Conservative treatment, plate fixation, or prosthesis for proximal humeral fracture. A prospective randomized study

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Proximal humerus fracture is the third most common fracture type after hip and distal radius fracture in elderly patients. A comprehensive study by Palvanen <it>et al</it>. demonstrated an increase in the annual fracture...

全面介紹

書目詳細資料
發表在:BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
Main Authors: Launonen Antti P, Lepola Vesa, Flinkkilä Tapio, Strandberg Niko, Ojanperä Johanna, Rissanen Pekka, Malmivaara Antti, Mattila Ville M, Elo Petra, Viljakka Timo, Laitinen Minna
格式: Article
語言:英语
出版: BMC 2012-09-01
主題:
在線閱讀:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/13/167
_version_ 1851867535771697152
author Launonen Antti P
Lepola Vesa
Flinkkilä Tapio
Strandberg Niko
Ojanperä Johanna
Rissanen Pekka
Malmivaara Antti
Mattila Ville M
Elo Petra
Viljakka Timo
Laitinen Minna
author_facet Launonen Antti P
Lepola Vesa
Flinkkilä Tapio
Strandberg Niko
Ojanperä Johanna
Rissanen Pekka
Malmivaara Antti
Mattila Ville M
Elo Petra
Viljakka Timo
Laitinen Minna
author_sort Launonen Antti P
collection DOAJ
container_title BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
description <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Proximal humerus fracture is the third most common fracture type after hip and distal radius fracture in elderly patients. A comprehensive study by Palvanen <it>et al</it>. demonstrated an increase in the annual fracture rate of 13.7% per year over the past 33 years. Should this trend continue, the fracture rate would triple over the next three decades. The increasing incidence of low-energy fractures raises questions about the optimal treatment in terms of functional outcome, pain, and rehabilitation time, as well as the economical impact. Despite the high incidence and costs of proximal humerus fractures, there is currently no valid scientific evidence for the best treatment method. Several publications, including a Cochrane review outline the need for high-quality, well-designed randomized controlled trials.</p> <p>Methods/Design</p> <p>The study is a prospective, randomized, national multi-center trial. The hypothesis of the trial is that surgical treatment of displaced proximal humerus fractures achieves better functional outcome, pain relief, and patient satisfaction compared to conservative treatment. The trial is designed to compare conservative and surgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures in patients 60 years and older. The trial includes two strata. Stratum I compares surgical treatment with locking plates to conservative treatment for two-part fractures. Stratum II compares multi-fragmented fractures, including three- and four-part fractures. The aim of Stratum II is to compare conservative treatment, surgical treatment with the Philos locking plate, and hemiarthroplasty with an Epoca prosthesis. The primary outcome measure will be the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score and the secondary outcome measures will be the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) value, OSS, Constant-Murley Score, VAS, and 15D.</p> <p>Recruiting time will be 3 years. The results will be analyzed after the 2-year follow-up period.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>This publication presents a prospective, randomized, national multi-center trial. It gives details of patient flow, randomization, aftercare and also ways of analysis of the material and ways to present and publish the results.</p> <p>Trial registration</p> <p>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01246167</p>
format Article
id doaj-art-e25a5ccc8d484456a9f6e25fac3bff6f
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 1471-2474
language English
publishDate 2012-09-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-e25a5ccc8d484456a9f6e25fac3bff6f2025-08-19T22:18:04ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742012-09-0113116710.1186/1471-2474-13-167Conservative treatment, plate fixation, or prosthesis for proximal humeral fracture. A prospective randomized studyLaunonen Antti PLepola VesaFlinkkilä TapioStrandberg NikoOjanperä JohannaRissanen PekkaMalmivaara AnttiMattila Ville MElo PetraViljakka TimoLaitinen Minna<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Proximal humerus fracture is the third most common fracture type after hip and distal radius fracture in elderly patients. A comprehensive study by Palvanen <it>et al</it>. demonstrated an increase in the annual fracture rate of 13.7% per year over the past 33 years. Should this trend continue, the fracture rate would triple over the next three decades. The increasing incidence of low-energy fractures raises questions about the optimal treatment in terms of functional outcome, pain, and rehabilitation time, as well as the economical impact. Despite the high incidence and costs of proximal humerus fractures, there is currently no valid scientific evidence for the best treatment method. Several publications, including a Cochrane review outline the need for high-quality, well-designed randomized controlled trials.