Estimating seepage losses from lined irrigation canals using nonlinear regression and artificial neural network models

Abstract The Slide2 model was used to estimate seepage losses from canals after validation considering different canal geometries, lining thicknesses, and lining materials. SPSS was used to develop three models: NLR, MLP-ANN, and RBF-ANN. MATLAB software was used to write down the script code for th...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Applied Water Science
Main Authors: Tarek Selim, Mohamed Kamel Elshaarawy, Mohamed Elkiki, Mohamed Galal Eltarabily
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2024-04-01
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-024-02142-1
_version_ 1850359139879878656
author Tarek Selim
Mohamed Kamel Elshaarawy
Mohamed Elkiki
Mohamed Galal Eltarabily
author_facet Tarek Selim
Mohamed Kamel Elshaarawy
Mohamed Elkiki
Mohamed Galal Eltarabily
author_sort Tarek Selim
collection DOAJ
container_title Applied Water Science
description Abstract The Slide2 model was used to estimate seepage losses from canals after validation considering different canal geometries, lining thicknesses, and lining materials. SPSS was used to develop three models: NLR, MLP-ANN, and RBF-ANN. MATLAB software was used to write down the script code for the ANNs. Results showed that seepage losses were highly increased when the liner had high hydraulic conductivity, while with the increase of lining thickness, a noticeable reduction in seepage losses was obtained. The canal's side slope had a minimal effect on the seepage losses. Moreover, the MLP-ANN and RBF-ANN models performed better than the NLR model with determination coefficient (R 2) of 0.996 and 0.965; Root-Mean-Square-Error (RMSE) of 1.172 and 0.699; Mean-Absolute-Error (MAE) of  0.139 and 0.528; index of agreement (d) = 0.999 and 0.991, respectively. The NLR model had lower values of R 2 = 0.906, RMSE = 1.198, MAE = 0.942, and d = 0.971. Thus, ANNs are recommended as a robust, easy, simple, and rapid tool for estimating seepage losses from lined trapezoidal irrigation canals.
format Article
id doaj-art-e43ddff2cb1a4d16a911b7166d879b91
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2190-5487
2190-5495
language English
publishDate 2024-04-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-e43ddff2cb1a4d16a911b7166d879b912025-08-19T23:06:05ZengSpringerOpenApplied Water Science2190-54872190-54952024-04-0114511210.1007/s13201-024-02142-1Estimating seepage losses from lined irrigation canals using nonlinear regression and artificial neural network modelsTarek Selim0Mohamed Kamel Elshaarawy1Mohamed Elkiki2Mohamed Galal Eltarabily3Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Port Said UniversityCivil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Horus University-EgyptCivil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Port Said UniversityCivil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Port Said UniversityAbstract The Slide2 model was used to estimate seepage losses from canals after validation considering different canal geometries, lining thicknesses, and lining materials. SPSS was used to develop three models: NLR, MLP-ANN, and RBF-ANN. MATLAB software was used to write down the script code for the ANNs. Results showed that seepage losses were highly increased when the liner had high hydraulic conductivity, while with the increase of lining thickness, a noticeable reduction in seepage losses was obtained. The canal's side slope had a minimal effect on the seepage losses. Moreover, the MLP-ANN and RBF-ANN models performed better than the NLR model with determination coefficient (R 2) of 0.996 and 0.965; Root-Mean-Square-Error (RMSE) of 1.172 and 0.699; Mean-Absolute-Error (MAE) of  0.139 and 0.528; index of agreement (d) = 0.999 and 0.991, respectively. The NLR model had lower values of R 2 = 0.906, RMSE = 1.198, MAE = 0.942, and d = 0.971. Thus, ANNs are recommended as a robust, easy, simple, and rapid tool for estimating seepage losses from lined trapezoidal irrigation canals.https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-024-02142-1SeepageSlide2 modelRegression analysisSPSSMLP-ANNRBF-ANN
spellingShingle Tarek Selim
Mohamed Kamel Elshaarawy
Mohamed Elkiki
Mohamed Galal Eltarabily
Estimating seepage losses from lined irrigation canals using nonlinear regression and artificial neural network models
Seepage
Slide2 model
Regression analysis
SPSS
MLP-ANN
RBF-ANN
title Estimating seepage losses from lined irrigation canals using nonlinear regression and artificial neural network models
title_full Estimating seepage losses from lined irrigation canals using nonlinear regression and artificial neural network models
title_fullStr Estimating seepage losses from lined irrigation canals using nonlinear regression and artificial neural network models
title_full_unstemmed Estimating seepage losses from lined irrigation canals using nonlinear regression and artificial neural network models
title_short Estimating seepage losses from lined irrigation canals using nonlinear regression and artificial neural network models
title_sort estimating seepage losses from lined irrigation canals using nonlinear regression and artificial neural network models
topic Seepage
Slide2 model
Regression analysis
SPSS
MLP-ANN
RBF-ANN
url https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-024-02142-1
work_keys_str_mv AT tarekselim estimatingseepagelossesfromlinedirrigationcanalsusingnonlinearregressionandartificialneuralnetworkmodels
AT mohamedkamelelshaarawy estimatingseepagelossesfromlinedirrigationcanalsusingnonlinearregressionandartificialneuralnetworkmodels
AT mohamedelkiki estimatingseepagelossesfromlinedirrigationcanalsusingnonlinearregressionandartificialneuralnetworkmodels
AT mohamedgalaleltarabily estimatingseepagelossesfromlinedirrigationcanalsusingnonlinearregressionandartificialneuralnetworkmodels