Mentalizing in the context of Mentzos’ dilemma–on the use of implicit work in the treatment of non-affective psychosis

Current approaches to the treatment of non-affective psychosis include elements of mentalization-based treatment and the potential in enhancing mentalizing capacity in this patient group has been widely emphasized. This article presents the “psychotic identity dilemma”, a concept by Stavros Mentzos,...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in Psychiatry
Main Authors: Anna-Lena Bröcker, Dorothea von Haebler, Günter Lempa, Christiane Montag
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-07-01
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1229113/full
_version_ 1851838188128043008
author Anna-Lena Bröcker
Dorothea von Haebler
Dorothea von Haebler
Günter Lempa
Christiane Montag
author_facet Anna-Lena Bröcker
Dorothea von Haebler
Dorothea von Haebler
Günter Lempa
Christiane Montag
author_sort Anna-Lena Bröcker
collection DOAJ
container_title Frontiers in Psychiatry
description Current approaches to the treatment of non-affective psychosis include elements of mentalization-based treatment and the potential in enhancing mentalizing capacity in this patient group has been widely emphasized. This article presents the “psychotic identity dilemma”, a concept by Stavros Mentzos, and a therapeutic approach considering this concept as a valuable complementary addition to these treatments. The idea of a dilemma between closeness and distance, which in itself cannot be represented mentally at first, helps to respond to specific needs of patients with psychotic disorders by placing the treatment focus on fundamental interpersonal processes. Following this train of thought, this article attempts to shed light on the importance of the “real relationship” between therapist and patient as well as the exploration of the “here and now”, especially at the beginning of psychotherapeutic treatment. Two treatment modes are suggested, one characterized by the experience of interpersonality within the therapeutic relationship and a second one characterized by the reflection of interpersonal phenomena. These modes are framed by Stavros Mentzos’ concept of an identity dilemma. We describe how mentalizing first needs to be addressed implicitly in a tolerable, exemplary relationship in which closeness and distance are regulated based on the therapist’s countertransference, then explicitly. A series of interventions are described, which allow for moments of shared attention, promote intentionality and contingency and, later in the course of therapy, help to integrate experiences into narratives.
format Article
id doaj-art-decf31c7a68b4b67b4ce0853c3028fa1
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 1664-0640
language English
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-decf31c7a68b4b67b4ce0853c3028fa12025-08-19T22:29:32ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychiatry1664-06402023-07-011410.3389/fpsyt.2023.12291131229113Mentalizing in the context of Mentzos’ dilemma–on the use of implicit work in the treatment of non-affective psychosisAnna-Lena Bröcker0Dorothea von Haebler1Dorothea von Haebler2Günter Lempa3Christiane Montag4Department of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Campus Charité Mitte, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, GermanyDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Campus Charité Mitte, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, GermanyInternational Psychoanalytic University Berlin, Berlin, GermanyPsychotherapy Practice, Munich, GermanyDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurosciences, Campus Charité Mitte, Charité–Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, GermanyCurrent approaches to the treatment of non-affective psychosis include elements of mentalization-based treatment and the potential in enhancing mentalizing capacity in this patient group has been widely emphasized. This article presents the “psychotic identity dilemma”, a concept by Stavros Mentzos, and a therapeutic approach considering this concept as a valuable complementary addition to these treatments. The idea of a dilemma between closeness and distance, which in itself cannot be represented mentally at first, helps to respond to specific needs of patients with psychotic disorders by placing the treatment focus on fundamental interpersonal processes. Following this train of thought, this article attempts to shed light on the importance of the “real relationship” between therapist and patient as well as the exploration of the “here and now”, especially at the beginning of psychotherapeutic treatment. Two treatment modes are suggested, one characterized by the experience of interpersonality within the therapeutic relationship and a second one characterized by the reflection of interpersonal phenomena. These modes are framed by Stavros Mentzos’ concept of an identity dilemma. We describe how mentalizing first needs to be addressed implicitly in a tolerable, exemplary relationship in which closeness and distance are regulated based on the therapist’s countertransference, then explicitly. A series of interventions are described, which allow for moments of shared attention, promote intentionality and contingency and, later in the course of therapy, help to integrate experiences into narratives.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1229113/fullmentalizingmetacognitionpsychosisschizophreniadilemmaimplicit
spellingShingle Anna-Lena Bröcker
Dorothea von Haebler
Dorothea von Haebler
Günter Lempa
Christiane Montag
Mentalizing in the context of Mentzos’ dilemma–on the use of implicit work in the treatment of non-affective psychosis
mentalizing
metacognition
psychosis
schizophrenia
dilemma
implicit
title Mentalizing in the context of Mentzos’ dilemma–on the use of implicit work in the treatment of non-affective psychosis
title_full Mentalizing in the context of Mentzos’ dilemma–on the use of implicit work in the treatment of non-affective psychosis
title_fullStr Mentalizing in the context of Mentzos’ dilemma–on the use of implicit work in the treatment of non-affective psychosis
title_full_unstemmed Mentalizing in the context of Mentzos’ dilemma–on the use of implicit work in the treatment of non-affective psychosis
title_short Mentalizing in the context of Mentzos’ dilemma–on the use of implicit work in the treatment of non-affective psychosis
title_sort mentalizing in the context of mentzos dilemma on the use of implicit work in the treatment of non affective psychosis
topic mentalizing
metacognition
psychosis
schizophrenia
dilemma
implicit
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1229113/full
work_keys_str_mv AT annalenabrocker mentalizinginthecontextofmentzosdilemmaontheuseofimplicitworkinthetreatmentofnonaffectivepsychosis
AT dorotheavonhaebler mentalizinginthecontextofmentzosdilemmaontheuseofimplicitworkinthetreatmentofnonaffectivepsychosis
AT dorotheavonhaebler mentalizinginthecontextofmentzosdilemmaontheuseofimplicitworkinthetreatmentofnonaffectivepsychosis
AT gunterlempa mentalizinginthecontextofmentzosdilemmaontheuseofimplicitworkinthetreatmentofnonaffectivepsychosis
AT christianemontag mentalizinginthecontextofmentzosdilemmaontheuseofimplicitworkinthetreatmentofnonaffectivepsychosis