Morphic Sensors for Respiratory Parameters Estimation: Validation against Overnight Polysomnography
Effective monitoring of respiratory disturbances during sleep requires a sensor capable of accurately capturing chest movements or airflow displacement. Gold-standard monitoring of sleep and breathing through polysomnography achieves this task through dedicated chest/abdomen bands, thermistors, and...
| Published in: | Biosensors |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2023-07-01
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6374/13/7/703 |
| _version_ | 1851894644190740480 |
|---|---|
| author | Ganesh R. Naik Paul P. Breen Titus Jayarathna Benjamin K. Tong Danny J. Eckert Gaetano D. Gargiulo |
| author_facet | Ganesh R. Naik Paul P. Breen Titus Jayarathna Benjamin K. Tong Danny J. Eckert Gaetano D. Gargiulo |
| author_sort | Ganesh R. Naik |
| collection | DOAJ |
| container_title | Biosensors |
| description | Effective monitoring of respiratory disturbances during sleep requires a sensor capable of accurately capturing chest movements or airflow displacement. Gold-standard monitoring of sleep and breathing through polysomnography achieves this task through dedicated chest/abdomen bands, thermistors, and nasal flow sensors, and more detailed physiology, evaluations via a nasal mask, pneumotachograph, and airway pressure sensors. However, these measurement approaches can be invasive and time-consuming to perform and analyze. This work compares the performance of a non-invasive wearable stretchable morphic sensor, which does not require direct skin contact, embedded in a t-shirt worn by 32 volunteer participants (26 males, 6 females) with sleep-disordered breathing who performed a detailed, overnight in-laboratory sleep study. Direct comparison of computed respiratory parameters from morphic sensors versus traditional polysomnography had approximately 95% (95 ± 0.7) accuracy. These findings confirm that novel wearable morphic sensors provide a viable alternative to non-invasively and simultaneously capture respiratory rate and chest and abdominal motions. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e28af2a8e02e4d76816098dee01fd466 |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| issn | 2079-6374 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2023-07-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| spelling | doaj-art-e28af2a8e02e4d76816098dee01fd4662025-08-19T22:08:20ZengMDPI AGBiosensors2079-63742023-07-0113770310.3390/bios13070703Morphic Sensors for Respiratory Parameters Estimation: Validation against Overnight PolysomnographyGanesh R. Naik0Paul P. Breen1Titus Jayarathna2Benjamin K. Tong3Danny J. Eckert4Gaetano D. Gargiulo5Adelaide Institute for Sleep Health (Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute: Sleep Health), College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA 5042, AustraliaThe MARCS Institute, Western Sydney University, Westmead, NSW 2145, AustraliaThe MARCS Institute, Western Sydney University, Westmead, NSW 2145, AustraliaNeuroscience Research Australia, Randwick, NSW 2031, AustraliaAdelaide Institute for Sleep Health (Flinders Health and Medical Research Institute: Sleep Health), College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Bedford Park, SA 5042, AustraliaThe MARCS Institute, Western Sydney University, Westmead, NSW 2145, AustraliaEffective monitoring of respiratory disturbances during sleep requires a sensor capable of accurately capturing chest movements or airflow displacement. Gold-standard monitoring of sleep and breathing through polysomnography achieves this task through dedicated chest/abdomen bands, thermistors, and nasal flow sensors, and more detailed physiology, evaluations via a nasal mask, pneumotachograph, and airway pressure sensors. However, these measurement approaches can be invasive and time-consuming to perform and analyze. This work compares the performance of a non-invasive wearable stretchable morphic sensor, which does not require direct skin contact, embedded in a t-shirt worn by 32 volunteer participants (26 males, 6 females) with sleep-disordered breathing who performed a detailed, overnight in-laboratory sleep study. Direct comparison of computed respiratory parameters from morphic sensors versus traditional polysomnography had approximately 95% (95 ± 0.7) accuracy. These findings confirm that novel wearable morphic sensors provide a viable alternative to non-invasively and simultaneously capture respiratory rate and chest and abdominal motions.https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6374/13/7/703morphic sensorrespiratory rateheart ratewearablespolysomnography |
| spellingShingle | Ganesh R. Naik Paul P. Breen Titus Jayarathna Benjamin K. Tong Danny J. Eckert Gaetano D. Gargiulo Morphic Sensors for Respiratory Parameters Estimation: Validation against Overnight Polysomnography morphic sensor respiratory rate heart rate wearables polysomnography |
| title | Morphic Sensors for Respiratory Parameters Estimation: Validation against Overnight Polysomnography |
| title_full | Morphic Sensors for Respiratory Parameters Estimation: Validation against Overnight Polysomnography |
| title_fullStr | Morphic Sensors for Respiratory Parameters Estimation: Validation against Overnight Polysomnography |
| title_full_unstemmed | Morphic Sensors for Respiratory Parameters Estimation: Validation against Overnight Polysomnography |
| title_short | Morphic Sensors for Respiratory Parameters Estimation: Validation against Overnight Polysomnography |
| title_sort | morphic sensors for respiratory parameters estimation validation against overnight polysomnography |
| topic | morphic sensor respiratory rate heart rate wearables polysomnography |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2079-6374/13/7/703 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ganeshrnaik morphicsensorsforrespiratoryparametersestimationvalidationagainstovernightpolysomnography AT paulpbreen morphicsensorsforrespiratoryparametersestimationvalidationagainstovernightpolysomnography AT titusjayarathna morphicsensorsforrespiratoryparametersestimationvalidationagainstovernightpolysomnography AT benjaminktong morphicsensorsforrespiratoryparametersestimationvalidationagainstovernightpolysomnography AT dannyjeckert morphicsensorsforrespiratoryparametersestimationvalidationagainstovernightpolysomnography AT gaetanodgargiulo morphicsensorsforrespiratoryparametersestimationvalidationagainstovernightpolysomnography |
