<it>In vivo</it> chronic myocardial infarction characterization by spin locked cardiovascular magnetic resonance
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Late gadolinium enhanced (LGE) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is frequently used to evaluate myocardial viability, estimate total infarct size and transmurality, but is not always straightforward is and contraindicated in pa...
| Published in: | Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2012-06-01
|
| Online Access: | http://www.jcmr-online.com/content/14/1/37 |
| _version_ | 1850424558701510656 |
|---|---|
| author | Witschey Walter RT Zsido Gerald A Koomalsingh Kevin Kondo Norihiro Minakawa Masahito Shuto Takashi McGarvey Jeremy R Levack Melissa M Contijoch Francisco Pilla James J Gorman Joseph H Gorman Robert C |
| author_facet | Witschey Walter RT Zsido Gerald A Koomalsingh Kevin Kondo Norihiro Minakawa Masahito Shuto Takashi McGarvey Jeremy R Levack Melissa M Contijoch Francisco Pilla James J Gorman Joseph H Gorman Robert C |
| author_sort | Witschey Walter RT |
| collection | DOAJ |
| container_title | Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance |
| description | <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Late gadolinium enhanced (LGE) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is frequently used to evaluate myocardial viability, estimate total infarct size and transmurality, but is not always straightforward is and contraindicated in patients with renal failure because of the risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. T2- and T1-weighted CMR alone is however relatively insensitive to chronic myocardial infarction (MI) in the absence of a contrast agent. The objective of this manuscript is to explore T1ρ-weighted rotating frame CMR techniques for infarct characterization without contrast agents. We hypothesize that T1ρ CMR accurately measures infarct size in chronic MI on account of a large change in T1ρ relaxation time between scar and myocardium.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>7Yorkshire swine underwent CMR at 8 weeks post-surgical induction of apical or posterolateral myocardial infarction. Late gadolinium enhanced and T1ρ CMR were performed at high resolution to visualize MI. T1ρ-weighted imaging was performed with a B<sub>1</sub> = 500 Hz spin lock pulse on a 3 T clinical MR scanner. Following sacrifice, the heart was excised and infarct size was calculated by optical planimetry. Infarct size was calculated for all three methods (LGE, T1ρ and planimetry) and statistical analysis was performed. T1ρ relaxation time maps were computed from multiple T1ρ-weighted images at varying spin lock duration.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Mean infarct contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in LGE and T1ρ CMR was 2.8 ± 0.1 and 2.7 ± 0.1. The variation in signal intensity of tissues was found to be, in order of decreasing signal intensity, LV blood, fat and edema, infarct and healthy myocardium. Infarct size measured by T1ρ CMR (21.1% ± 1.4%) was not significantly different from LGE CMR (22.2% ± 1.5%) or planimetry (21.1% ± 2.7%; p < 0.05).T1ρ relaxation times were T1ρ<sub>infarct</sub> = 91.7 ms in the infarct and T1ρ<sub>remote</sub> = 47.2 ms in the remote myocardium.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>T1ρ-weighted imaging using long spin locking pulses enables high discrimination between infarct and myocardium. T1ρ CMR may be useful to visualizing MI without the need for exogenous contrast agents for a wide range of clinical cardiac applications such as to distinguish edema and scar tissue and tissue characterization of myocarditis and ventricular fibrosis.</p> |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e037ff1079d14652b2caa9d0af2bfbd2 |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| issn | 1097-6647 1532-429X |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2012-06-01 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | Article |
| spelling | doaj-art-e037ff1079d14652b2caa9d0af2bfbd22025-08-19T22:41:14ZengElsevierJournal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance1097-66471532-429X2012-06-011413710.1186/1532-429X-14-37<it>In vivo</it> chronic myocardial infarction characterization by spin locked cardiovascular magnetic resonanceWitschey Walter RTZsido Gerald AKoomalsingh KevinKondo NorihiroMinakawa MasahitoShuto TakashiMcGarvey Jeremy RLevack Melissa MContijoch FranciscoPilla James JGorman Joseph HGorman Robert C<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Late gadolinium enhanced (LGE) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is frequently used to evaluate myocardial viability, estimate total infarct size and transmurality, but is not always straightforward is and contraindicated in patients with renal failure because of the risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. T2- and T1-weighted CMR alone is however relatively insensitive to chronic myocardial infarction (MI) in the absence of a contrast agent. The objective of this manuscript is to explore T1ρ-weighted rotating frame CMR techniques for infarct characterization without contrast agents. We hypothesize that T1ρ CMR accurately measures infarct size in chronic MI on account of a large change in T1ρ relaxation time between scar and myocardium.