Variations in cosmic ray cutoff rigidities during the March 8–11, 2012 magnetic storm (CAWSES II period)

The geomagnetic cutoff rigidity of cosmic rays (CRs) is the main factor regulating the arrival of CR particles at a given point on Earth's surface or inside the magnetosphere. To study the relationship between cutoffs and near-Earth space parameters, we have selected the strongest magnetic stor...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Solar-Terrestrial Physics
Main Authors: Danilova O. A., Ptitsyna N. G., Tyasto M. I., Sdobnov V. E.
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: INFRA-M 2023-06-01
Subjects:
Online Access:https://naukaru.ru/en/nauka/article/57297/view
_version_ 1850292122878476288
author Danilova O. A.
Ptitsyna N. G.
Tyasto M. I.
Sdobnov V. E.
author_facet Danilova O. A.
Ptitsyna N. G.
Tyasto M. I.
Sdobnov V. E.
author_sort Danilova O. A.
collection DOAJ
container_title Solar-Terrestrial Physics
description The geomagnetic cutoff rigidity of cosmic rays (CRs) is the main factor regulating the arrival of CR particles at a given point on Earth's surface or inside the magnetosphere. To study the relationship between cutoffs and near-Earth space parameters, we have selected the strongest magnetic storm that occurred on March 8–11, 2012 during the CAWSES-II interval, recommended by SCOSTEP for detailed studies of solar-terrestrial relations. We have found the geomagnetic cutoffs by two methods: 1) by trajectory calculations in the magnetic field of the perturbed magnetosphere according to the Ts01 model and 2) by the spectrographic global survey method according to the data from the world network of neutron monitors. The largest drop in the cutoffs (−1.1 GV) obtained by the latter method was observed during the recovery phase of the storm. Apparently, this is due to the influence of the supersubstorms that occurred at that time. The analysis has shown that the closest connection of variations in the cutoffs can be traced with the geomagnetic activity index Dst, which indicates the determining contribution of the ring current to the transport of CRs. In addition, we have found a significant connection with the electromagnetic field parameters (with the Bz component of the interplanetary magnetic field and the azimuthal component of the electric field Ey). The dynamic solar wind parameters practically do not control variations in CR geomagnetic cutoff rigidities.
format Article
id doaj-art-e0f2dbc79d3b4d62bbaa4e589bb98ca4
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2500-0535
language English
publishDate 2023-06-01
publisher INFRA-M
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-e0f2dbc79d3b4d62bbaa4e589bb98ca42025-08-19T23:34:52ZengINFRA-MSolar-Terrestrial Physics2500-05352023-06-0192869310.12737/szf-92202310Variations in cosmic ray cutoff rigidities during the March 8–11, 2012 magnetic storm (CAWSES II period)Danilova O. A.0Ptitsyna N. G.1Tyasto M. I.2Sdobnov V. E.3Institute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere, and Radio Wave Propagation, St. Petersburg Branch, RAS, St. Petersburg, RussiaInstitute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere, and Radio Wave Propagation, St. Petersburg Branch, RAS, St. Petersburg, RussiaInstitute of Terrestrial Magnetism, Ionosphere, and Radio Wave Propagation, St. Petersburg Branch, RAS, St. Petersburg, RussiaInstitute of Solar-Terrestrial Physics SB RAS Irkutsk, RussiaThe geomagnetic cutoff rigidity of cosmic rays (CRs) is the main factor regulating the arrival of CR particles at a given point on Earth's surface or inside the magnetosphere. To study the relationship between cutoffs and near-Earth space parameters, we have selected the strongest magnetic storm that occurred on March 8–11, 2012 during the CAWSES-II interval, recommended by SCOSTEP for detailed studies of solar-terrestrial relations. We have found the geomagnetic cutoffs by two methods: 1) by trajectory calculations in the magnetic field of the perturbed magnetosphere according to the Ts01 model and 2) by the spectrographic global survey method according to the data from the world network of neutron monitors. The largest drop in the cutoffs (−1.1 GV) obtained by the latter method was observed during the recovery phase of the storm. Apparently, this is due to the influence of the supersubstorms that occurred at that time. The analysis has shown that the closest connection of variations in the cutoffs can be traced with the geomagnetic activity index Dst, which indicates the determining contribution of the ring current to the transport of CRs. In addition, we have found a significant connection with the electromagnetic field parameters (with the Bz component of the interplanetary magnetic field and the azimuthal component of the electric field Ey). The dynamic solar wind parameters practically do not control variations in CR geomagnetic cutoff rigidities.https://naukaru.ru/en/nauka/article/57297/viewgeomagnetic thresholdcosmic rayssupersubstorminterplanetary magnetic fieldgeomagnetic activity
spellingShingle Danilova O. A.
Ptitsyna N. G.
Tyasto M. I.
Sdobnov V. E.
Variations in cosmic ray cutoff rigidities during the March 8–11, 2012 magnetic storm (CAWSES II period)
geomagnetic threshold
cosmic rays
supersubstorm
interplanetary magnetic field
geomagnetic activity
title Variations in cosmic ray cutoff rigidities during the March 8–11, 2012 magnetic storm (CAWSES II period)
title_full Variations in cosmic ray cutoff rigidities during the March 8–11, 2012 magnetic storm (CAWSES II period)
title_fullStr Variations in cosmic ray cutoff rigidities during the March 8–11, 2012 magnetic storm (CAWSES II period)
title_full_unstemmed Variations in cosmic ray cutoff rigidities during the March 8–11, 2012 magnetic storm (CAWSES II period)
title_short Variations in cosmic ray cutoff rigidities during the March 8–11, 2012 magnetic storm (CAWSES II period)
title_sort variations in cosmic ray cutoff rigidities during the march 8 11 2012 magnetic storm cawses ii period
topic geomagnetic threshold
cosmic rays
supersubstorm
interplanetary magnetic field
geomagnetic activity
url https://naukaru.ru/en/nauka/article/57297/view
work_keys_str_mv AT danilovaoa variationsincosmicraycutoffrigiditiesduringthemarch8112012magneticstormcawsesiiperiod
AT ptitsynang variationsincosmicraycutoffrigiditiesduringthemarch8112012magneticstormcawsesiiperiod
AT tyastomi variationsincosmicraycutoffrigiditiesduringthemarch8112012magneticstormcawsesiiperiod
AT sdobnovve variationsincosmicraycutoffrigiditiesduringthemarch8112012magneticstormcawsesiiperiod