Effect of 3-Dimensional Versus Single-Plane Changes in Pelvic Dynamics on Range of Motion in Hips With Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Computer Simulation Analysis

• Published in: Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
• Main Authors: Hideki Honda MD, Naomi Kobayashi MD, PhD, Emi Kamono PT, Yohei Yukizawa MD, PhD, Shota Higashihira MD, PhD, Shu Takagawa MD, PhD, Hyonmin Choe MD, PhD, Hiroyuki Ike MD, PhD, Taro Tezuka MD, PhD, Yutaka Inaba MD, PhD
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: SAGE Publishing 2022-09-01
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671221123604

Background: Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) is primarily caused by bony impingement between the acetabulum and femoral neck during hip motion. Increasing posterior pelvic tilt improves hip range of motion in patients with FAI. Purpose: To use computer simulation analysis to compare the effects of 3-dimensional (3D) changes in pelvic tilt (sagittal tilt [St], axial rotation, and coronal tilt) with changes in a single plane (St), with the aim of improving range of motion in patients with FAI. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: We evaluated 43 patients with FAI treated by arthroscopic cam resection. A 3D simulation was used to construct the following pelvic models: a 5° and 10° increase posteriorly in St (St5° and St10°) and a combined 5° change in St, axial rotation, and coronal tilt (Complex5°) from the baseline of the anterior pelvic plane. Improvements in maximum internal rotation (MIR) at 45°, 70°, and 90° of hip flexion and improvements in maximum flexion with no internal rotation were compared among the St5°, St10°, and Complex5° models. The pelvic models of each single-plane change of 5° and 10° were evaluated in the same simulation. Results: At 90° and 70°, there was a significant difference between the Complex5° and St10° models with respect to improvement in MIR ( P = .004 at 90° of flexion; P = .017 at 70° of flexion). There was no significant difference in MIR at 45° of flexion ( P = .71) or in maximum flexion ( P = .42). Conclusion: At 70° and 90° of hip flexion, a combined change in 3D pelvic alignment of 5° (ie, St, axial rotation, and coronal tilt) was more effective in improving hip MIR than a 10° change in St only. Clinical Relevance: Effective physical therapy for FAI should address pelvic motion in all 3 planes rather than in a single plane.