Cost‐effectiveness of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine plus nab‐paclitaxel in borderline resectable/locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients
Abstract Background The 2020 National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX or neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus nab‐paclitaxel (G‐nP) for borderline resectable/locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (BR/LA PDAC). Aim The purpose of our study was to compare t...
| Published in: | Cancer Reports |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Wiley
2022-09-01
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1565 |
| _version_ | 1856976312766300160 |
|---|---|
| author | Myles A. Ingram Brianna N. Lauren Yoanna Pumpalova Jiheum Park Francesca Lim Susan E. Bates Fay Kastrinos Gulam A. Manji Chung Yin Kong Chin Hur |
| author_facet | Myles A. Ingram Brianna N. Lauren Yoanna Pumpalova Jiheum Park Francesca Lim Susan E. Bates Fay Kastrinos Gulam A. Manji Chung Yin Kong Chin Hur |
| author_sort | Myles A. Ingram |
| collection | DOAJ |
| container_title | Cancer Reports |
| description | Abstract Background The 2020 National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX or neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus nab‐paclitaxel (G‐nP) for borderline resectable/locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (BR/LA PDAC). Aim The purpose of our study was to compare treatment outcomes, toxicity profiles, costs, and quality‐of‐life measures between these two treatments to further inform clinical decision‐making. Methods and Results We developed a decision‐analytic mathematical model to compare the total cost and health outcomes of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX against G‐nP over 12 years. The model inputs were estimated using clinical trial data and published literature. The primary endpoint was incremental cost‐effectiveness ratios (ICERs) with a willingness‐to‐pay threshold of $100 000 per quality‐adjusted‐life‐year (QALY). Secondary endpoints included overall (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS), total cost of care, QALYs, PDAC resection rate, and monthly treatment‐related adverse events (TRAE) costs (USD). FOLFIRINOX was the cost‐effective strategy, with an ICER of $60856.47 per QALY when compared to G‐nP. G‐nP had an ICER of $44639.71 per QALY when compared to natural history. For clinical outcomes, more patients underwent an “R0” resection with FOLFIRINOX compared to G‐nP (84.9 vs. 81.0%), but FOLFIRINOX had higher TRAE costs than G‐nP ($10905.19 vs. $4894.11). A one‐way sensitivity analysis found that the ICER of FOLFIRINOX exceeded the threshold when TRAE costs were higher or PDAC recurrence rates were lower. Conclusion Our modeling analysis suggests that FOLFIRNOX is the cost‐effective treatment compared to G‐nP for BR/LA PDAC despite having a higher cost of total care due to TRAE costs. Trial data with sufficient follow‐up are needed to confirm our findings. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e421dd6448d6472fab80e7690d3e02c8 |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| issn | 2573-8348 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2022-09-01 |
| publisher | Wiley |
| record_format | Article |
| spelling | doaj-art-e421dd6448d6472fab80e7690d3e02c82025-08-19T19:58:24ZengWileyCancer Reports2573-83482022-09-0159n/an/a10.1002/cnr2.1565Cost‐effectiveness of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine plus nab‐paclitaxel in borderline resectable/locally advanced pancreatic cancer patientsMyles A. Ingram0Brianna N. Lauren1Yoanna Pumpalova2Jiheum Park3Francesca Lim4Susan E. Bates5Fay Kastrinos6Gulam A. Manji7Chung Yin Kong8Chin Hur9Division of General Medicine Columbia University Irving Medical Cancer and the Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons New York New York USADivision of General Medicine Columbia University Irving Medical Cancer and the Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons New York New York USADepartment of Medicine, Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons Columbia University New York New York USADivision of General Medicine Columbia University Irving Medical Cancer and the Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons New York New York USADivision of General Medicine Columbia University Irving Medical Cancer and the Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons New York New York USAHerbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center Columbia University Irving Medical Center New York New York USAHerbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center Columbia University Irving Medical Center New York New York USAHerbert Irving Comprehensive Cancer Center Columbia University Irving Medical Center New York New York USADivision of General Medicine Mount Sinai School of Medicine New York New York USADivision of General Medicine Columbia University Irving Medical Cancer and the Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons New York New York USAAbstract Background The 2020 National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines recommend neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX