Brood parasitism and egg recognition in three bunting hosts of the cuckoos

Abstract Comparative studies of egg recognition and rejection between various sympatric hosts provide insight into the coevolutionary history of the hosts and parasites, as well as the degree of antagonism between the species. Although buntings are widely considered to be a suitable host taxon for c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecology and Evolution
Main Authors: Yuhan Zhang, Guo Zhong, Guixia Wan, Longwu Wang, Wei Liang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-10-01
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10659
_version_ 1851888040625045504
author Yuhan Zhang
Guo Zhong
Guixia Wan
Longwu Wang
Wei Liang
author_facet Yuhan Zhang
Guo Zhong
Guixia Wan
Longwu Wang
Wei Liang
author_sort Yuhan Zhang
collection DOAJ
container_title Ecology and Evolution
description Abstract Comparative studies of egg recognition and rejection between various sympatric hosts provide insight into the coevolutionary history of the hosts and parasites, as well as the degree of antagonism between the species. Although buntings are widely considered to be a suitable host taxon for cuckoos, there has been relatively little research on this example of parasitism and host antiparasitic behaviour. Here we provided the first report on brood parasitism and egg recognition in three sympatric ground‐nesting bunting hosts of the common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus), namely the yellow‐throated bunting (Emberiza elegans), south rock bunting (E. yunnanensis), and crested bunting (E. lathami). The results show that for the five breeding seasons during 2018–2022, the parasitism rate by common cuckoos was 0.87% and 0.45% in yellow‐throated buntings and south rock buntings, respectively, whereas the parasitism rate by an unidentified parasite was 4% during 2018–2023 in the crested bunting. The rejection rates of the three bunting hosts for blue non‐mimetic eggs were 89.3%, 88.9%, and 100% for yellow‐throated buntings, south rock buntings, and crested buntings, respectively. The rejection rates for red non‐mimetic eggs by yellow‐throated buntings and south rock buntings were lower at 76.9% and 82.4%, respectively. All three sympatric bunting hosts examined had high levels of egg recognition and egg rejection, suggesting that it may have been subjected to high parasitic history and that egg recognition ability was retained after the loss of parasitism, which needs to be further verified by future experiments.
format Article
id doaj-art-dfc692efaaee412b98c21bba8cd4aa22
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2045-7758
language English
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-dfc692efaaee412b98c21bba8cd4aa222025-08-19T22:10:50ZengWileyEcology and Evolution2045-77582023-10-011310n/an/a10.1002/ece3.10659Brood parasitism and egg recognition in three bunting hosts of the cuckoosYuhan Zhang0Guo Zhong1Guixia Wan2Longwu Wang3Wei Liang4Ministry of Education Key Laboratory for Ecology of Tropical Islands, College of Life Sciences Hainan Normal University Haikou ChinaMinistry of Education Key Laboratory for Ecology of Tropical Islands, College of Life Sciences Hainan Normal University Haikou ChinaSchool of Life Sciences Guizhou Normal University Guiyang ChinaSchool of Life Sciences Guizhou Normal University Guiyang ChinaMinistry of Education Key Laboratory for Ecology of Tropical Islands, College of Life Sciences Hainan Normal University Haikou ChinaAbstract Comparative studies of egg recognition and rejection between various sympatric hosts provide insight into the coevolutionary history of the hosts and parasites, as well as the degree of antagonism between the species. Although buntings are widely considered to be a suitable host taxon for cuckoos, there has been relatively little research on this example of parasitism and host antiparasitic behaviour. Here we provided the first report on brood parasitism and egg recognition in three sympatric ground‐nesting bunting hosts of the common cuckoo (Cuculus canorus), namely the yellow‐throated bunting (Emberiza elegans), south rock bunting (E. yunnanensis), and crested bunting (E. lathami). The results show that for the five breeding seasons during 2018–2022, the parasitism rate by common cuckoos was 0.87% and 0.45% in yellow‐throated buntings and south rock buntings, respectively, whereas the parasitism rate by an unidentified parasite was 4% during 2018–2023 in the crested bunting. The rejection rates of the three bunting hosts for blue non‐mimetic eggs were 89.3%, 88.9%, and 100% for yellow‐throated buntings, south rock buntings, and crested buntings, respectively. The rejection rates for red non‐mimetic eggs by yellow‐throated buntings and south rock buntings were lower at 76.9% and 82.4%, respectively. All three sympatric bunting hosts examined had high levels of egg recognition and egg rejection, suggesting that it may have been subjected to high parasitic history and that egg recognition ability was retained after the loss of parasitism, which needs to be further verified by future experiments.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10659arms racebrood parasitismbuntingcommon cuckooegg recognitionground‐nesting birds
spellingShingle Yuhan Zhang
Guo Zhong
Guixia Wan
Longwu Wang
Wei Liang
Brood parasitism and egg recognition in three bunting hosts of the cuckoos
arms race
brood parasitism
bunting
common cuckoo
egg recognition
ground‐nesting birds
title Brood parasitism and egg recognition in three bunting hosts of the cuckoos
title_full Brood parasitism and egg recognition in three bunting hosts of the cuckoos
title_fullStr Brood parasitism and egg recognition in three bunting hosts of the cuckoos
title_full_unstemmed Brood parasitism and egg recognition in three bunting hosts of the cuckoos
title_short Brood parasitism and egg recognition in three bunting hosts of the cuckoos
title_sort brood parasitism and egg recognition in three bunting hosts of the cuckoos
topic arms race
brood parasitism
bunting
common cuckoo
egg recognition
ground‐nesting birds
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10659
work_keys_str_mv AT yuhanzhang broodparasitismandeggrecognitioninthreebuntinghostsofthecuckoos
AT guozhong broodparasitismandeggrecognitioninthreebuntinghostsofthecuckoos
AT guixiawan broodparasitismandeggrecognitioninthreebuntinghostsofthecuckoos
AT longwuwang broodparasitismandeggrecognitioninthreebuntinghostsofthecuckoos
AT weiliang broodparasitismandeggrecognitioninthreebuntinghostsofthecuckoos