Subcortical Contribution to Late TMS-induced I-waves in Intact Humans

Paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the human motor cortex results in consecutive facilitatory motor evoked potential (MEP) peaks in surface electromyography. It has been proposed that early and late MEP peaks involve different mechanisms of action, however, little is known about...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
Main Authors: John eCirillo, Monica A. Perez
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2015-05-01
Subjects:
Online Access:http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnint.2015.00038/full
_version_ 1856981365413642240
author John eCirillo
Monica A. Perez
Monica A. Perez
author_facet John eCirillo
Monica A. Perez
Monica A. Perez
author_sort John eCirillo
collection DOAJ
container_title Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience
description Paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the human motor cortex results in consecutive facilitatory motor evoked potential (MEP) peaks in surface electromyography. It has been proposed that early and late MEP peaks involve different mechanisms of action, however, little is known about the characteristics of the later peaks. Using paired-pulse TMS over the hand motor cortex at different test (S1) and conditioning (S2) interstimulus intervals and intensities we examined early (first) and late (second and third) MEP peaks in a resting finger muscle. We demonstrate that the third peak had reduced amplitude and duration compared to the second, regardless of the S1 intensity. Higher S2 intensity increased the amplitude of the third but not the second peak, suggesting that the third peak had a higher threshold. The interval between the second and third peak was longer than between the first and second peaks in all conditions even though all peaks had similar latency dispersion. No differences were found in the amplitude, duration, and threshold of the first and second peaks. A threshold electrical S2 over the cervicomedullary junction facilitated the second and third but not the first peak similarly to TMS. Our results indicate that the third MEP peak is smaller and has higher threshold than the second peak and the similarities between the first and second peaks suggest that this is less likely explained by a reduced effectiveness in recruitment. We argue that subcortical pathways might contribute to differences found between late TMS-induced peaks in intact humans.
format Article
id doaj-art-e4eb542aa8894f2eade4aa568bdee446
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 1662-5145
language English
publishDate 2015-05-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-e4eb542aa8894f2eade4aa568bdee4462025-08-19T19:56:51ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience1662-51452015-05-01910.3389/fnint.2015.00038138733Subcortical Contribution to Late TMS-induced I-waves in Intact HumansJohn eCirillo0Monica A. Perez1Monica A. Perez2University of PittsburghUniversity of PittsburghThe Miami Project to Cure Paralysis, University of MiamiPaired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of the human motor cortex results in consecutive facilitatory motor evoked potential (MEP) peaks in surface electromyography. It has been proposed that early and late MEP peaks involve different mechanisms of action, however, little is known about the characteristics of the later peaks. Using paired-pulse TMS over the hand motor cortex at different test (S1) and conditioning (S2) interstimulus intervals and intensities we examined early (first) and late (second and third) MEP peaks in a resting finger muscle. We demonstrate that the third peak had reduced amplitude and duration compared to the second, regardless of the S1 intensity. Higher S2 intensity increased the amplitude of the third but not the second peak, suggesting that the third peak had a higher threshold. The interval between the second and third peak was longer than between the first and second peaks in all conditions even though all peaks had similar latency dispersion. No differences were found in the amplitude, duration, and threshold of the first and second peaks. A threshold electrical S2 over the cervicomedullary junction facilitated the second and third but not the first peak similarly to TMS. Our results indicate that the third MEP peak is smaller and has higher threshold than the second peak and the similarities between the first and second peaks suggest that this is less likely explained by a reduced effectiveness in recruitment. We argue that subcortical pathways might contribute to differences found between late TMS-induced peaks in intact humans.http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnint.2015.00038/fullTranscranial Magnetic Stimulationprimary motor cortexCorticospinal volleysI-wave facilitationpaired-pulse.
spellingShingle John eCirillo
Monica A. Perez
Monica A. Perez
Subcortical Contribution to Late TMS-induced I-waves in Intact Humans
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
primary motor cortex
Corticospinal volleys
I-wave facilitation
paired-pulse.
title Subcortical Contribution to Late TMS-induced I-waves in Intact Humans
title_full Subcortical Contribution to Late TMS-induced I-waves in Intact Humans
title_fullStr Subcortical Contribution to Late TMS-induced I-waves in Intact Humans
title_full_unstemmed Subcortical Contribution to Late TMS-induced I-waves in Intact Humans
title_short Subcortical Contribution to Late TMS-induced I-waves in Intact Humans
title_sort subcortical contribution to late tms induced i waves in intact humans
topic Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
primary motor cortex
Corticospinal volleys
I-wave facilitation
paired-pulse.
url http://journal.frontiersin.org/Journal/10.3389/fnint.2015.00038/full
work_keys_str_mv AT johnecirillo subcorticalcontributiontolatetmsinducediwavesinintacthumans
AT monicaaperez subcorticalcontributiontolatetmsinducediwavesinintacthumans
AT monicaaperez subcorticalcontributiontolatetmsinducediwavesinintacthumans