Genomics, Endoscopy, and Control of Gastroesophageal Cancers: A PerspectiveSummary

In The Cancer Genome Atlas the goals were to define how to treat advanced cancers with targeted therapy. However, the challenges facing cancer interception for early detection and prevention include length bias in which current screening and surveillance approaches frequently miss rapidly progressin...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Main Author: Brian J. Reid
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2017-05-01
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352345X1730036X
_version_ 1852819906370732032
author Brian J. Reid
author_facet Brian J. Reid
author_sort Brian J. Reid
collection DOAJ
container_title Cellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology
description In The Cancer Genome Atlas the goals were to define how to treat advanced cancers with targeted therapy. However, the challenges facing cancer interception for early detection and prevention include length bias in which current screening and surveillance approaches frequently miss rapidly progressing cancers that then present at advanced stages in the clinic with symptoms (underdiagnosis). In contrast, many early detection strategies detect benign conditions that may never progress to cancer during a lifetime, and the patient dies of unrelated causes (overdiagnosis). This challenge to cancer interception is believed to be due to the speed at which the neoplasm evolves, called length bias sampling; rapidly progressing cancers are missed by current early detection strategies. In contrast, slowly or non-progressing cancers or their precursors are selectively detected. This has led to the concept of cancer interception, which can be defined as active interception of a biological process that drives cancer development before the patient presents in the clinic with an advanced, symptomatic cancer. The solutions needed to advance strategies for cancer interception require assessing the rate at which the cancer evolves over time and space. This is an essential challenge that needs to be addressed by robust study designs including normal and non-progressing controls when known to be appropriate. Keywords: Barrett's Esophagus, Biomarkers, Chromosome Aberrations, Esophageal Neoplasms, Gastroesophageal Reflux, Genomic Instability, Genomics, Stomach
format Article
id doaj-art-da1caf833e2c497db7b3fc17c4eec425
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2352-345X
language English
publishDate 2017-05-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-da1caf833e2c497db7b3fc17c4eec4252025-08-19T20:32:39ZengElsevierCellular and Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology2352-345X2017-05-013335936610.1016/j.jcmgh.2017.02.005Genomics, Endoscopy, and Control of Gastroesophageal Cancers: A PerspectiveSummaryBrian J. Reid0Correspondence Address correspondence to: Brian J. Reid, MD, PhD, 1100 Fairview Avenue N, C1-157, PO Box 19024, Seattle, Washington 98109-1024. fax: (206) 667-6192.; Divisions of Human Biology and Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington; Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WashingtonIn The Cancer Genome Atlas the goals were to define how to treat advanced cancers with targeted therapy. However, the challenges facing cancer interception for early detection and prevention include length bias in which current screening and surveillance approaches frequently miss rapidly progressing cancers that then present at advanced stages in the clinic with symptoms (underdiagnosis). In contrast, many early detection strategies detect benign conditions that may never progress to cancer during a lifetime, and the patient dies of unrelated causes (overdiagnosis). This challenge to cancer interception is believed to be due to the speed at which the neoplasm evolves, called length bias sampling; rapidly progressing cancers are missed by current early detection strategies. In contrast, slowly or non-progressing cancers or their precursors are selectively detected. This has led to the concept of cancer interception, which can be defined as active interception of a biological process that drives cancer development before the patient presents in the clinic with an advanced, symptomatic cancer. The solutions needed to advance strategies for cancer interception require assessing the rate at which the cancer evolves over time and space. This is an essential challenge that needs to be addressed by robust study designs including normal and non-progressing controls when known to be appropriate. Keywords: Barrett's Esophagus, Biomarkers, Chromosome Aberrations, Esophageal Neoplasms, Gastroesophageal Reflux, Genomic Instability, Genomics, Stomachhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352345X1730036X
spellingShingle Brian J. Reid
Genomics, Endoscopy, and Control of Gastroesophageal Cancers: A PerspectiveSummary
title Genomics, Endoscopy, and Control of Gastroesophageal Cancers: A PerspectiveSummary
title_full Genomics, Endoscopy, and Control of Gastroesophageal Cancers: A PerspectiveSummary
title_fullStr Genomics, Endoscopy, and Control of Gastroesophageal Cancers: A PerspectiveSummary
title_full_unstemmed Genomics, Endoscopy, and Control of Gastroesophageal Cancers: A PerspectiveSummary
title_short Genomics, Endoscopy, and Control of Gastroesophageal Cancers: A PerspectiveSummary
title_sort genomics endoscopy and control of gastroesophageal cancers a perspectivesummary
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352345X1730036X
work_keys_str_mv AT brianjreid genomicsendoscopyandcontrolofgastroesophagealcancersaperspectivesummary