</p> <p>Methods/Design</p> <p>The study is a prospective, randomized, national multi-center trial. The hypothesis of the trial is that surgical treatment of displaced proximal humerus fractures achieves better functional outcome, pain relief, and patient satisfaction compared to conservative treatment. The trial is designed to compare conservative and surgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures in patients 60 years and older. The trial includes two strata. Stratum I compares surgical treatment with locking plates to conservative treatment for two-part fractures. Stratum II compares multi-fragmented fractures, including three- and four-part fractures. The aim of Stratum II is to compare conservative treatment, surgical treatment with the Philos locking plate, and hemiarthroplasty with an Epoca prosthesis. The primary outcome measure will be the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score and the secondary outcome measures will be the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) value, OSS, Constant-Murley Score, VAS, and 15D.</p> <p>Recruiting time will be 3 years. The results will be analyzed after the 2-year follow-up period.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>This publication presents a prospective, randomized, national multi-center trial. It gives details of patient flow, randomization, aftercare and also ways of analysis of the material and ways to present and publish the results.</p> <p>Trial registration</p> <p>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01246167</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/13/167ProximalHumerusFractureConservativeOperativeLocking plateProsthesisPhilosEpocaRCT
spellingShingle Launonen Antti P
Lepola Vesa
Flinkkilä Tapio
Strandberg Niko
Ojanperä Johanna
Rissanen Pekka
Malmivaara Antti
Mattila Ville M
Elo Petra
Viljakka Timo
Laitinen Minna
Conservative treatment, plate fixation, or prosthesis for proximal humeral fracture. A prospective randomized study
Proximal
Humerus
Fracture
Conservative
Operative
Locking plate
Prosthesis
Philos
Epoca
RCT
title Conservative treatment, plate fixation, or prosthesis for proximal humeral fracture. A prospective randomized study
title_full Conservative treatment, plate fixation, or prosthesis for proximal humeral fracture. A prospective randomized study
title_fullStr Conservative treatment, plate fixation, or prosthesis for proximal humeral fracture. A prospective randomized study
title_full_unstemmed Conservative treatment, plate fixation, or prosthesis for proximal humeral fracture. A prospective randomized study
title_short Conservative treatment, plate fixation, or prosthesis for proximal humeral fracture. A prospective randomized study
title_sort conservative treatment plate fixation or prosthesis for proximal humeral fracture a prospective randomized study
topic Proximal
Humerus
Fracture
Conservative
Operative
Locking plate
Prosthesis
Philos
Epoca
RCT
url http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/13/167
work_keys_str_mv AT launonenanttip conservativetreatmentplatefixationorprosthesisforproximalhumeralfractureaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT lepolavesa conservativetreatmentplatefixationorprosthesisforproximalhumeralfractureaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT flinkkilatapio conservativetreatmentplatefixationorprosthesisforproximalhumeralfractureaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT strandbergniko conservativetreatmentplatefixationorprosthesisforproximalhumeralfractureaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT ojanperajohanna conservativetreatmentplatefixationorprosthesisforproximalhumeralfractureaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT rissanenpekka conservativetreatmentplatefixationorprosthesisforproximalhumeralfractureaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT malmivaaraantti conservativetreatmentplatefixationorprosthesisforproximalhumeralfractureaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT mattilavillem conservativetreatmentplatefixationorprosthesisforproximalhumeralfractureaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT elopetra conservativetreatmentplatefixationorprosthesisforproximalhumeralfractureaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT viljakkatimo conservativetreatmentplatefixationorprosthesisforproximalhumeralfractureaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT laitinenminna conservativetreatmentplatefixationorprosthesisforproximalhumeralfractureaprospectiverandomizedstudy