BALANCING IP RIGHTS AND COMPETITION LAW THROUGH PATENT POOLS IN INDONESIA: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

In 1998, Heller and Eisenberg, discovered the ‘tragedy of the anticommons’ which occurs when there are numerous patent holders who must give their consent before a technology can be used. Consequently, where excessive property rights are claimed, some technology is underused, and innovation is stunt...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Central Banking Law and Institutions
Main Authors: Paripurna Sugarda, Muhammad Rifky Wicaksono
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Bank Indonesia 2021-12-01
Subjects:
Online Access:https://jcli-bi.org/index.php/jcli/article/view/3
_version_ 1849484161688010752
author Paripurna Sugarda
Muhammad Rifky Wicaksono
author_facet Paripurna Sugarda
Muhammad Rifky Wicaksono
author_sort Paripurna Sugarda
collection DOAJ
container_title Journal of Central Banking Law and Institutions
description In 1998, Heller and Eisenberg, discovered the ‘tragedy of the anticommons’ which occurs when there are numerous patent holders who must give their consent before a technology can be used. Consequently, where excessive property rights are claimed, some technology is underused, and innovation is stunted. To solve this issue, the patent owners can aggregate their patents into a single ‘patent pool.’ However, there are significant anticompetitive harms which may arise from such a practice. Hence, this paper aims to answer the question of whether the creation of patent pools as an antidote to the ‘tragedy of anticommons’ would be at the cost of competition law. This research found that it is possible to use patent pools as a solution to the tragedy of the anticommons, while preventing harm to competition. The Indonesian Competition Authority can take inspiration from EU regulations to create a ‘safe harbor’ for companies who engage in technology transfer agreements if they meet the market share thresholds. They can also improve the framework for analyzing patent pools by laying out the different categories of patents to ascertain the different levels of harm they bring to competition.
format Article
id doaj-art-e33132a4fc7e41c8afb236149b75336f
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2827-7775
2809-9885
language English
publishDate 2021-12-01
publisher Bank Indonesia
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-e33132a4fc7e41c8afb236149b75336f2025-08-20T03:11:18ZengBank IndonesiaJournal of Central Banking Law and Institutions2827-77752809-98852021-12-011110311810.21098/jcli.v1i1.33BALANCING IP RIGHTS AND COMPETITION LAW THROUGH PATENT POOLS IN INDONESIA: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSISParipurna Sugarda0Muhammad Rifky Wicaksono1Universitas Gadjah MadaUniversitas Gadjah MadaIn 1998, Heller and Eisenberg, discovered the ‘tragedy of the anticommons’ which occurs when there are numerous patent holders who must give their consent before a technology can be used. Consequently, where excessive property rights are claimed, some technology is underused, and innovation is stunted. To solve this issue, the patent owners can aggregate their patents into a single ‘patent pool.’ However, there are significant anticompetitive harms which may arise from such a practice. Hence, this paper aims to answer the question of whether the creation of patent pools as an antidote to the ‘tragedy of anticommons’ would be at the cost of competition law. This research found that it is possible to use patent pools as a solution to the tragedy of the anticommons, while preventing harm to competition. The Indonesian Competition Authority can take inspiration from EU regulations to create a ‘safe harbor’ for companies who engage in technology transfer agreements if they meet the market share thresholds. They can also improve the framework for analyzing patent pools by laying out the different categories of patents to ascertain the different levels of harm they bring to competition.https://jcli-bi.org/index.php/jcli/article/view/3competition lawpatent poolsintellectual property lawe. u. lawindonesia
spellingShingle Paripurna Sugarda
Muhammad Rifky Wicaksono
BALANCING IP RIGHTS AND COMPETITION LAW THROUGH PATENT POOLS IN INDONESIA: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
competition law
patent pools
intellectual property law
e. u. law
indonesia
title BALANCING IP RIGHTS AND COMPETITION LAW THROUGH PATENT POOLS IN INDONESIA: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
title_full BALANCING IP RIGHTS AND COMPETITION LAW THROUGH PATENT POOLS IN INDONESIA: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
title_fullStr BALANCING IP RIGHTS AND COMPETITION LAW THROUGH PATENT POOLS IN INDONESIA: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
title_full_unstemmed BALANCING IP RIGHTS AND COMPETITION LAW THROUGH PATENT POOLS IN INDONESIA: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
title_short BALANCING IP RIGHTS AND COMPETITION LAW THROUGH PATENT POOLS IN INDONESIA: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS
title_sort balancing ip rights and competition law through patent pools in indonesia a comparative analysis
topic competition law
patent pools
intellectual property law
e. u. law
indonesia
url https://jcli-bi.org/index.php/jcli/article/view/3
work_keys_str_mv AT paripurnasugarda balancingiprightsandcompetitionlawthroughpatentpoolsinindonesiaacomparativeanalysis
AT muhammadrifkywicaksono balancingiprightsandcompetitionlawthroughpatentpoolsinindonesiaacomparativeanalysis