Politically correct hate speech

In the paper we discuss the reasons behind a specific permissiveness of the Polish judicial authorities with regard to hate speech. Hate speech is criminalized by various provisions of the Polish Criminal Code. But as conducted surveys and statistics show, these regulations do not seem to be used ad...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny
Main Authors: Anna Demenko, Michał Urbańczyk
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan 2020-09-01
Subjects:
Online Access:https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/rpeis/article/view/25584
_version_ 1852741300430831616
author Anna Demenko
Michał Urbańczyk
author_facet Anna Demenko
Michał Urbańczyk
author_sort Anna Demenko
collection DOAJ
container_title Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny
description In the paper we discuss the reasons behind a specific permissiveness of the Polish judicial authorities with regard to hate speech. Hate speech is criminalized by various provisions of the Polish Criminal Code. But as conducted surveys and statistics show, these regulations do not seem to be used adequately. The acceptance of hate speech does not necessarily result from the fact that we are a less tolerant society, but also to a large extent, from the fact that the scope of what is allowed to be said, especially publicly, is in Poland very broad. Paradoxically, it seems that in this ‘new democracy’ there is more freedom of speech than in Western countries, where political correctness plays a very important role in public and social life. The lack of responsibility that goes with freedom of speech and of boundaries on what might be expressed in public, the scurrilous language used also by high-ranking officials, influence the rules of socially acceptable behaviour. These rules also influence the scope of what is considered criminal behaviour. When tackling the problem of the acceptance of hate speech, it is also very important to remember that legal acts, especially criminal law, might not necessarily be the best way to change the attitudes in a society. Restrictions on freedom of speech might not only have a freezing effect but also be counterproductive – that which it is prohibited to say tends to be said more. The problem is to strike the right balance between those two possible outcomes.
format Article
id doaj-art-e331b852e3164d74a7c2fc2425253453
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 0035-9629
2543-9170
language English
publishDate 2020-09-01
publisher Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-e331b852e3164d74a7c2fc24252534532025-08-19T21:04:33ZengAdam Mickiewicz University, PoznanRuch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny0035-96292543-91702020-09-0182310.14746/rpeis.2020.82.3.1225584Politically correct hate speechAnna Demenko0Michał Urbańczyk1Adam Mickiewicz University, PoznańAdam Mickiewicz University, PoznańIn the paper we discuss the reasons behind a specific permissiveness of the Polish judicial authorities with regard to hate speech. Hate speech is criminalized by various provisions of the Polish Criminal Code. But as conducted surveys and statistics show, these regulations do not seem to be used adequately. The acceptance of hate speech does not necessarily result from the fact that we are a less tolerant society, but also to a large extent, from the fact that the scope of what is allowed to be said, especially publicly, is in Poland very broad. Paradoxically, it seems that in this ‘new democracy’ there is more freedom of speech than in Western countries, where political correctness plays a very important role in public and social life. The lack of responsibility that goes with freedom of speech and of boundaries on what might be expressed in public, the scurrilous language used also by high-ranking officials, influence the rules of socially acceptable behaviour. These rules also influence the scope of what is considered criminal behaviour. When tackling the problem of the acceptance of hate speech, it is also very important to remember that legal acts, especially criminal law, might not necessarily be the best way to change the attitudes in a society. Restrictions on freedom of speech might not only have a freezing effect but also be counterproductive – that which it is prohibited to say tends to be said more. The problem is to strike the right balance between those two possible outcomes. https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/rpeis/article/view/25584hate speechpolitical correctnesscriminal lawfreedom of speechrules of precaution
spellingShingle Anna Demenko
Michał Urbańczyk
Politically correct hate speech
hate speech
political correctness
criminal law
freedom of speech
rules of precaution
title Politically correct hate speech
title_full Politically correct hate speech
title_fullStr Politically correct hate speech
title_full_unstemmed Politically correct hate speech
title_short Politically correct hate speech
title_sort politically correct hate speech
topic hate speech
political correctness
criminal law
freedom of speech
rules of precaution
url https://pressto.amu.edu.pl/index.php/rpeis/article/view/25584
work_keys_str_mv AT annademenko politicallycorrecthatespeech
AT michałurbanczyk politicallycorrecthatespeech