Ethical limits and suggestions for improving the use of AI in scientific research, academic publishing, and the peer review process, based on deontological and consequentialist viewpoints

Abstract This study provides a comprehensive analysis of researchers' perspectives on AI integration across theoretical and practical research, academic publishing, and its future role, highlighting ethical considerations shaping its adoption. The methodology used a mixed approach, using a ques...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Discover Education
Main Author:	Mohammed Daoudi
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	Springer 2025-07-01
Subjects:	Artificial Intelligence Ethical boundaries Scientific research Academic publishing Peer review
Online Access:	https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-025-00696-z

Similar Items

Peer review vs Publish all – Navigating the changing landscape of scientific publication
by: Mariette Pretorius
Published: (2024-05-01)

Challenges Facing Scientific Publishing in the Field of Earth & Space Sciences
by: AGU Editorial Network
Published: (2024-08-01)

Scientific criticism. A plea for continuous and open peer review
by: Edward Vigmond, et al.
Published: (2025-09-01)

Scientific and Publishing Activities of National Libraries of Poland
by: Dubas Tetiana
Published: (2023-01-01)

Reviewing Peer Review
by: Barry London
Published: (2021-08-01)

The FAIR framework: ethical hybrid peer review
by: Grünebaum Amos, et al.
Published: (2025-10-01)

What does scientific publishing in public health mean?
by: Paolo Vineis
Published: (2022-11-01)

AI in scientific writing and publishing: A call for critical engagement
by: Sophia Frangou, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01)

AI in the Editorial Office: From Artificial Narrow to General Intelligence in Scientific Publishing
by: Hakan Özdemir, et al.
Published: (2025-10-01)

An emerging consensus for open evaluation: 18 visions for the future of scientific publishing
by: Nikolaus eKriegeskorte, et al.
Published: (2012-11-01)

Scientific publishing in the SPSTL SB RAS: the first decade of the XXI century
by: N. V. Vishnyakova
Published: (2011-06-01)

Review of Peer review: Reform and Renewal in Scientific Publishing
by: Sarah Rose Fitzgerald
Published: (2018-05-01)

Historiography of Scientific Publishing across Cultures and Disciplines
by: Bharat Hosur, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01)

Individual integrity and public morality in scientific publishing
by: Sergio Della-Sala
Published: (2022-05-01)

Building Relationships With the Library Publishing Coalition Peer Mentorship Program
by: Ally Laird, et al.
Published: (2023-08-01)

Implementing a "publish, then review" model of publishing
by: Michael B Eisen, et al.
Published: (2020-12-01)

Peer-review process in journals dealing with chemistry and related subjects published in Serbia
by: Dekanski Aleksandar, et al.
Published: (2016-01-01)

How to Write and Publish a Scientific Article?
by: Mahmut Taha Ölçücü, et al.
Published: (2018-06-01)

Reading in the book “Scientific Documentation: A Guide to Scientific Publishing
Published: (2020-08-01)

Burden and characteristics of unsolicited emails from medical/scientific journals, conferences, and webinars to faculty and trainees at an academic pathology department
by: Matthew D Krasowski, et al.
Published: (2019-01-01)

Openwashing and greenwashing in academic publishing
by: Mirjam Broersma
Published: (2024-07-01)

Keep calm and carry on: moral panic, predatory publishers, peer review, and the emperor’s new clothes
by: Frank Houghton
Published: (2022-04-01)

We can shift academic culture through publishing choices [version 1; referees: 1 approved, 2 approved with reservations]
by: Corina J Logan
Published: (2017-04-01)

Making the most of peer review
by: Nikolai Slavov
Published: (2015-11-01)

Research Writing, Peer Review and Academic Publishing
by: Ponn P. Mahayosnand
Published: (2024-04-01)

Ensuring the Systematic Entry of Scientific and Publishing Activities of NAS of Ukraine Into Digital Scientific Communications
by: Vakarenko Olena
Published: (2020-01-01)

The Importance of Single Source Publishing in Scientific Publishing
by: Antoine Fauchié, et al.
Published: (2023-10-01)

Reviewing manuscripts for scientific journals: recommendations for early career scientists
by: Diego A. Forero, et al.
Published: (2025-01-01)

Peer review without gatekeeping
by: Michael B Eisen, et al.
Published: (2022-10-01)

Decentralising scientific publishing: can the blockchain improve science communication?
by: Flávio Codeço Coelho, et al.

Publishing in the time of COVID-19
by: Michael B Eisen, et al.
Published: (2020-03-01)

Book publishing activity of scientific and educational institutions in the Republic of Tyva: modern problems
by: M. S. Oorzhak
Published: (2016-03-01)

The commodification of academic publishing – Relevance to cancer palliative care literature
by: Arunangshu Ghoshal
Published: (2023-01-01)

How and why eLife selects papers for peer review
by: eLife Editorial Leadership, et al.
Published: (2024-07-01)

Editorial bullying: an exploration of acts impacting publication ethics and related environment
by: Fawad Javed, et al.
Published: (2024-02-01)

All publishers are predatory - some are bigger than others
by: OLAVO B. AMARAL
Published: (2018-05-01)

Interactive Open Access Publishing and Peer Review: The Effectiveness and Perspectives of Transparency and Self-Regulation in Scientific Communication and Evaluation
by: Ulrich Poschl
Published: (2010-02-01)

The use of ChatGPT in scientific publishing
by: Paulo José Fortes Villas Boas, et al.
Published: (2023-08-01)

Navigating the waters of academic publishing: Insights from a graduate writing course
by: Andres Marrugo
Published: (2023-12-01)

Publishing Croatian scientific journals: to e- or not to e-?
by: Ivana Hebrang Grgić
Published: (2015-07-01)