Conservative treatment, plate fixation, or prosthesis for proximal humeral fracture. A prospective randomized study
<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Proximal humerus fracture is the third most common fracture type after hip and distal radius fracture in elderly patients. A comprehensive study by Palvanen <it>et al</it>. demonstrated an increase in the annual fracture...
| 發表在: | BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
| 格式: | Article |
| 語言: | 英语 |
| 出版: |
BMC
2012-09-01
|
| 主題: | |
| 在線閱讀: | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/13/167 |
| _version_ | 1851867535771697152 |
|---|---|
| author | Launonen Antti P Lepola Vesa Flinkkilä Tapio Strandberg Niko Ojanperä Johanna Rissanen Pekka Malmivaara Antti Mattila Ville M Elo Petra Viljakka Timo Laitinen Minna |
| author_facet | Launonen Antti P Lepola Vesa Flinkkilä Tapio Strandberg Niko Ojanperä Johanna Rissanen Pekka Malmivaara Antti Mattila Ville M Elo Petra Viljakka Timo Laitinen Minna |
| author_sort | Launonen Antti P |
| collection | DOAJ |
| container_title | BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders |
| description | <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Proximal humerus fracture is the third most common fracture type after hip and distal radius fracture in elderly patients. A comprehensive study by Palvanen <it>et al</it>. demonstrated an increase in the annual fracture rate of 13.7% per year over the past 33 years. Should this trend continue, the fracture rate would triple over the next three decades. The increasing incidence of low-energy fractures raises questions about the optimal treatment in terms of functional outcome, pain, and rehabilitation time, as well as the economical impact. Despite the high incidence and costs of proximal humerus fractures, there is currently no valid scientific evidence for the best treatment method. Several publications, including a Cochrane review outline the need for high-quality, well-designed randomized controlled trials.</p> <p>Methods/Design</p> <p>The study is a prospective, randomized, national multi-center trial. The hypothesis of the trial is that surgical treatment of displaced proximal humerus fractures achieves better functional outcome, pain relief, and patient satisfaction compared to conservative treatment. The trial is designed to compare conservative and surgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures in patients 60 years and older. The trial includes two strata. Stratum I compares surgical treatment with locking plates to conservative treatment for two-part fractures. Stratum II compares multi-fragmented fractures, including three- and four-part fractures. The aim of Stratum II is to compare conservative treatment, surgical treatment with the Philos locking plate, and hemiarthroplasty with an Epoca prosthesis. The primary outcome measure will be the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score and the secondary outcome measures will be the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) value, OSS, Constant-Murley Score, VAS, and 15D.</p> <p>Recruiting time will be 3 years. The results will be analyzed after the 2-year follow-up period.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>This publication presents a prospective, randomized, national multi-center trial. It gives details of patient flow, randomization, aftercare and also ways of analysis of the material and ways to present and publish the results.</p> <p>Trial registration</p> <p>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01246167</p> |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e25a5ccc8d484456a9f6e25fac3bff6f |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| issn | 1471-2474 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2012-09-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| spelling | doaj-art-e25a5ccc8d484456a9f6e25fac3bff6f2025-08-19T22:18:04ZengBMCBMC Musculoskeletal Disorders1471-24742012-09-0113116710.1186/1471-2474-13-167Conservative treatment, plate fixation, or prosthesis for proximal humeral fracture. A prospective randomized studyLaunonen Antti PLepola VesaFlinkkilä TapioStrandberg NikoOjanperä JohannaRissanen PekkaMalmivaara AnttiMattila Ville MElo PetraViljakka TimoLaitinen Minna<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Proximal humerus fracture is the third most common fracture type after hip and distal radius fracture in elderly patients. A comprehensive study by Palvanen <it>et al</it>. demonstrated an increase in the annual fracture rate of 13.7% per year over the past 33 years. Should this trend continue, the fracture rate would triple over the next three decades. The increasing incidence of low-energy fractures raises questions about the optimal treatment in terms of functional outcome, pain, and rehabilitation time, as well as the economical impact. Despite the high incidence and costs of proximal humerus fractures, there is currently no valid scientific evidence for the best treatment method. Several publications, including a Cochrane review outline the need for high-quality, well-designed randomized controlled trials.