Comparative Evaluation of Pattern of Anterior Loop of Mandibular Canal in Dentulous and Edentulous Patients Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography: A Cross-Sectional Study

Background: Previous literature has discussed the prevalence of various patterns of anterior loops in male and female populations. We rarely encounter studies examining the patterns of anterior loops in dentulous and edentulous patients. Objective: To determine whether the pattern of the anterior lo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Indian Academy of Oral Medicine and Radiology
Main Authors: Kalyani Khairnar, Chetan Bhadage, Ajay Bhoosreddy, Madhura Barve
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2025-04-01
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jiaomr.jiaomr_365_24
_version_ 1849445606118916096
author Kalyani Khairnar
Chetan Bhadage
Ajay Bhoosreddy
Madhura Barve
author_facet Kalyani Khairnar
Chetan Bhadage
Ajay Bhoosreddy
Madhura Barve
author_sort Kalyani Khairnar
collection DOAJ
container_title Journal of Indian Academy of Oral Medicine and Radiology
description Background: Previous literature has discussed the prevalence of various patterns of anterior loops in male and female populations. We rarely encounter studies examining the patterns of anterior loops in dentulous and edentulous patients. Objective: To determine whether the pattern of the anterior loop of mandibular canal changes due to atrophic changes in edentulous compared to dentulous patients. Methods: 100 cone beam computed tomography scans of 50 dentulous and 50 edentulous patients were included. The mandibular canal was traced bilaterally after converting the data into DICOM format. The anterior loop of the mandibular nerve was classified into three types (I, II, and III) according to the system proposed by Solar et al. (1994). Results: The difference in the pattern of the anterior loop in dentulous and edentulous patients was statistically insignificant. No statistically significant difference was observed in the patterns of the anterior loop between genders. Conclusion: The Type II pattern was most common in dentulous and edentulous groups, with no significant statistical differences in the distribution of patterns. Similarly, Type II was most common in both genders, but the difference was not statistically significant.
format Article
id doaj-art-e398ec21bc22408f8f4b36eeea0c3d91
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 0972-1363
0975-1572
language English
publishDate 2025-04-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-e398ec21bc22408f8f4b36eeea0c3d912025-08-20T03:30:48ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Indian Academy of Oral Medicine and Radiology0972-13630975-15722025-04-0137223123510.4103/jiaomr.jiaomr_365_24Comparative Evaluation of Pattern of Anterior Loop of Mandibular Canal in Dentulous and Edentulous Patients Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography: A Cross-Sectional StudyKalyani KhairnarChetan BhadageAjay BhoosreddyMadhura BarveBackground: Previous literature has discussed the prevalence of various patterns of anterior loops in male and female populations. We rarely encounter studies examining the patterns of anterior loops in dentulous and edentulous patients. Objective: To determine whether the pattern of the anterior loop of mandibular canal changes due to atrophic changes in edentulous compared to dentulous patients. Methods: 100 cone beam computed tomography scans of 50 dentulous and 50 edentulous patients were included. The mandibular canal was traced bilaterally after converting the data into DICOM format. The anterior loop of the mandibular nerve was classified into three types (I, II, and III) according to the system proposed by Solar et al. (1994). Results: The difference in the pattern of the anterior loop in dentulous and edentulous patients was statistically insignificant. No statistically significant difference was observed in the patterns of the anterior loop between genders. Conclusion: The Type II pattern was most common in dentulous and edentulous groups, with no significant statistical differences in the distribution of patterns. Similarly, Type II was most common in both genders, but the difference was not statistically significant.https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jiaomr.jiaomr_365_24atrophyedentulousmandibular canalmandibular nerveprevalence
spellingShingle Kalyani Khairnar
Chetan Bhadage
Ajay Bhoosreddy
Madhura Barve
Comparative Evaluation of Pattern of Anterior Loop of Mandibular Canal in Dentulous and Edentulous Patients Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography: A Cross-Sectional Study
atrophy
edentulous
mandibular canal
mandibular nerve
prevalence
title Comparative Evaluation of Pattern of Anterior Loop of Mandibular Canal in Dentulous and Edentulous Patients Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Pattern of Anterior Loop of Mandibular Canal in Dentulous and Edentulous Patients Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Pattern of Anterior Loop of Mandibular Canal in Dentulous and Edentulous Patients Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Pattern of Anterior Loop of Mandibular Canal in Dentulous and Edentulous Patients Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Pattern of Anterior Loop of Mandibular Canal in Dentulous and Edentulous Patients Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography: A Cross-Sectional Study
title_sort comparative evaluation of pattern of anterior loop of mandibular canal in dentulous and edentulous patients using cone beam computed tomography a cross sectional study
topic atrophy
edentulous
mandibular canal
mandibular nerve
prevalence
url https://journals.lww.com/10.4103/jiaomr.jiaomr_365_24
work_keys_str_mv AT kalyanikhairnar comparativeevaluationofpatternofanteriorloopofmandibularcanalindentulousandedentulouspatientsusingconebeamcomputedtomographyacrosssectionalstudy
AT chetanbhadage comparativeevaluationofpatternofanteriorloopofmandibularcanalindentulousandedentulouspatientsusingconebeamcomputedtomographyacrosssectionalstudy
AT ajaybhoosreddy comparativeevaluationofpatternofanteriorloopofmandibularcanalindentulousandedentulouspatientsusingconebeamcomputedtomographyacrosssectionalstudy
AT madhurabarve comparativeevaluationofpatternofanteriorloopofmandibularcanalindentulousandedentulouspatientsusingconebeamcomputedtomographyacrosssectionalstudy