Investigating Interaural Frequency-Place Mismatches via Bimodal Vowel Integration

For patients having residual hearing in one ear and a cochlear implant (CI) in the opposite ear, interaural place-pitch mismatches might be partly responsible for the large variability in individual benefit. Behavioral pitch-matching between the two ears has been suggested as a way to individualize...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Trends in Hearing
Main Authors: François Guérit, Sébastien Santurette, Josef Chalupper, Torsten Dau
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2014-11-01
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216514560590
_version_ 1856965530099908608
author François Guérit
Sébastien Santurette
Josef Chalupper
Torsten Dau
author_facet François Guérit
Sébastien Santurette
Josef Chalupper
Torsten Dau
author_sort François Guérit
collection DOAJ
container_title Trends in Hearing
description For patients having residual hearing in one ear and a cochlear implant (CI) in the opposite ear, interaural place-pitch mismatches might be partly responsible for the large variability in individual benefit. Behavioral pitch-matching between the two ears has been suggested as a way to individualize the fitting of the frequency-to-electrode map but is rather tedious and unreliable. Here, an alternative method using two-formant vowels was developed and tested. The interaural spectral shift was inferred by comparing vowel spaces, measured by presenting the first formant (F1) to the nonimplanted ear and the second (F2) on either side. The method was first evaluated with eight normal-hearing listeners and vocoder simulations, before being tested with 11 CI users. Average vowel distributions across subjects showed a similar pattern when presenting F2 on either side, suggesting acclimatization to the frequency map. However, individual vowel spaces with F2 presented to the implant did not allow a reliable estimation of the interaural mismatch. These results suggest that interaural frequency-place mismatches can be derived from such vowel spaces. However, the method remains limited by difficulties in bimodal fusion of the two formants.
format Article
id doaj-art-da1bdaba0103432eb43e2df2fa93d665
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2331-2165
language English
publishDate 2014-11-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-da1bdaba0103432eb43e2df2fa93d6652025-08-19T20:02:18ZengSAGE PublishingTrends in Hearing2331-21652014-11-011810.1177/233121651456059010.1177_2331216514560590Investigating Interaural Frequency-Place Mismatches via Bimodal Vowel IntegrationFrançois Guérit0Sébastien Santurette1Josef Chalupper2Torsten Dau3Hearing Systems, Department of Electrical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, DenmarkHearing Systems, Department of Electrical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, DenmarkAdvanced Bionics European Research Center GmbH, Hanover, GermanyHearing Systems, Department of Electrical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, DenmarkFor patients having residual hearing in one ear and a cochlear implant (CI) in the opposite ear, interaural place-pitch mismatches might be partly responsible for the large variability in individual benefit. Behavioral pitch-matching between the two ears has been suggested as a way to individualize the fitting of the frequency-to-electrode map but is rather tedious and unreliable. Here, an alternative method using two-formant vowels was developed and tested. The interaural spectral shift was inferred by comparing vowel spaces, measured by presenting the first formant (F1) to the nonimplanted ear and the second (F2) on either side. The method was first evaluated with eight normal-hearing listeners and vocoder simulations, before being tested with 11 CI users. Average vowel distributions across subjects showed a similar pattern when presenting F2 on either side, suggesting acclimatization to the frequency map. However, individual vowel spaces with F2 presented to the implant did not allow a reliable estimation of the interaural mismatch. These results suggest that interaural frequency-place mismatches can be derived from such vowel spaces. However, the method remains limited by difficulties in bimodal fusion of the two formants.https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216514560590
spellingShingle François Guérit
Sébastien Santurette
Josef Chalupper
Torsten Dau
Investigating Interaural Frequency-Place Mismatches via Bimodal Vowel Integration
title Investigating Interaural Frequency-Place Mismatches via Bimodal Vowel Integration
title_full Investigating Interaural Frequency-Place Mismatches via Bimodal Vowel Integration
title_fullStr Investigating Interaural Frequency-Place Mismatches via Bimodal Vowel Integration
title_full_unstemmed Investigating Interaural Frequency-Place Mismatches via Bimodal Vowel Integration
title_short Investigating Interaural Frequency-Place Mismatches via Bimodal Vowel Integration
title_sort investigating interaural frequency place mismatches via bimodal vowel integration
url https://doi.org/10.1177/2331216514560590
work_keys_str_mv AT francoisguerit investigatinginterauralfrequencyplacemismatchesviabimodalvowelintegration
AT sebastiensanturette investigatinginterauralfrequencyplacemismatchesviabimodalvowelintegration
AT josefchalupper investigatinginterauralfrequencyplacemismatchesviabimodalvowelintegration
AT torstendau investigatinginterauralfrequencyplacemismatchesviabimodalvowelintegration