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>7Yorkshire swine underwent CMR at 8 weeks post-surgical induction of apical or posterolateral myocardial infarction. Late gadolinium enhanced and T1ρ CMR were performed at high resolution to visualize MI. T1ρ-weighted imaging was performed with a B<sub>1</sub> = 500 Hz spin lock pulse on a 3 T clinical MR scanner. Following sacrifice, the heart was excised and infarct size was calculated by optical planimetry. Infarct size was calculated for all three methods (LGE, T1ρ and planimetry) and statistical analysis was performed. T1ρ relaxation time maps were computed from multiple T1ρ-weighted images at varying spin lock duration.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Mean infarct contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in LGE and T1ρ CMR was 2.8 ± 0.1 and 2.7 ± 0.1. The variation in signal intensity of tissues was found to be, in order of decreasing signal intensity, LV blood, fat and edema, infarct and healthy myocardium. Infarct size measured by T1ρ CMR (21.1% ± 1.4%) was not significantly different from LGE CMR (22.2% ± 1.5%) or planimetry (21.1% ± 2.7%; p < 0.05).T1ρ relaxation times were T1ρ<sub>infarct</sub> = 91.7 ms in the infarct and T1ρ<sub>remote</sub> = 47.2 ms in the remote myocardium.</p> <p>Conclusions</p> <p>T1ρ-weighted imaging using long spin locking pulses enables high discrimination between infarct and myocardium. T1ρ CMR may be useful to visualizing MI without the need for exogenous contrast agents for a wide range of clinical cardiac applications such as to distinguish edema and scar tissue and tissue characterization of myocarditis and ventricular fibrosis.</p>http://www.jcmr-online.com/content/14/1/37 |
| spellingShingle | Witschey Walter RT Zsido Gerald A Koomalsingh Kevin Kondo Norihiro Minakawa Masahito Shuto Takashi McGarvey Jeremy R Levack Melissa M Contijoch Francisco Pilla James J Gorman Joseph H Gorman Robert C <it>In vivo</it> chronic myocardial infarction characterization by spin locked cardiovascular magnetic resonance |
| title | <it>In vivo</it> chronic myocardial infarction characterization by spin locked cardiovascular magnetic resonance |
| title_full | <it>In vivo</it> chronic myocardial infarction characterization by spin locked cardiovascular magnetic resonance |
| title_fullStr | <it>In vivo</it> chronic myocardial infarction characterization by spin locked cardiovascular magnetic resonance |
| title_full_unstemmed | <it>In vivo</it> chronic myocardial infarction characterization by spin locked cardiovascular magnetic resonance |
| title_short | <it>In vivo</it> chronic myocardial infarction characterization by spin locked cardiovascular magnetic resonance |
| title_sort | it in vivo it chronic myocardial infarction characterization by spin locked cardiovascular magnetic resonance |
| url | http://www.jcmr-online.com/content/14/1/37 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT witscheywalterrt itinvivoitchronicmyocardialinfarctioncharacterizationbyspinlockedcardiovascularmagneticresonance AT zsidogeralda itinvivoitchronicmyocardialinfarctioncharacterizationbyspinlockedcardiovascularmagneticresonance AT koomalsinghkevin itinvivoitchronicmyocardialinfarctioncharacterizationbyspinlockedcardiovascularmagneticresonance AT kondonorihiro itinvivoitchronicmyocardialinfarctioncharacterizationbyspinlockedcardiovascularmagneticresonance AT minakawamasahito itinvivoitchronicmyocardialinfarctioncharacterizationbyspinlockedcardiovascularmagneticresonance AT shutotakashi itinvivoitchronicmyocardialinfarctioncharacterizationbyspinlockedcardiovascularmagneticresonance AT mcgarveyjeremyr itinvivoitchronicmyocardialinfarctioncharacterizationbyspinlockedcardiovascularmagneticresonance AT levackmelissam itinvivoitchronicmyocardialinfarctioncharacterizationbyspinlockedcardiovascularmagneticresonance AT contijochfrancisco itinvivoitchronicmyocardialinfarctioncharacterizationbyspinlockedcardiovascularmagneticresonance AT pillajamesj itinvivoitchronicmyocardialinfarctioncharacterizationbyspinlockedcardiovascularmagneticresonance AT gormanjosephh itinvivoitchronicmyocardialinfarctioncharacterizationbyspinlockedcardiovascularmagneticresonance AT gormanrobertc itinvivoitchronicmyocardialinfarctioncharacterizationbyspinlockedcardiovascularmagneticresonance |
