Moral parochialism and causal appraisal of transgressive harm in Seoul and Los Angeles

Abstract The evolutionary fitness payoffs of moral condemnation are greatest within an individual’s immediate social milieu. Accordingly, insofar as human moral intuitions have been shaped by adaptive design, we can expect transgressive harms to be perceived as more wrong when transpiring in the her...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Scientific Reports
Main Authors: Colin Holbrook, Leehyun Yoon, Daniel M. T. Fessler, Cody Moser, Shairy Jimenez Delgado, Hackjin Kim
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Nature Portfolio 2022-08-01
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18521-0
_version_ 1852754106129580032
author Colin Holbrook
Leehyun Yoon
Daniel M. T. Fessler
Cody Moser
Shairy Jimenez Delgado
Hackjin Kim
author_facet Colin Holbrook
Leehyun Yoon
Daniel M. T. Fessler
Cody Moser
Shairy Jimenez Delgado
Hackjin Kim
author_sort Colin Holbrook
collection DOAJ
container_title Scientific Reports
description Abstract The evolutionary fitness payoffs of moral condemnation are greatest within an individual’s immediate social milieu. Accordingly, insofar as human moral intuitions have been shaped by adaptive design, we can expect transgressive harms to be perceived as more wrong when transpiring in the here and now than when occurring at a distance, or with the approval of local authority figures. This moral parochialism hypothesis has been supported by research conducted in diverse societies, but has yet to be tested in an East Asian society, despite prior research indicating that East Asians appraise transgressive acts as being caused by situational and contextual factors to a greater extent than do Westerners, who tend to emphasize dispositional factors (i.e., the transgressor’s personal nature). Here, in a quasi-experiment using field samples recruited in Seoul and Los Angeles, we tested (i) the moral parochialism hypothesis regarding the perceived wrongness of transgressions, as well as (ii) the extent to which these wrongness judgments might be influenced by cross-cultural differences in causal appraisals. Despite notably large differences across the two societies in situational versus dispositional appraisals of the causes of the transgressions, replicating previous findings elsewhere, in both societies we found that transgressions were deemed less wrong when occurring at spatial or temporal remove or with the consent of authorities. These findings add to the understanding of morality as universally focused on local affairs, notwithstanding cultural variation in perceptions of the situational versus dispositional causes of (im)moral acts.
format Article
id doaj-art-e218ea9372084ce7905ffcf9807cf2d7
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2045-2322
language English
publishDate 2022-08-01
publisher Nature Portfolio
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-e218ea9372084ce7905ffcf9807cf2d72025-08-19T20:58:50ZengNature PortfolioScientific Reports2045-23222022-08-0112111010.1038/s41598-022-18521-0Moral parochialism and causal appraisal of transgressive harm in Seoul and Los AngelesColin Holbrook0Leehyun Yoon1Daniel M. T. Fessler2Cody Moser3Shairy Jimenez Delgado4Hackjin Kim5Department of Cognitive and Information Sciences, University of California, MercedDepartment of Human Ecology, University of California, DavisDepartment of Anthropology, University of California, Los AngelesDepartment of Cognitive and Information Sciences, University of California, MercedDepartment of Cognitive and Information Sciences, University of California, MercedSchool of Psychology, Korea UniversityAbstract The evolutionary fitness payoffs of moral condemnation are greatest within an individual’s immediate social milieu. Accordingly, insofar as human moral intuitions have been shaped by adaptive design, we can expect transgressive harms to be perceived as more wrong when transpiring in the here and now than when occurring at a distance, or with the approval of local authority figures. This moral parochialism hypothesis has been supported by research conducted in diverse societies, but has yet to be tested in an East Asian society, despite prior research indicating that East Asians appraise transgressive acts as being caused by situational and contextual factors to a greater extent than do Westerners, who tend to emphasize dispositional factors (i.e., the transgressor’s personal nature). Here, in a quasi-experiment using field samples recruited in Seoul and Los Angeles, we tested (i) the moral parochialism hypothesis regarding the perceived wrongness of transgressions, as well as (ii) the extent to which these wrongness judgments might be influenced by cross-cultural differences in causal appraisals. Despite notably large differences across the two societies in situational versus dispositional appraisals of the causes of the transgressions, replicating previous findings elsewhere, in both societies we found that transgressions were deemed less wrong when occurring at spatial or temporal remove or with the consent of authorities. These findings add to the understanding of morality as universally focused on local affairs, notwithstanding cultural variation in perceptions of the situational versus dispositional causes of (im)moral acts.https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18521-0
spellingShingle Colin Holbrook
Leehyun Yoon
Daniel M. T. Fessler
Cody Moser
Shairy Jimenez Delgado
Hackjin Kim
Moral parochialism and causal appraisal of transgressive harm in Seoul and Los Angeles
title Moral parochialism and causal appraisal of transgressive harm in Seoul and Los Angeles
title_full Moral parochialism and causal appraisal of transgressive harm in Seoul and Los Angeles
title_fullStr Moral parochialism and causal appraisal of transgressive harm in Seoul and Los Angeles
title_full_unstemmed Moral parochialism and causal appraisal of transgressive harm in Seoul and Los Angeles
title_short Moral parochialism and causal appraisal of transgressive harm in Seoul and Los Angeles
title_sort moral parochialism and causal appraisal of transgressive harm in seoul and los angeles
url https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-18521-0
work_keys_str_mv AT colinholbrook moralparochialismandcausalappraisaloftransgressiveharminseoulandlosangeles
AT leehyunyoon moralparochialismandcausalappraisaloftransgressiveharminseoulandlosangeles
AT danielmtfessler moralparochialismandcausalappraisaloftransgressiveharminseoulandlosangeles
AT codymoser moralparochialismandcausalappraisaloftransgressiveharminseoulandlosangeles
AT shairyjimenezdelgado moralparochialismandcausalappraisaloftransgressiveharminseoulandlosangeles
AT hackjinkim moralparochialismandcausalappraisaloftransgressiveharminseoulandlosangeles