Morphic Sensors for Respiratory Parameters Estimation: Validation against Overnight Polysomnography

Effective monitoring of respiratory disturbances during sleep requires a sensor capable of accurately capturing chest movements or airflow displacement. Gold-standard monitoring of sleep and breathing through polysomnography achieves this task through dedicated chest/abdomen bands, thermistors, and...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biosensors
Main Authors: Ganesh R. Naik, Paul P. Breen, Titus Jayarathna, Benjamin K. Tong, Danny J. Eckert, Gaetano D. Gargiulo
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-07-01
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6374/13/7/703
_version_ 1851894644190740480
author Ganesh R. Naik
Paul P. Breen
Titus Jayarathna
Benjamin K. Tong
Danny J. Eckert
Gaetano D. Gargiulo
author_facet Ganesh R. Naik
Paul P. Breen
Titus Jayarathna
Benjamin K. Tong
Danny J. Eckert
Gaetano D. Gargiulo
author_sort Ganesh R. Naik
collection DOAJ
container_title Biosensors
description Effective monitoring of respiratory disturbances during sleep requires a sensor capable of accurately capturing chest movements or airflow displacement. Gold-standard monitoring of sleep and breathing through polysomnography achieves this task through dedicated chest/abdomen bands, thermistors, and nasal flow sensors, and more detailed physiology, evaluations via a nasal mask, pneumotachograph, and airway pressure sensors. However, these measurement approaches can be invasive and time-consuming to perform and analyze. This work compares the performance of a non-invasive wearable stretchable morphic sensor, which does not require direct skin contact, embedded in a t-shirt worn by 32 volunteer participants (26 males, 6 females) with sleep-disordered breathing who performed a detailed, overnight in-laboratory sleep study. Direct comparison of computed respiratory parameters from morphic sensors versus traditional polysomnography had approximately 95% (95 ± 0.7) accuracy. These findings confirm that novel wearable morphic sensors provide a viable alternative to non-invasively and simultaneously capture respiratory rate and chest and abdominal motions.
format Article
id doaj-art-e28af2a8e02e4d76816098dee01fd466
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2079-6374
language English
publishDate 2023-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-e28af2a8e02e4d76816098dee01fd4662025-08-19T22:08:20ZengMDPI AGBiosensors2079-63742023-07-0113770310.3390/bios13070703Morphic Sensors for Respiratory Parameters Estimation: Validation against Overnight PolysomnographyGanesh R. Naik0Paul P. Breen1Titus Jayarathna2Benjamin K. Tong3Danny J. Eckert4Gaetano D. Gargiulo5Adelaide Institute for Sleep Health (Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute: Sleep Health), College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA 5042, AustraliaThe MARCS Institute, Western Sydney University, Westmead, NSW 2145, AustraliaThe MARCS Institute, Western Sydney University, Westmead, NSW 2145, AustraliaNeuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, NSW 2031, AustraliaAdelaide Institute for Sleep Health (Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute: Sleep Health), College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA 5042, AustraliaThe MARCS Institute, Western Sydney University, Westmead, NSW 2145, AustraliaEffective monitoring of respiratory disturbances during sleep requires a sensor capable of accurately capturing chest movements or airflow displacement. Gold-standard monitoring of sleep and breathing through polysomnography achieves this task through dedicated chest/abdomen bands, thermistors, and nasal flow sensors, and more detailed physiology, evaluations via a nasal mask, pneumotachograph, and airway pressure sensors. However, these measurement approaches can be invasive and time-consuming to perform and analyze. This work compares the performance of a non-invasive wearable stretchable morphic sensor, which does not require direct skin contact, embedded in a t-shirt worn by 32 volunteer participants (26 males, 6 females) with sleep-disordered breathing who performed a detailed, overnight in-laboratory sleep study. Direct comparison of computed respiratory parameters from morphic sensors versus traditional polysomnography had approximately 95% (95 ± 0.7) accuracy. These findings confirm that novel wearable morphic sensors provide a viable alternative to non-invasively and simultaneously capture respiratory rate and chest and abdominal motions.https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6374/13/7/703morphic sensorrespiratory rateheart ratewearablespolysomnography
spellingShingle Ganesh R. Naik
Paul P. Breen
Titus Jayarathna
Benjamin K. Tong
Danny J. Eckert
Gaetano D. Gargiulo
Morphic Sensors for Respiratory Parameters Estimation: Validation against Overnight Polysomnography
morphic sensor
respiratory rate
heart rate
wearables
polysomnography
title Morphic Sensors for Respiratory Parameters Estimation: Validation against Overnight Polysomnography
title_full Morphic Sensors for Respiratory Parameters Estimation: Validation against Overnight Polysomnography
title_fullStr Morphic Sensors for Respiratory Parameters Estimation: Validation against Overnight Polysomnography
title_full_unstemmed Morphic Sensors for Respiratory Parameters Estimation: Validation against Overnight Polysomnography
title_short Morphic Sensors for Respiratory Parameters Estimation: Validation against Overnight Polysomnography
title_sort morphic sensors for respiratory parameters estimation validation against overnight polysomnography
topic morphic sensor
respiratory rate
heart rate
wearables
polysomnography
url https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6374/13/7/703
work_keys_str_mv AT ganeshrnaik morphicsensorsforrespiratoryparametersestimationvalidationagainstovernightpolysomnography
AT paulpbreen morphicsensorsforrespiratoryparametersestimationvalidationagainstovernightpolysomnography
AT titusjayarathna morphicsensorsforrespiratoryparametersestimationvalidationagainstovernightpolysomnography
AT benjaminktong morphicsensorsforrespiratoryparametersestimationvalidationagainstovernightpolysomnography
AT dannyjeckert morphicsensorsforrespiratoryparametersestimationvalidationagainstovernightpolysomnography
AT gaetanodgargiulo morphicsensorsforrespiratoryparametersestimationvalidationagainstovernightpolysomnography