Validation of a Korean Version of Fertility Problem Inventory

Purpose: The Fertility Problem Inventory (FPI) is a screening instrument used to identify infertility-related stress. The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the FPI. Methods: Forward–backward translation of the FPI from English to Korean was con...

詳細記述

書誌詳細
出版年:Asian Nursing Research
主要な著者: Ju Hee Kim, RN, PhD, Hye Sook Shin, RN, PhD
フォーマット: 論文
言語:英語
出版事項: Elsevier 2014-09-01
主題:
オンライン・アクセス:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1976131714000462
_version_ 1849314934560653312
author Ju Hee Kim, RN, PhD
Hye Sook Shin, RN, PhD
author_facet Ju Hee Kim, RN, PhD
Hye Sook Shin, RN, PhD
author_sort Ju Hee Kim, RN, PhD
collection DOAJ
container_title Asian Nursing Research
description Purpose: The Fertility Problem Inventory (FPI) is a screening instrument used to identify infertility-related stress. The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the FPI. Methods: Forward–backward translation of the FPI from English to Korean was conducted. The translated instrument was pilot-tested and administered to 259 women with infertility. Test-retest reliability was conducted and the internal consistency coefficient was determined. Validity was evaluated through content validity, construct validity with confirmatory factor analysis, discriminant validity, and convergent validity. Results: The internal consistency was satisfactory (Cronbach's alpha = .92, item-total correlations = .60–.92). The overall content validity index was 96.9%, signifying that the FPI had good content validity. The model fit indexes were acceptable (goodness of fit index = .92, adjusted goodness of fit index = .91, normal fit index = .95, comparative fit index = .93, and root mean square error of approximation = .05), indicating good construct validity. The intercorrelations were significant, although low to moderate in size (.20–.59). The correlation between the FPI and depression ranged from .32 to .51 (p < .001), while the correlation between the FPI and the fertility-related quality of life ranged from –.35 to –.58 (p < .001). Conclusion: The Korean version of the FPI has high reliability, and good content, construct, discriminant, and convergent validity. A validated Korean version of the FPI may help nurses identify infertility-related stress and administer appropriate nursing interventions to Korean women with infertility.
format Article
id doaj-art-e1d41ec85a214e86bd9e95e5482f35bb
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 1976-1317
language English
publishDate 2014-09-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-e1d41ec85a214e86bd9e95e5482f35bb2025-09-03T02:10:27ZengElsevierAsian Nursing Research1976-13172014-09-018320721210.1016/j.anr.2014.03.004Validation of a Korean Version of Fertility Problem InventoryJu Hee Kim, RN, PhDHye Sook Shin, RN, PhDPurpose: The Fertility Problem Inventory (FPI) is a screening instrument used to identify infertility-related stress. The purpose of this study was to assess the reliability and validity of the Korean version of the FPI. Methods: Forward–backward translation of the FPI from English to Korean was conducted. The translated instrument was pilot-tested and administered to 259 women with infertility. Test-retest reliability was conducted and the internal consistency coefficient was determined. Validity was evaluated through content validity, construct validity with confirmatory factor analysis, discriminant validity, and convergent validity. Results: The internal consistency was satisfactory (Cronbach's alpha = .92, item-total correlations = .60–.92). The overall content validity index was 96.9%, signifying that the FPI had good content validity. The model fit indexes were acceptable (goodness of fit index = .92, adjusted goodness of fit index = .91, normal fit index = .95, comparative fit index = .93, and root mean square error of approximation = .05), indicating good construct validity. The intercorrelations were significant, although low to moderate in size (.20–.59). The correlation between the FPI and depression ranged from .32 to .51 (p < .001), while the correlation between the FPI and the fertility-related quality of life ranged from –.35 to –.58 (p < .001). Conclusion: The Korean version of the FPI has high reliability, and good content, construct, discriminant, and convergent validity. A validated Korean version of the FPI may help nurses identify infertility-related stress and administer appropriate nursing interventions to Korean women with infertility.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1976131714000462infertilityreliability and validitystress
spellingShingle Ju Hee Kim, RN, PhD
Hye Sook Shin, RN, PhD
Validation of a Korean Version of Fertility Problem Inventory
infertility
reliability and validity
stress
title Validation of a Korean Version of Fertility Problem Inventory
title_full Validation of a Korean Version of Fertility Problem Inventory
title_fullStr Validation of a Korean Version of Fertility Problem Inventory
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a Korean Version of Fertility Problem Inventory
title_short Validation of a Korean Version of Fertility Problem Inventory
title_sort validation of a korean version of fertility problem inventory
topic infertility
reliability and validity
stress
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1976131714000462
work_keys_str_mv AT juheekimrnphd validationofakoreanversionoffertilityprobleminventory
AT hyesookshinrnphd validationofakoreanversionoffertilityprobleminventory