A multidimensional approach to male urinary incontinence: treatment efficacy and mental health perspectives
Male urinary incontinence (UI) is a prevalent yet under-discussed condition that has a significant impact on patient quality of life and social, emotional and physical well-being. UI in men can arise as stress incontinence, urge incontinence, or mixed incontinence depending on the timing and mani...
| Published in: | Journal of Men's Health |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MRE Press
2024-08-01
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://oss.jomh.org/files/article/20240830-346/pdf/JOMH2024040501.pdf |
| Summary: | Male urinary incontinence (UI) is a prevalent yet under-discussed condition that
has a significant impact on patient quality of life and social, emotional and
physical well-being. UI in men can arise as stress incontinence, urge
incontinence, or mixed incontinence depending on the timing and manifestation of
urinary leakage. The economic implications of UI are substantial, with UI in men
leading to billions in healthcare costs annually in the United States alone. UI
is associated with decreased quality of life and depression, particularly among
socioeconomically vulnerable populations. For men, this condition can cause
emotional and financial distress, affecting quality of life, social
reintegration, and professional activities. Addressing the mental health aspects
of UI through screening, open communication, and tailored interventions is
crucial for improving patient outcomes and quality of life. The diagnostic
process for UI begins with a thorough history and physical examination to
classify the type and severity, which dictates the treatment approach. Other
office-based diagnostic tools can help to accurately characterize symptoms and
assess impact on quality of life. For complex cases or when standard diagnostics
fail to clarify the condition, referrals to urologic specialists for advanced
testing are recommended. Conservative management is always preferred as the
first-line therapy for UI, including for stress, urge and mixed incontinence.
Medications tend to be more effective and prevalent in the management and
treatment for urge incontinence while surgical interventions are likely to give
the best outcomes for stress incontinence. Referral to a urologic specialist is
often necessitated in complex cases or for surgical treatment of UI. In this
study, we provide a comprehensive analysis of male UI, enhance understanding and
awareness of the condition, guide management practices to improve patient
outcomes, and explore the economic burden and mental health implications of UI in
men. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1875-6867 1875-6859 |
