Errors in laboratory specimen using barcode system

Objective: To evaluate errors of specimens sending from in-patient department and emergency room, Songklanagarind Hospital after adopting online requests and barcode system. Material and Methods: Data on errors which were recorded and classified into 5 categories were retrieved from Specimen Recepti...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Health Science and Medical Research (JHSMR)
Main Authors: P Kongthong, P Thongsuksai, P Rengrairattanarose, P Boonyaphiphat, P Chusongsang, P Apirakthunyakorn
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Prince of Songkla University 2009-08-01
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.jhsmr.org/index.php/jhsmr/article/view/399
_version_ 1852770777972080640
author P Kongthong
P Thongsuksai
P Rengrairattanarose
P Boonyaphiphat
P Chusongsang
P Apirakthunyakorn
author_facet P Kongthong
P Thongsuksai
P Rengrairattanarose
P Boonyaphiphat
P Chusongsang
P Apirakthunyakorn
author_sort P Kongthong
collection DOAJ
container_title Journal of Health Science and Medical Research (JHSMR)
description Objective: To evaluate errors of specimens sending from in-patient department and emergency room, Songklanagarind Hospital after adopting online requests and barcode system. Material and Methods: Data on errors which were recorded and classified into 5 categories were retrieved from Specimen Reception Center of the Pathology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University during January 2005 to December 2007. Frequency and trends of errors were analysed. Results: There were 336,208 specimens during the study period and a total of 5,097 errors (1.52%) were found. The rates were gradually declined from 1.82% to 1.55% and 1.27% from 2005-2007. For type of errors, missing barcode data and inappropriate specimen quality were equally at 0.48% whereas the rate of mismatch barcode and patient name label was 0.22% incorrect specimen was 0.18% and incomplete specimens received was 0.16%. Considering the place where the specimens were collected, the emergency room had the lowest error rate (1.26%). Analysis of yearly trends revealed overall error rates, the rate of missing barcode data, incomplete specimens and inappropriate specimen quality were significantly declined. Conclusion: Errors still exist after using electronic requests and barcode labeling. However, the errors rates were gradually decreased. This would be, to some extent, the result of strategies during the period, in particular the cooperation between laboratory and nurses.
format Article
id doaj-art-e1ec9d5c38f74bcebb18ff718fad60c0
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2586-9981
2630-0559
language English
publishDate 2009-08-01
publisher Prince of Songkla University
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-e1ec9d5c38f74bcebb18ff718fad60c02025-08-19T20:51:59ZengPrince of Songkla UniversityJournal of Health Science and Medical Research (JHSMR)2586-99812630-05592009-08-01274323333413Errors in laboratory specimen using barcode systemP Kongthong0P Thongsuksai1P Rengrairattanarose2P Boonyaphiphat3P Chusongsang4P Apirakthunyakorn5Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90110,Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90110,Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90110,Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90110,Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90110,Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hat Yai, Songkhla 90110,Objective: To evaluate errors of specimens sending from in-patient department and emergency room, Songklanagarind Hospital after adopting online requests and barcode system. Material and Methods: Data on errors which were recorded and classified into 5 categories were retrieved from Specimen Reception Center of the Pathology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University during January 2005 to December 2007. Frequency and trends of errors were analysed. Results: There were 336,208 specimens during the study period and a total of 5,097 errors (1.52%) were found. The rates were gradually declined from 1.82% to 1.55% and 1.27% from 2005-2007. For type of errors, missing barcode data and inappropriate specimen quality were equally at 0.48% whereas the rate of mismatch barcode and patient name label was 0.22% incorrect specimen was 0.18% and incomplete specimens received was 0.16%. Considering the place where the specimens were collected, the emergency room had the lowest error rate (1.26%). Analysis of yearly trends revealed overall error rates, the rate of missing barcode data, incomplete specimens and inappropriate specimen quality were significantly declined. Conclusion: Errors still exist after using electronic requests and barcode labeling. However, the errors rates were gradually decreased. This would be, to some extent, the result of strategies during the period, in particular the cooperation between laboratory and nurses.https://www.jhsmr.org/index.php/jhsmr/article/view/399barcode systememergency roomin-patients departmentlaboratory medicinespecimen error
spellingShingle P Kongthong
P Thongsuksai
P Rengrairattanarose
P Boonyaphiphat
P Chusongsang
P Apirakthunyakorn
Errors in laboratory specimen using barcode system
barcode system
emergency room
in-patients department
laboratory medicine
specimen error
title Errors in laboratory specimen using barcode system
title_full Errors in laboratory specimen using barcode system
title_fullStr Errors in laboratory specimen using barcode system
title_full_unstemmed Errors in laboratory specimen using barcode system
title_short Errors in laboratory specimen using barcode system
title_sort errors in laboratory specimen using barcode system
topic barcode system
emergency room
in-patients department
laboratory medicine
specimen error
url https://www.jhsmr.org/index.php/jhsmr/article/view/399
work_keys_str_mv AT pkongthong errorsinlaboratoryspecimenusingbarcodesystem
AT pthongsuksai errorsinlaboratoryspecimenusingbarcodesystem
AT prengrairattanarose errorsinlaboratoryspecimenusingbarcodesystem
AT pboonyaphiphat errorsinlaboratoryspecimenusingbarcodesystem
AT pchusongsang errorsinlaboratoryspecimenusingbarcodesystem
AT papirakthunyakorn errorsinlaboratoryspecimenusingbarcodesystem