Performance of Oral Cavity Sensors: A Systematic Review
Technological advancements are enabling new applications within biomedical engineering. As a connection point between the outer environment and the human system, the oral cavity offers unique opportunities for sensing technologies. This paper systematically reviews the performance of measurement sys...
| 发表在: | Sensors |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , |
| 格式: | 文件 |
| 语言: | 英语 |
| 出版: |
MDPI AG
2023-01-01
|
| 主题: | |
| 在线阅读: | https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/2/588 |
| _version_ | 1850130876825862144 |
|---|---|
| author | Leonardo de Almeida e Bueno Man Ting Kwong Jeroen H. M. Bergmann |
| author_facet | Leonardo de Almeida e Bueno Man Ting Kwong Jeroen H. M. Bergmann |
| author_sort | Leonardo de Almeida e Bueno |
| collection | DOAJ |
| container_title | Sensors |
| description | Technological advancements are enabling new applications within biomedical engineering. As a connection point between the outer environment and the human system, the oral cavity offers unique opportunities for sensing technologies. This paper systematically reviews the performance of measurement systems tested in the human oral cavity. Performance was defined by metrics related to accuracy and agreement estimation. A comprehensive search identifying human studies that reported on the accuracy or agreement of intraoral sensors found 85 research papers. Most of the literature (62%) was in dentistry, followed by neurology (21%), and physical medicine and rehabilitation (12%). The remaining papers were on internal medicine, obstetrics, and aerospace medicine. Most of the studies applied force or pressure sensors (32%), while optical and image sensors were applied most widely across fields. The main challenges for future adoption include the lack of large human trials, the maturity of emerging technologies (e.g., biochemical sensors), and the absence of standardization of evaluation in specific fields. New research should aim to employ robust performance metrics to evaluate their systems and incorporate real-world evidence as part of the evaluation process. Oral cavity sensors offer the potential for applications in healthcare and wellbeing, but for many technologies, more research is needed. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e162d4e789574a4fb43bbbed7b899c39 |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| issn | 1424-8220 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2023-01-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| spelling | doaj-art-e162d4e789574a4fb43bbbed7b899c392025-08-19T23:52:47ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202023-01-0123258810.3390/s23020588Performance of Oral Cavity Sensors: A Systematic ReviewLeonardo de Almeida e Bueno0Man Ting Kwong1Jeroen H. M. Bergmann2Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PJ, UKGuy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, St. Thomas’ Hospital, Westminster Bridge Rd., London SE1 7EH, UKDepartment of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3PJ, UKTechnological advancements are enabling new applications within biomedical engineering. As a connection point between the outer environment and the human system, the oral cavity offers unique opportunities for sensing technologies. This paper systematically reviews the performance of measurement systems tested in the human oral cavity. Performance was defined by metrics related to accuracy and agreement estimation. A comprehensive search identifying human studies that reported on the accuracy or agreement of intraoral sensors found 85 research papers. Most of the literature (62%) was in dentistry, followed by neurology (21%), and physical medicine and rehabilitation (12%). The remaining papers were on internal medicine, obstetrics, and aerospace medicine. Most of the studies applied force or pressure sensors (32%), while optical and image sensors were applied most widely across fields. The main challenges for future adoption include the lack of large human trials, the maturity of emerging technologies (e.g., biochemical sensors), and the absence of standardization of evaluation in specific fields. New research should aim to employ robust performance metrics to evaluate their systems and incorporate real-world evidence as part of the evaluation process. Oral cavity sensors offer the potential for applications in healthcare and wellbeing, but for many technologies, more research is needed.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/2/588intraoralmeasurementbiosensorsbiomedical monitoringmouth |
| spellingShingle | Leonardo de Almeida e Bueno Man Ting Kwong Jeroen H. M. Bergmann Performance of Oral Cavity Sensors: A Systematic Review intraoral measurement biosensors biomedical monitoring mouth |
| title | Performance of Oral Cavity Sensors: A Systematic Review |
| title_full | Performance of Oral Cavity Sensors: A Systematic Review |
| title_fullStr | Performance of Oral Cavity Sensors: A Systematic Review |
| title_full_unstemmed | Performance of Oral Cavity Sensors: A Systematic Review |
| title_short | Performance of Oral Cavity Sensors: A Systematic Review |
| title_sort | performance of oral cavity sensors a systematic review |
| topic | intraoral measurement biosensors biomedical monitoring mouth |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/23/2/588 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT leonardodealmeidaebueno performanceoforalcavitysensorsasystematicreview AT mantingkwong performanceoforalcavitysensorsasystematicreview AT jeroenhmbergmann performanceoforalcavitysensorsasystematicreview |
