A Review of Multi-Agent Game in Intellectual Property Pledge Financing
To promote the theoretical research and business development of intellectual property pledge financing, this paper summarizes the research status of multi-agent game in intellectual property pledge financing. At present, scholars’ research on multi-agent game in intellectual property pledge financin...
| Published in: | Journal of Risk Analysis and Crisis Response (JRACR) |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Society for Risk Analysis - China
2024-06-01
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.54560/jracr.v14i2.473 |
| _version_ | 1850041511015612416 |
|---|---|
| author | Chang Guo |
| author_facet | Chang Guo |
| author_sort | Chang Guo |
| collection | DOAJ |
| container_title | Journal of Risk Analysis and Crisis Response (JRACR) |
| description | To promote the theoretical research and business development of intellectual property pledge financing, this paper summarizes the research status of multi-agent game in intellectual property pledge financing. At present, scholars’ research on multi-agent game in intellectual property pledge financing mainly focuses on the game between borrowers and lenders, the game between lenders and third-party intermediaries (or platforms), and the game between borrowers, lenders and third-party intermediaries (or platforms). Overall, scholars have conducted extensive research on the game between borrowers and lenders, while research on the game between borrowers, lenders, and third-party intermediaries (or platforms) is relatively weak. Especially when the government implements financial subsidies and interest subsidies for borrowers, financial subsidies for third-party intermediaries (or platforms), and risk compensation for lenders, there is a lack of research on the intellectual property pledge financing game with the government as an independent game subject. Future research can focus on the game between borrowers, lenders, and the government under government incentives, as well as the game between borrowers, lenders, third-party intermediaries (or platforms) and the government under government incentives. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-d7cf97531bf840f58cd2b3a2dedebdfa |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| issn | 2210-8491 2210-8505 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-06-01 |
| publisher | Society for Risk Analysis - China |
| record_format | Article |
| spelling | doaj-art-d7cf97531bf840f58cd2b3a2dedebdfa2025-08-20T00:31:37ZengSociety for Risk Analysis - ChinaJournal of Risk Analysis and Crisis Response (JRACR)2210-84912210-85052024-06-01142-8228239https://doi.org/10.54560/jracr.v14i2.473A Review of Multi-Agent Game in Intellectual Property Pledge FinancingChang Guo0School of Applied Economics, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang (550025), Guizhou, China;Guizhou Institution for Technology Innovation & Entrepreneurship Investment, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang (550025), Guizhou, China;56166130@qq.com; Tel.: +86-0851-88510575To promote the theoretical research and business development of intellectual property pledge financing, this paper summarizes the research status of multi-agent game in intellectual property pledge financing. At present, scholars’ research on multi-agent game in intellectual property pledge financing mainly focuses on the game between borrowers and lenders, the game between lenders and third-party intermediaries (or platforms), and the game between borrowers, lenders and third-party intermediaries (or platforms). Overall, scholars have conducted extensive research on the game between borrowers and lenders, while research on the game between borrowers, lenders, and third-party intermediaries (or platforms) is relatively weak. Especially when the government implements financial subsidies and interest subsidies for borrowers, financial subsidies for third-party intermediaries (or platforms), and risk compensation for lenders, there is a lack of research on the intellectual property pledge financing game with the government as an independent game subject. Future research can focus on the game between borrowers, lenders, and the government under government incentives, as well as the game between borrowers, lenders, third-party intermediaries (or platforms) and the government under government incentives.https://doi.org/10.54560/jracr.v14i2.473intellectual propertyintellectual property pledge financingmulti-agent gameevolutionary gamesignaling gameliterature review |
| spellingShingle | Chang Guo A Review of Multi-Agent Game in Intellectual Property Pledge Financing intellectual property intellectual property pledge financing multi-agent game evolutionary game signaling game literature review |
| title | A Review of Multi-Agent Game in Intellectual Property Pledge Financing |
| title_full | A Review of Multi-Agent Game in Intellectual Property Pledge Financing |
| title_fullStr | A Review of Multi-Agent Game in Intellectual Property Pledge Financing |
| title_full_unstemmed | A Review of Multi-Agent Game in Intellectual Property Pledge Financing |
| title_short | A Review of Multi-Agent Game in Intellectual Property Pledge Financing |
| title_sort | review of multi agent game in intellectual property pledge financing |
| topic | intellectual property intellectual property pledge financing multi-agent game evolutionary game signaling game literature review |
| url | https://doi.org/10.54560/jracr.v14i2.473 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT changguo areviewofmultiagentgameinintellectualpropertypledgefinancing AT changguo reviewofmultiagentgameinintellectualpropertypledgefinancing |
