Polemik Salakanagara: Meninjau Kebenaran Bukti Historis Salakanagara dalam Pentas Sejarah Kuno di Indonesia

This study aims to analyze historical evidence and the views of the Banten people towards the existence of the Salakanagara Hindu kingdom. The research method used is a historical method covering 4 stages, namely heuristics, verification, interpretation, and historiography which is supported by a c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Diakronika
Main Author: Wildhan Ichzha Maulana
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Jurusan Sejarah Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Universitas Negeri Padang 2023-06-01
Subjects:
Online Access:http://diakronika.ppj.unp.ac.id/index.php/diakronika/article/view/334
_version_ 1850418482245533696
author Wildhan Ichzha Maulana
author_facet Wildhan Ichzha Maulana
author_sort Wildhan Ichzha Maulana
collection DOAJ
container_title Diakronika
description This study aims to analyze historical evidence and the views of the Banten people towards the existence of the Salakanagara Hindu kingdom. The research method used is a historical method covering 4 stages, namely heuristics, verification, interpretation, and historiography which is supported by a correspondence theory framework to explore the historical truth of Salakanagara based on the support of objective facts in the form of written sources and archaeological remains. The results of this study indicate that (1) the historical facts of Salakanagara are not supported by strong primary historical sources such as findings of inscriptions, archaeological remains, literary works, and contemporary foreign chronicles. (2) The historical facts of the new Salakanagara are based on the Wangsakerta manuscript whose validity is still widely doubted, then myths and legends, in which the three incidentally are secondary historical sources. (3) The majority of Bantenese people believe that Salakanagara was once founded, but this view arises from attribution to historical sources which are less valid and relevant. Therefore, Salakanagara's studies are still limited to historical hypotheses, because they are only supported by the truth from secondary historical sources. However, it also does not rule out the possibility that stronger primary historical sources are found in its development so that the historical facts of Salakanagara can be legally recognized.
format Article
id doaj-art-db6fbc8bdcd14fca842ff0780975b0cb
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 1411-1764
2620-9446
language English
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher Jurusan Sejarah Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Universitas Negeri Padang
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-db6fbc8bdcd14fca842ff0780975b0cb2025-08-19T22:44:00ZengJurusan Sejarah Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Universitas Negeri PadangDiakronika1411-17642620-94462023-06-0123110.24036/diakronika/vol23-iss1/334334Polemik Salakanagara: Meninjau Kebenaran Bukti Historis Salakanagara dalam Pentas Sejarah Kuno di IndonesiaWildhan Ichzha Maulana0Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta This study aims to analyze historical evidence and the views of the Banten people towards the existence of the Salakanagara Hindu kingdom. The research method used is a historical method covering 4 stages, namely heuristics, verification, interpretation, and historiography which is supported by a correspondence theory framework to explore the historical truth of Salakanagara based on the support of objective facts in the form of written sources and archaeological remains. The results of this study indicate that (1) the historical facts of Salakanagara are not supported by strong primary historical sources such as findings of inscriptions, archaeological remains, literary works, and contemporary foreign chronicles. (2) The historical facts of the new Salakanagara are based on the Wangsakerta manuscript whose validity is still widely doubted, then myths and legends, in which the three incidentally are secondary historical sources. (3) The majority of Bantenese people believe that Salakanagara was once founded, but this view arises from attribution to historical sources which are less valid and relevant. Therefore, Salakanagara's studies are still limited to historical hypotheses, because they are only supported by the truth from secondary historical sources. However, it also does not rule out the possibility that stronger primary historical sources are found in its development so that the historical facts of Salakanagara can be legally recognized. http://diakronika.ppj.unp.ac.id/index.php/diakronika/article/view/334Salakanegara; Naskah Wangsakerta; Sejarah Kuno; Indonesia
spellingShingle Wildhan Ichzha Maulana
Polemik Salakanagara: Meninjau Kebenaran Bukti Historis Salakanagara dalam Pentas Sejarah Kuno di Indonesia
Salakanegara; Naskah Wangsakerta; Sejarah Kuno; Indonesia
title Polemik Salakanagara: Meninjau Kebenaran Bukti Historis Salakanagara dalam Pentas Sejarah Kuno di Indonesia
title_full Polemik Salakanagara: Meninjau Kebenaran Bukti Historis Salakanagara dalam Pentas Sejarah Kuno di Indonesia
title_fullStr Polemik Salakanagara: Meninjau Kebenaran Bukti Historis Salakanagara dalam Pentas Sejarah Kuno di Indonesia
title_full_unstemmed Polemik Salakanagara: Meninjau Kebenaran Bukti Historis Salakanagara dalam Pentas Sejarah Kuno di Indonesia
title_short Polemik Salakanagara: Meninjau Kebenaran Bukti Historis Salakanagara dalam Pentas Sejarah Kuno di Indonesia
title_sort polemik salakanagara meninjau kebenaran bukti historis salakanagara dalam pentas sejarah kuno di indonesia
topic Salakanegara; Naskah Wangsakerta; Sejarah Kuno; Indonesia
url http://diakronika.ppj.unp.ac.id/index.php/diakronika/article/view/334
work_keys_str_mv AT wildhanichzhamaulana polemiksalakanagarameninjaukebenaranbuktihistorissalakanagaradalampentassejarahkunodiindonesia