</p> <p>Methods/Design</p> <p>The study is a prospective, randomized, national multi-center trial. The hypothesis of the trial is that surgical treatment of displaced proximal humerus fractures achieves better functional outcome, pain relief, and patient satisfaction compared to conservative treatment. The trial is designed to compare conservative and surgical treatment of proximal humerus fractures in patients 60 years and older. The trial includes two strata. Stratum I compares surgical treatment with locking plates to conservative treatment for two-part fractures. Stratum II compares multi-fragmented fractures, including three- and four-part fractures. The aim of Stratum II is to compare conservative treatment, surgical treatment with the Philos locking plate, and hemiarthroplasty with an Epoca prosthesis. The primary outcome measure will be the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score and the secondary outcome measures will be the EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D) value, OSS, Constant-Murley Score, VAS, and 15D.</p> <p>Recruiting time will be 3 years. The results will be analyzed after the 2-year follow-up period.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>This publication presents a prospective, randomized, national multi-center trial. It gives details of patient flow, randomization, aftercare and also ways of analysis of the material and ways to present and publish the results.</p> <p>Trial registration</p> <p>ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01246167</p>http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/13/167ProximalHumerusFractureConservativeOperativeLocking plateProsthesisPhilosEpocaRCT |
| spellingShingle | Launonen Antti P Lepola Vesa Flinkkilä Tapio Strandberg Niko Ojanperä Johanna Rissanen Pekka Malmivaara Antti Mattila Ville M Elo Petra Viljakka Timo Laitinen Minna Conservative treatment, plate fixation, or prosthesis for proximal humeral fracture. A prospective randomized study Proximal Humerus Fracture Conservative Operative Locking plate Prosthesis Philos Epoca RCT |
| title | Conservative treatment, plate fixation, or prosthesis for proximal humeral fracture. A prospective randomized study |
| title_full | Conservative treatment, plate fixation, or prosthesis for proximal humeral fracture. A prospective randomized study |
| title_fullStr | Conservative treatment, plate fixation, or prosthesis for proximal humeral fracture. A prospective randomized study |
| title_full_unstemmed | Conservative treatment, plate fixation, or prosthesis for proximal humeral fracture. A prospective randomized study |
| title_short | Conservative treatment, plate fixation, or prosthesis for proximal humeral fracture. A prospective randomized study |
| title_sort | conservative treatment plate fixation or prosthesis for proximal humeral fracture a prospective randomized study |
| topic | Proximal Humerus Fracture Conservative Operative Locking plate Prosthesis Philos Epoca RCT |
| url | http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2474/13/167 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT launonenanttip conservativetreatmentplatefixationorprosthesisforproximalhumeralfractureaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT lepolavesa conservativetreatmentplatefixationorprosthesisforproximalhumeralfractureaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT flinkkilatapio conservativetreatmentplatefixationorprosthesisforproximalhumeralfractureaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT strandbergniko conservativetreatmentplatefixationorprosthesisforproximalhumeralfractureaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT ojanperajohanna conservativetreatmentplatefixationorprosthesisforproximalhumeralfractureaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT rissanenpekka conservativetreatmentplatefixationorprosthesisforproximalhumeralfractureaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT malmivaaraantti conservativetreatmentplatefixationorprosthesisforproximalhumeralfractureaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT mattilavillem conservativetreatmentplatefixationorprosthesisforproximalhumeralfractureaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT elopetra conservativetreatmentplatefixationorprosthesisforproximalhumeralfractureaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT viljakkatimo conservativetreatmentplatefixationorprosthesisforproximalhumeralfractureaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT laitinenminna conservativetreatmentplatefixationorprosthesisforproximalhumeralfractureaprospectiverandomizedstudy |
