Metaphysical stuctures and holism: Reply to Schaffer

This paper deals with Schaffer’s distinction between metaphysical structures, as well as his appeal for the revival of neo-Aristotelian approaches that imply ordered structure, based on the criticism of Quine’s method that, in his view, implies flat metaphysical structure. However, although...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Filozofija i Društvo
Main Author: Bogdanović Miloš
Format: Article
Language:German
Published: Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, Belgrade 2025-01-01
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2025/0353-57382503761B.pdf
_version_ 1848762758298861568
author Bogdanović Miloš
author_facet Bogdanović Miloš
author_sort Bogdanović Miloš
collection DOAJ
container_title Filozofija i Društvo
description This paper deals with Schaffer’s distinction between metaphysical structures, as well as his appeal for the revival of neo-Aristotelian approaches that imply ordered structure, based on the criticism of Quine’s method that, in his view, implies flat metaphysical structure. However, although I believe that Schaffer’s distinction between metaphysical structures is an interesting and, basically, acceptable view, I will try to show that Schaffer’s arguments are not convincing enough to persuade us to abandon Quine’s method and adopt the Aristotelian metaphysical model. Moreover, when mistakes that Schaffer makes are corrected and Quine’s method is given due attention, we will see that this can enable us to have a more tenable interpretation of the concepts that Schaffer speaks of (metaphysical structures), but also - as in his case - to draw certain conclusions that go beyond the objectives of classification as such.
format Article
id doaj-art-e43f60e72f7e44ee99db89f999752ea2
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 0353-5738
2334-8577
language deu
publishDate 2025-01-01
publisher Institute for Philosophy and Social Theory, Belgrade
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-e43f60e72f7e44ee99db89f999752ea22025-10-09T07:11:58ZdeuInstitute for Philosophy and Social Theory, BelgradeFilozofija i Društvo0353-57382334-85772025-01-0136376177810.2298/FID2503761B0353-57382503761BMetaphysical stuctures and holism: Reply to SchafferBogdanović Miloš0https://orcid.org/0009-0002-1350-370XMuseum of Yugoslavia, BelgradeThis paper deals with Schaffer’s distinction between metaphysical structures, as well as his appeal for the revival of neo-Aristotelian approaches that imply ordered structure, based on the criticism of Quine’s method that, in his view, implies flat metaphysical structure. However, although I believe that Schaffer’s distinction between metaphysical structures is an interesting and, basically, acceptable view, I will try to show that Schaffer’s arguments are not convincing enough to persuade us to abandon Quine’s method and adopt the Aristotelian metaphysical model. Moreover, when mistakes that Schaffer makes are corrected and Quine’s method is given due attention, we will see that this can enable us to have a more tenable interpretation of the concepts that Schaffer speaks of (metaphysical structures), but also - as in his case - to draw certain conclusions that go beyond the objectives of classification as such.https://doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2025/0353-57382503761B.pdfflatsortedordered metaphysical (ontological) structurequineschaffercarnapintuitionsontologymetaphysics
spellingShingle Bogdanović Miloš
Metaphysical stuctures and holism: Reply to Schaffer
flat
sorted
ordered metaphysical (ontological) structure
quine
schaffer
carnap
intuitions
ontology
metaphysics
title Metaphysical stuctures and holism: Reply to Schaffer
title_full Metaphysical stuctures and holism: Reply to Schaffer
title_fullStr Metaphysical stuctures and holism: Reply to Schaffer
title_full_unstemmed Metaphysical stuctures and holism: Reply to Schaffer
title_short Metaphysical stuctures and holism: Reply to Schaffer
title_sort metaphysical stuctures and holism reply to schaffer
topic flat
sorted
ordered metaphysical (ontological) structure
quine
schaffer
carnap
intuitions
ontology
metaphysics
url https://doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/0353-5738/2025/0353-57382503761B.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT bogdanovicmilos metaphysicalstucturesandholismreplytoschaffer