A Review of Multi-Agent Game in Intellectual Property Pledge Financing

To promote the theoretical research and business development of intellectual property pledge financing, this paper summarizes the research status of multi-agent game in intellectual property pledge financing. At present, scholars’ research on multi-agent game in intellectual property pledge financin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Risk Analysis and Crisis Response (JRACR)
Main Author: Chang Guo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Society for Risk Analysis - China 2024-06-01
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.54560/jracr.v14i2.473
_version_ 1850041511015612416
author Chang Guo
author_facet Chang Guo
author_sort Chang Guo
collection DOAJ
container_title Journal of Risk Analysis and Crisis Response (JRACR)
description To promote the theoretical research and business development of intellectual property pledge financing, this paper summarizes the research status of multi-agent game in intellectual property pledge financing. At present, scholars’ research on multi-agent game in intellectual property pledge financing mainly focuses on the game between borrowers and lenders, the game between lenders and third-party intermediaries (or platforms), and the game between borrowers, lenders and third-party intermediaries (or platforms). Overall, scholars have conducted extensive research on the game between borrowers and lenders, while research on the game between borrowers, lenders, and third-party intermediaries (or platforms) is relatively weak. Especially when the government implements financial subsidies and interest subsidies for borrowers, financial subsidies for third-party intermediaries (or platforms), and risk compensation for lenders, there is a lack of research on the intellectual property pledge financing game with the government as an independent game subject. Future research can focus on the game between borrowers, lenders, and the government under government incentives, as well as the game between borrowers, lenders, third-party intermediaries (or platforms) and the government under government incentives.
format Article
id doaj-art-d7cf97531bf840f58cd2b3a2dedebdfa
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2210-8491
2210-8505
language English
publishDate 2024-06-01
publisher Society for Risk Analysis - China
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-d7cf97531bf840f58cd2b3a2dedebdfa2025-08-20T00:31:37ZengSociety for Risk Analysis - ChinaJournal of Risk Analysis and Crisis Response (JRACR)2210-84912210-85052024-06-01142-8228239https://doi.org/10.54560/jracr.v14i2.473A Review of Multi-Agent Game in Intellectual Property Pledge FinancingChang Guo0School of Applied Economics, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang (550025), Guizhou, China;Guizhou Institution for Technology Innovation & Entrepreneurship Investment, Guizhou University of Finance and Economics, Guiyang (550025), Guizhou, China;56166130@qq.com; Tel.: +86-0851-88510575To promote the theoretical research and business development of intellectual property pledge financing, this paper summarizes the research status of multi-agent game in intellectual property pledge financing. At present, scholars’ research on multi-agent game in intellectual property pledge financing mainly focuses on the game between borrowers and lenders, the game between lenders and third-party intermediaries (or platforms), and the game between borrowers, lenders and third-party intermediaries (or platforms). Overall, scholars have conducted extensive research on the game between borrowers and lenders, while research on the game between borrowers, lenders, and third-party intermediaries (or platforms) is relatively weak. Especially when the government implements financial subsidies and interest subsidies for borrowers, financial subsidies for third-party intermediaries (or platforms), and risk compensation for lenders, there is a lack of research on the intellectual property pledge financing game with the government as an independent game subject. Future research can focus on the game between borrowers, lenders, and the government under government incentives, as well as the game between borrowers, lenders, third-party intermediaries (or platforms) and the government under government incentives.https://doi.org/10.54560/jracr.v14i2.473intellectual propertyintellectual property pledge financingmulti-agent gameevolutionary gamesignaling gameliterature review
spellingShingle Chang Guo
A Review of Multi-Agent Game in Intellectual Property Pledge Financing
intellectual property
intellectual property pledge financing
multi-agent game
evolutionary game
signaling game
literature review
title A Review of Multi-Agent Game in Intellectual Property Pledge Financing
title_full A Review of Multi-Agent Game in Intellectual Property Pledge Financing
title_fullStr A Review of Multi-Agent Game in Intellectual Property Pledge Financing
title_full_unstemmed A Review of Multi-Agent Game in Intellectual Property Pledge Financing
title_short A Review of Multi-Agent Game in Intellectual Property Pledge Financing
title_sort review of multi agent game in intellectual property pledge financing
topic intellectual property
intellectual property pledge financing
multi-agent game
evolutionary game
signaling game
literature review
url https://doi.org/10.54560/jracr.v14i2.473
work_keys_str_mv AT changguo areviewofmultiagentgameinintellectualpropertypledgefinancing
AT changguo reviewofmultiagentgameinintellectualpropertypledgefinancing