Are older people putting themselves at risk when using their walking frames?

Abstract Background Walking aids are issued to older adults to prevent falls, however, paradoxically their use has been identified as a risk factor for falling. To prevent falls, walking aids must be used in a stable manner, but it remains unknown to what extent associated clinical guidance is adher...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMC Geriatrics
Main Authors: Sibylle Brunhilde Thies, Alex Bates, Eleonora Costamagna, Laurence Kenney, Malcolm Granat, Jo Webb, Dave Howard, Rose Baker, Helen Dawes
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: BMC 2020-03-01
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12877-020-1450-2
_version_ 1856958823863943168
author Sibylle Brunhilde Thies
Alex Bates
Eleonora Costamagna
Laurence Kenney
Malcolm Granat
Jo Webb
Dave Howard
Rose Baker
Helen Dawes
author_facet Sibylle Brunhilde Thies
Alex Bates
Eleonora Costamagna
Laurence Kenney
Malcolm Granat
Jo Webb
Dave Howard
Rose Baker
Helen Dawes
author_sort Sibylle Brunhilde Thies
collection DOAJ
container_title BMC Geriatrics
description Abstract Background Walking aids are issued to older adults to prevent falls, however, paradoxically their use has been identified as a risk factor for falling. To prevent falls, walking aids must be used in a stable manner, but it remains unknown to what extent associated clinical guidance is adhered to at home, and whether following guidance facilitates a stable walking pattern. It was the aim of this study to investigate adherence to guidance on walking frame use, and to quantify user stability whilst using walking frames. Additionally, we explored the views of users and healthcare professionals on walking aid use, and regarding the instrumented walking frames (‘Smart Walkers’) utilized in this study. Methods This observational study used Smart Walkers and pressure-sensing insoles to investigate usage patterns of 17 older people in their home environment; corresponding video captured contextual information. Additionally, stability when following, or not, clinical guidance was quantified for a subset of users during walking in an Activities of Daily Living Flat and in a gait laboratory. Two focus groups (users, healthcare professionals) shared their experiences with walking aids and provided feedback on the Smart Walkers. Results Incorrect use was observed for 16% of single support periods and for 29% of dual support periods, and was associated with environmental constraints and a specific frame design feature. Incorrect use was associated with reduced stability. Participants and healthcare professionals perceived the Smart Walker technology positively. Conclusions Clinical guidance cannot easily be adhered to and self-selected strategies reduce stability, hence are placing the user at risk. Current guidance needs to be improved to address environmental constraints whilst facilitating stable walking. The research is highly relevant considering the rising number of walking aid users, their increased falls-risk, and the costs of falls.
format Article
id doaj-art-e4550f39a4c544bab978effebe8affef
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 1471-2318
language English
publishDate 2020-03-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-e4550f39a4c544bab978effebe8affef2025-08-19T20:04:24ZengBMCBMC Geriatrics1471-23182020-03-0120111110.1186/s12877-020-1450-2Are older people putting themselves at risk when using their walking frames?Sibylle Brunhilde Thies0Alex Bates1Eleonora Costamagna2Laurence Kenney3Malcolm Granat4Jo Webb5Dave Howard6Rose Baker7Helen Dawes8Centre for Health Sciences Research, School of Health & Society, University of SalfordCentre for Health Sciences Research, School of Health & Society, University of SalfordCentre for Health Sciences Research, School of Health & Society, University of SalfordCentre for Health Sciences Research, School of Health & Society, University of SalfordCentre for Health Sciences Research, School of Health & Society, University of SalfordCentre for Health Sciences Research, School of Health & Society, University of SalfordCentre for Health Sciences Research, School of Health & Society, University of SalfordSchool of Business, University of SalfordCentre for Movement, Occupational and Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Oxford Brookes UniversityAbstract Background Walking aids are issued to older adults to prevent falls, however, paradoxically their use has been identified as a risk factor for falling. To prevent falls, walking aids must be used in a stable manner, but it remains unknown to what extent associated clinical guidance is adhered to at home, and whether following guidance facilitates a stable walking pattern. It was the aim of this study to investigate adherence to guidance on walking frame use, and to quantify user stability whilst using walking frames. Additionally, we explored the views of users and healthcare professionals on walking aid use, and regarding the instrumented walking frames (‘Smart Walkers’) utilized in this study. Methods This observational study used Smart Walkers and pressure-sensing insoles to investigate usage patterns of 17 older people in their home environment; corresponding video captured contextual information. Additionally, stability when following, or not, clinical guidance was quantified for a subset of users during walking in an Activities of Daily Living Flat and in a gait laboratory. Two focus groups (users, healthcare professionals) shared their experiences with walking aids and provided feedback on the Smart Walkers. Results Incorrect use was observed for 16% of single support periods and for 29% of dual support periods, and was associated with environmental constraints and a specific frame design feature. Incorrect use was associated with reduced stability. Participants and healthcare professionals perceived the Smart Walker technology positively. Conclusions Clinical guidance cannot easily be adhered to and self-selected strategies reduce stability, hence are placing the user at risk. Current guidance needs to be improved to address environmental constraints whilst facilitating stable walking. The research is highly relevant considering the rising number of walking aid users, their increased falls-risk, and the costs of falls.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12877-020-1450-2Older adultsWalking aidsStabilityFalls
spellingShingle Sibylle Brunhilde Thies
Alex Bates
Eleonora Costamagna
Laurence Kenney
Malcolm Granat
Jo Webb
Dave Howard
Rose Baker
Helen Dawes
Are older people putting themselves at risk when using their walking frames?
Older adults
Walking aids
Stability
Falls
title Are older people putting themselves at risk when using their walking frames?
title_full Are older people putting themselves at risk when using their walking frames?
title_fullStr Are older people putting themselves at risk when using their walking frames?
title_full_unstemmed Are older people putting themselves at risk when using their walking frames?
title_short Are older people putting themselves at risk when using their walking frames?
title_sort are older people putting themselves at risk when using their walking frames
topic Older adults
Walking aids
Stability
Falls
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12877-020-1450-2
work_keys_str_mv AT sibyllebrunhildethies areolderpeopleputtingthemselvesatriskwhenusingtheirwalkingframes
AT alexbates areolderpeopleputtingthemselvesatriskwhenusingtheirwalkingframes
AT eleonoracostamagna areolderpeopleputtingthemselvesatriskwhenusingtheirwalkingframes
AT laurencekenney areolderpeopleputtingthemselvesatriskwhenusingtheirwalkingframes
AT malcolmgranat areolderpeopleputtingthemselvesatriskwhenusingtheirwalkingframes
AT jowebb areolderpeopleputtingthemselvesatriskwhenusingtheirwalkingframes
AT davehoward areolderpeopleputtingthemselvesatriskwhenusingtheirwalkingframes
AT rosebaker areolderpeopleputtingthemselvesatriskwhenusingtheirwalkingframes
AT helendawes areolderpeopleputtingthemselvesatriskwhenusingtheirwalkingframes