First dorsal metacarpal artery (FDMA) flaps: A novel classification system incorporating various modifications and subtypes—a 5 year retrospective comparative study

• الحاوية / القاعدة: JPRAS Open
• المؤلفون الرئيسيون: Mir Yasir, Hillal Ahmad Bhat, Eidan Bilal, Mir Mohsin, Peerzada Umar Farooq, Haroon Rashid Zargar, Altaf Rasool, Jaswinder Kaur, Mohsin Saleem Khan, Sheikh Adil Bashir, Adil Hafeez Wani
• التنسيق: مقال
• اللغة: الإنجليزية
• منشور في: Elsevier 2025-12-01
• الموضوعات: First dorsal metacarpal artery (FDMA) flap; Thumb reconstruction; Extended FDMA flap; FDMA flap classification
• الوصول للمادة أونلاين: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352587825001536

Summary: Introduction: The first dorsal metacarpal artery (FDMA) flap, including its extended versions, is a reliable and versatile option for reconstructing thumb defects. However, a structured and practical classification system for its various modifications has been lacking. Objectives: This study aimed to assess the versatility of the FDMA flap and its modifications in managing a range of thumb defects and to propose a novel, clinically applicable classification system to facilitate flap selection and improve outcomes. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted over five years at a tertiary care referral hospital with a specialized hand unit. A total of 29 patients with thumb defects underwent FDMA flap reconstruction. Flaps were classified into five types: • Type I Islanded flap, up to PIP joint; subtypes It (tunneled) Is (split skin) • Type II Peninsular flap, up to PIP joint • Type III Extended islanded flap beyond PIP joint; subtypes IIIt (tunneled), IIIs (split skin), • Type IV Extended peninsular flap beyond PIP joint, and • Type V Other modifications, e.g., reverse flaps or bilobed flaps (not used in this study). • Data on flap survival, complications, hospital stay, and 6-month patient satisfaction were analyzed. Results: Defect sizes ranged from 2 × 3.5 cm to 4 × 5.5 cm. The majority of patients were young male industrial and carpentry workers. Flap distribution was as follows: Type I (12 cases: 9 It, 3 Is), Type II (4 cases), Type III (7 cases: 4 IIIt, 3 IIIs), and Type IV (6 cases). Flap survival was highest in peninsular and split-skin flaps, while Type IIIt flaps showed the highest complication rate (odds ratio [OR] 5.0, p = 0.03). Overall, 79.3 % of patients reported high satisfaction at 6 months. Conclusion: The FDMA flap, including its various modifications, remains a versatile and reliable option for thumb reconstruction. The proposed classification system offers a simple, clinically relevant framework to guide flap selection based on defect characteristics, which may help minimize complications and improve clinical outcomes.