Phraseological units with the semantics of “evil” in Russian and Kyrgyz languages

INTRODUCTION. The basic ethical idea of evil, which comes into opposition with good, is noted in human communities in different historical eras and in different cultures, which is reflected in such a linguistic unit as phraseology, which takes place in the vocabulary of a native speaker of any langu...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Неофилология
Main Author: A. K. Orozova
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Derzhavin Tambov State University 2025-03-01
Subjects:
Online Access:https://neophilology.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/559
_version_ 1848669385185558528
author A. K. Orozova
author_facet A. K. Orozova
author_sort A. K. Orozova
collection DOAJ
container_title Неофилология
description INTRODUCTION. The basic ethical idea of evil, which comes into opposition with good, is noted in human communities in different historical eras and in different cultures, which is reflected in such a linguistic unit as phraseology, which takes place in the vocabulary of a native speaker of any language. The purpose of the study is to present the results of a comparative analysis of Russian and Kyrgyz phraseological units with semantics of “evil”, to reveal the national and cultural specifics of the concept “evil” as an ethnically significant idea of the moral character of a person.MATERIALS AND METHODS. The research material is lexicographic sources and a card index compiled by the author based on observations of spontaneous speech and phrase use in live speech of speakers of Russian and Kyrgyz languages. Methods of continuous sampling of factual material, definition, and comparison are used; The main method is descriptive and analytical.RESULTS AND DISCUSSION. An analysis of the phraseological units of the Russian and Kyrgyz languages with the semantics of ruthlessness, cruelty and malice showed that they reflect not only the emotional aspects of human nature, but also the characteristics of cultures. The Kyrgyz language makes extensive use of artifacts such as “sword”, “whip”, “blood”, and “poison”, which convey complex human feelings and moral vices. To express negative qualities, somatic phraseological units are used; in the Russian language, phraseological units with zoonims predominate, objectifying the national traits themselves and linguistic and cultural significance. Phraseologisms with the semantics of the image of an evil person in the compared languages are characterized by a metaphorical component that reflects the nationally specific nature of native speakers.CONCLUSION. The analysis of phraseological units with the meaning of “evil” in Russian and Kyrgyz languages has revealed the influence of cultural characteristics on their semantics, imagery, and structure, reflecting the specifics of perceiving negative traits in each culture. The results of the study emphasize the importance of examining phraseological units to gain a deeper understanding of the historical and social experience of peoples, their mentality, and values. A promising direction for further research is the expansion of comparative analysis to include other languages and cultures in order to explore the universal and unique aspects of the perception of evil.
format Article
id doaj-art-e06b60cc94d547be92e08596c682e7ad
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2587-6953
2782-5868
language English
publishDate 2025-03-01
publisher Derzhavin Tambov State University
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-e06b60cc94d547be92e08596c682e7ad2025-10-28T09:12:49ZengDerzhavin Tambov State UniversityНеофилология2587-69532782-58682025-03-0111118319310.20310/2587-6953-2025-11-1-183-193617Phraseological units with the semantics of “evil” in Russian and Kyrgyz languagesA. K. Orozova0Ala-Too International UniversityINTRODUCTION. The basic ethical idea of evil, which comes into opposition with good, is noted in human communities in different historical eras and in different cultures, which is reflected in such a linguistic unit as phraseology, which takes place in the vocabulary of a native speaker of any language. The purpose of the study is to present the results of a comparative analysis of Russian and Kyrgyz phraseological units with semantics of “evil”, to reveal the national and cultural specifics of the concept “evil” as an ethnically significant idea of the moral character of a person.MATERIALS AND METHODS. The research material is lexicographic sources and a card index compiled by the author based on observations of spontaneous speech and phrase use in live speech of speakers of Russian and Kyrgyz languages. Methods of continuous sampling of factual material, definition, and comparison are used; The main method is descriptive and analytical.RESULTS AND DISCUSSION. An analysis of the phraseological units of the Russian and Kyrgyz languages with the semantics of ruthlessness, cruelty and malice showed that they reflect not only the emotional aspects of human nature, but also the characteristics of cultures. The Kyrgyz language makes extensive use of artifacts such as “sword”, “whip”, “blood”, and “poison”, which convey complex human feelings and moral vices. To express negative qualities, somatic phraseological units are used; in the Russian language, phraseological units with zoonims predominate, objectifying the national traits themselves and linguistic and cultural significance. Phraseologisms with the semantics of the image of an evil person in the compared languages are characterized by a metaphorical component that reflects the nationally specific nature of native speakers.CONCLUSION. The analysis of phraseological units with the meaning of “evil” in Russian and Kyrgyz languages has revealed the influence of cultural characteristics on their semantics, imagery, and structure, reflecting the specifics of perceiving negative traits in each culture. The results of the study emphasize the importance of examining phraseological units to gain a deeper understanding of the historical and social experience of peoples, their mentality, and values. A promising direction for further research is the expansion of comparative analysis to include other languages and cultures in order to explore the universal and unique aspects of the perception of evil.https://neophilology.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/559phraseological unitssemanticsevilrussian phraseological unitskyrgyz phraseological unitssomatic phraseological unitsnational culture
spellingShingle A. K. Orozova
Phraseological units with the semantics of “evil” in Russian and Kyrgyz languages
phraseological units
semantics
evil
russian phraseological units
kyrgyz phraseological units
somatic phraseological units
national culture
title Phraseological units with the semantics of “evil” in Russian and Kyrgyz languages
title_full Phraseological units with the semantics of “evil” in Russian and Kyrgyz languages
title_fullStr Phraseological units with the semantics of “evil” in Russian and Kyrgyz languages
title_full_unstemmed Phraseological units with the semantics of “evil” in Russian and Kyrgyz languages
title_short Phraseological units with the semantics of “evil” in Russian and Kyrgyz languages
title_sort phraseological units with the semantics of evil in russian and kyrgyz languages
topic phraseological units
semantics
evil
russian phraseological units
kyrgyz phraseological units
somatic phraseological units
national culture
url https://neophilology.elpub.ru/jour/article/view/559
work_keys_str_mv AT akorozova phraseologicalunitswiththesemanticsofevilinrussianandkyrgyzlanguages