Nomogram for predicting invasive lung adenocarcinoma in small solitary pulmonary nodules

BackgroundThis study aimed to construct a clinical prediction model and nomogram to differentiate invasive from non-invasive pulmonary adenocarcinoma in solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs).MethodWe analyzed computed tomography and clinical features as well as preoperative biomarkers in 1,106 patients...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in Oncology
Main Authors: Mengchao Xue, Rongyang Li, Junjie Liu, Ming Lu, Zhenyi Li, Huiying Zhang, Hui Tian
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2024-07-01
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2024.1334504/full
_version_ 1850105892325818368
author Mengchao Xue
Rongyang Li
Junjie Liu
Ming Lu
Zhenyi Li
Huiying Zhang
Hui Tian
author_facet Mengchao Xue
Rongyang Li
Junjie Liu
Ming Lu
Zhenyi Li
Huiying Zhang
Hui Tian
author_sort Mengchao Xue
collection DOAJ
container_title Frontiers in Oncology
description BackgroundThis study aimed to construct a clinical prediction model and nomogram to differentiate invasive from non-invasive pulmonary adenocarcinoma in solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs).MethodWe analyzed computed tomography and clinical features as well as preoperative biomarkers in 1,106 patients with SPN who underwent pulmonary resection with definite pathology at Qilu Hospital of Shandong University between January 2020 and December 2021. Clinical parameters and imaging characteristics were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Predictive models and nomograms were developed and their recognition abilities were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The clinical utility of the nomogram was evaluated using decision curve analysis (DCA).ResultThe final regression analysis selected age, carcinoembryonic antigen, bronchus sign, lobulation, pleural adhesion, maximum diameter, and the consolidation-to-tumor ratio as associated factors. The areas under the ROC curves were 0.844 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.817–0.871) and 0.812 (95% CI, 0.766–0.857) for patients in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. The predictive model calibration curve revealed good calibration for both cohorts. The DCA results confirmed that the clinical prediction model was useful in clinical practice. Bias-corrected C-indices for the training and validation cohorts were 0.844 and 0.814, respectively.ConclusionOur predictive model and nomogram might be useful for guiding clinical decisions regarding personalized surgical intervention and treatment options.
format Article
id doaj-art-e1b8d5e60eef4e48897bb6d27729c403
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2234-943X
language English
publishDate 2024-07-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-e1b8d5e60eef4e48897bb6d27729c4032025-08-20T00:02:19ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Oncology2234-943X2024-07-011410.3389/fonc.2024.13345041334504Nomogram for predicting invasive lung adenocarcinoma in small solitary pulmonary nodulesMengchao XueRongyang LiJunjie LiuMing LuZhenyi LiHuiying ZhangHui TianBackgroundThis study aimed to construct a clinical prediction model and nomogram to differentiate invasive from non-invasive pulmonary adenocarcinoma in solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs).MethodWe analyzed computed tomography and clinical features as well as preoperative biomarkers in 1,106 patients with SPN who underwent pulmonary resection with definite pathology at Qilu Hospital of Shandong University between January 2020 and December 2021. Clinical parameters and imaging characteristics were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. Predictive models and nomograms were developed and their recognition abilities were evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The clinical utility of the nomogram was evaluated using decision curve analysis (DCA).ResultThe final regression analysis selected age, carcinoembryonic antigen, bronchus sign, lobulation, pleural adhesion, maximum diameter, and the consolidation-to-tumor ratio as associated factors. The areas under the ROC curves were 0.844 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.817–0.871) and 0.812 (95% CI, 0.766–0.857) for patients in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. The predictive model calibration curve revealed good calibration for both cohorts. The DCA results confirmed that the clinical prediction model was useful in clinical practice. Bias-corrected C-indices for the training and validation cohorts were 0.844 and 0.814, respectively.ConclusionOur predictive model and nomogram might be useful for guiding clinical decisions regarding personalized surgical intervention and treatment options.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2024.1334504/fullsolitary pulmonary nodulesdiagnosispredictionlogical modelinvasive pulmonary adenocarcinoma
spellingShingle Mengchao Xue
Rongyang Li
Junjie Liu
Ming Lu
Zhenyi Li
Huiying Zhang
Hui Tian
Nomogram for predicting invasive lung adenocarcinoma in small solitary pulmonary nodules
solitary pulmonary nodules
diagnosis
prediction
logical model
invasive pulmonary adenocarcinoma
title Nomogram for predicting invasive lung adenocarcinoma in small solitary pulmonary nodules
title_full Nomogram for predicting invasive lung adenocarcinoma in small solitary pulmonary nodules
title_fullStr Nomogram for predicting invasive lung adenocarcinoma in small solitary pulmonary nodules
title_full_unstemmed Nomogram for predicting invasive lung adenocarcinoma in small solitary pulmonary nodules
title_short Nomogram for predicting invasive lung adenocarcinoma in small solitary pulmonary nodules
title_sort nomogram for predicting invasive lung adenocarcinoma in small solitary pulmonary nodules
topic solitary pulmonary nodules
diagnosis
prediction
logical model
invasive pulmonary adenocarcinoma
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2024.1334504/full
work_keys_str_mv AT mengchaoxue nomogramforpredictinginvasivelungadenocarcinomainsmallsolitarypulmonarynodules
AT rongyangli nomogramforpredictinginvasivelungadenocarcinomainsmallsolitarypulmonarynodules
AT junjieliu nomogramforpredictinginvasivelungadenocarcinomainsmallsolitarypulmonarynodules
AT minglu nomogramforpredictinginvasivelungadenocarcinomainsmallsolitarypulmonarynodules
AT zhenyili nomogramforpredictinginvasivelungadenocarcinomainsmallsolitarypulmonarynodules
AT huiyingzhang nomogramforpredictinginvasivelungadenocarcinomainsmallsolitarypulmonarynodules
AT huitian nomogramforpredictinginvasivelungadenocarcinomainsmallsolitarypulmonarynodules