Time-dependent pharmacodynamics of amikacin on Mycobacterium abscessus growth and resistance emergence

• الحاوية / القاعدة: Microbiology Spectrum
• المؤلفون الرئيسيون: Joy E. Gibson, Nishant Nandanwar, Michael N. Neely
• التنسيق: مقال
• اللغة: الإنجليزية
• منشور في: American Society for Microbiology 2024-02-01
• الموضوعات: amikacin; aminoglycosides; Mycobacterium abscessus; NTM; pharmacokinetics; pharmacodynamics
• الوصول للمادة أونلاين: https://journals.asm.org/doi/10.1128/spectrum.03222-23

ABSTRACTMycobacterium abscessus pulmonary disease is increasing in prevalence globally, particularly for individuals with cystic fibrosis. These infections are challenging to treat due to a high rate of resistance. Amikacin is critical to treatment, but the development of toxicity, amikacin resistance, and treatment failure are significant challenges. Amikacin has been characterized previously as peak-dependent and extended-interval dosing is commonly used. In our hollow fiber infection model of M. abscessus, amikacin exhibited time-dependent rather than the expected peak-dependent pharmacodynamics. Humanized amikacin exposures with more frequent, short-interval dosing (continuous infusion or every 12 hours) yielded improved microbiological response compared to extended-interval dosing (every 24 hours or 1–3 times per week). Short-interval dosing inhibited growth with a mean (SD) maximum Δlog10 colony forming units of −4.06 (0.52), significantly more than extended-interval dosing (P = 0.0013) every 24 hours, −2.40 (0.58), or 1–3 times per week, −2.39 (0.38). Growth recovery, an indicator of resistance emergence, occurred at 6.56 (0.70) days with short-interval dosing but was significantly earlier with extended-interval dosing (P = 0.0032) every 24 hours, 3.88 (0.85) days, and 1–3 times per week, 3.27 (1.72) days. Microbiological response correlated best with the pharmacodynamic index of %T > minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), with an EC80 for growth inhibition of ~40%T > MIC. We used a previously published population model of amikacin to determine the probability of achieving 40%T > MIC and show that current dosing strategies are far below this target, which may partially explain why treatment failure remains so high for these infections. These data support a cautious approach to infrequent amikacin dosing for the treatment of M. abscessus.IMPORTANCEPulmonary disease caused by Mycobacterium abscessus complex (MABSC) is increasing worldwide, particularly in patients with cystic fibrosis. MABSC is challenging to treat due to high levels of antibiotic resistance. Treatment requires 2–4 antibiotics over more than 12 months and has a significant risk of toxicity but still fails to eradicate infection in over 50% of patients with cystic fibrosis. Antibiotic dosing strategies have been largely informed by common bacteria such as Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The “pharmacodynamic” effects of amikacin, a backbone of MABSC treatment, were thought to be related to maximum “peak” drug concentration, leading to daily or three times weekly dosing. However, we found that amikacin MABSC kill and growth recovery, an indicator of antibiotic resistance, are dependent on how long amikacin concentrations are above the minimum inhibitory concentration, not how high the peak concentration is. Therefore, we recommend a re-evaluation of amikacin dosing to determine if increased frequency can improve efficacy.