Tocilizumab or glucocorticoids treatment for patients with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia: An observational study

Objective: To estimate the effect of tocilizumab or glucocorticoids in preventing death and intubation in patients hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study enrolling all consecutive patients hospitalized at Reggio Emilia AUSL between February the 11th an...

詳細記述

書誌詳細
出版年:Brazilian Journal of Infectious Diseases
主要な著者: Giovanni Dolci, Giulia Cassone, Giulia Besutti, Romina Corsini, Fabio Sampaolesi, Valentina Iotti, Elena Galli, Adalgisa Palermo, Matteo Fontana, Pamela Mancuso
フォーマット: 論文
言語:英語
出版事項: Elsevier 2022-01-01
主題:
オンライン・アクセス:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1413867021001719
その他の書誌記述
要約:Objective: To estimate the effect of tocilizumab or glucocorticoids in preventing death and intubation in patients hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 pneumonia. Methods: This was a retrospective cohort study enrolling all consecutive patients hospitalized at Reggio Emilia AUSL between February the 11th and April 14th 2020 for severe COVID-19 and treated with tocilizumab or glucocorticoids (at least 80 mg/day of methylprednisolone or equivalent for at least 3 days).The primary outcome was death within 30 days from the start of the considered therapies. The secondary outcome was a composite outcome of death and/or intubation. All patients have been followed-up until May 19th 2020, with a follow-up of at least 30 days for every patient.To reduce confounding due to potential non-comparability of the two groups, those receiving tocilizumab and those receiving glucocorticoids, a propensity score was calculated as the inverse probability weighting of receiving treatment conditional on the baseline covariates. Results and conclusion: Therapy with tocilizumab alone was associated with a reduction of deaths (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.21-1.17) and of the composite outcome death/intubation (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.13-0.90) compared to glucocorticoids alone. Nevertheless, this result should be cautiously interpreted due to a potential prescription bias.
ISSN:1413-8670