللغة: | الإنجليزية |
| منشور في: |
Glasgow University Union
2022-04-01
|
| الموضوعات: | |
| الوصول للمادة أونلاين: | https://journals.gla.ac.uk/groundings/article/view/150 |
| الملخص: | Opposition to the adversarial politics of the Westerminster Parliament was closely interwoven with the campaign for Scottish devolution. Upon its foundation, the initial proponents of Scottish devolution intended for the new Scottish Parliament to embrace a more consensual ‘new politics’. Evaluating the success of these aspirations through the framework of the Consultative Steering Group’s principles of power-sharing, accountability, access and participation, and equal opportunities, this essay argues that the Scottish Parliament has not delivered the ‘new politics’ expected upon its foundation.
|
|---|---|
| تدمد: | 1754-7474 1755-2702 |