or neoadjuvant gemcitabine plus nab‐paclitaxel (G‐nP) for borderline resectable/locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (BR/LA PDAC). Aim The purpose of our study was to compare treatment outcomes, toxicity profiles, costs, and quality‐of‐life measures between these two treatments to further inform clinical decision‐making. Methods and Results We developed a decision‐analytic mathematical model to compare the total cost and health outcomes of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX against G‐nP over 12 years. The model inputs were estimated using clinical trial data and published literature. The primary endpoint was incremental cost‐effectiveness ratios (ICERs) with a willingness‐to‐pay threshold of $100 000 per quality‐adjusted‐life‐year (QALY). Secondary endpoints included overall (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS), total cost of care, QALYs, PDAC resection rate, and monthly treatment‐related adverse events (TRAE) costs (USD). FOLFIRINOX was the cost‐effective strategy, with an ICER of $60856.47 per QALY when compared to G‐nP. G‐nP had an ICER of $44639.71 per QALY when compared to natural history. For clinical outcomes, more patients underwent an “R0” resection with FOLFIRINOX compared to G‐nP (84.9 vs. 81.0%), but FOLFIRINOX had higher TRAE costs than G‐nP ($10905.19 vs. $4894.11). A one‐way sensitivity analysis found that the ICER of FOLFIRINOX exceeded the threshold when TRAE costs were higher or PDAC recurrence rates were lower. Conclusion Our modeling analysis suggests that FOLFIRNOX is the cost‐effective treatment compared to G‐nP for BR/LA PDAC despite having a higher cost of total care due to TRAE costs. Trial data with sufficient follow‐up are needed to confirm our findings.https://doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1565chemotherapyclinical cancer researchpancreatic cancer |
| spellingShingle | Myles A. Ingram Brianna N. Lauren Yoanna Pumpalova Jiheum Park Francesca Lim Susan E. Bates Fay Kastrinos Gulam A. Manji Chung Yin Kong Chin Hur Cost‐effectiveness of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine plus nab‐paclitaxel in borderline resectable/locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients chemotherapy clinical cancer research pancreatic cancer |
| title | Cost‐effectiveness of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine plus nab‐paclitaxel in borderline resectable/locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients |
| title_full | Cost‐effectiveness of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine plus nab‐paclitaxel in borderline resectable/locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients |
| title_fullStr | Cost‐effectiveness of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine plus nab‐paclitaxel in borderline resectable/locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients |
| title_full_unstemmed | Cost‐effectiveness of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine plus nab‐paclitaxel in borderline resectable/locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients |
| title_short | Cost‐effectiveness of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX versus gemcitabine plus nab‐paclitaxel in borderline resectable/locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients |
| title_sort | cost effectiveness of neoadjuvant folfirinox versus gemcitabine plus nab paclitaxel in borderline resectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer patients |
| topic | chemotherapy clinical cancer research pancreatic cancer |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1002/cnr2.1565 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mylesaingram costeffectivenessofneoadjuvantfolfirinoxversusgemcitabineplusnabpaclitaxelinborderlineresectablelocallyadvancedpancreaticcancerpatients AT briannanlauren costeffectivenessofneoadjuvantfolfirinoxversusgemcitabineplusnabpaclitaxelinborderlineresectablelocallyadvancedpancreaticcancerpatients AT yoannapumpalova costeffectivenessofneoadjuvantfolfirinoxversusgemcitabineplusnabpaclitaxelinborderlineresectablelocallyadvancedpancreaticcancerpatients AT jiheumpark costeffectivenessofneoadjuvantfolfirinoxversusgemcitabineplusnabpaclitaxelinborderlineresectablelocallyadvancedpancreaticcancerpatients AT francescalim costeffectivenessofneoadjuvantfolfirinoxversusgemcitabineplusnabpaclitaxelinborderlineresectablelocallyadvancedpancreaticcancerpatients AT susanebates costeffectivenessofneoadjuvantfolfirinoxversusgemcitabineplusnabpaclitaxelinborderlineresectablelocallyadvancedpancreaticcancerpatients AT faykastrinos costeffectivenessofneoadjuvantfolfirinoxversusgemcitabineplusnabpaclitaxelinborderlineresectablelocallyadvancedpancreaticcancerpatients AT gulamamanji costeffectivenessofneoadjuvantfolfirinoxversusgemcitabineplusnabpaclitaxelinborderlineresectablelocallyadvancedpancreaticcancerpatients AT chungyinkong costeffectivenessofneoadjuvantfolfirinoxversusgemcitabineplusnabpaclitaxelinborderlineresectablelocallyadvancedpancreaticcancerpatients AT chinhur costeffectivenessofneoadjuvantfolfirinoxversusgemcitabineplusnabpaclitaxelinborderlineresectablelocallyadvancedpancreaticcancerpatients |
