Dynamic Maize Yield Predictions Using Machine Learning on Multi-Source Data
Timely yield prediction is crucial for the agri-food supply chain as a whole. However, different stakeholders in the agri-food sector require different levels of accuracy and lead times in which a yield prediction should be available. For the producers, predictions during the growing season are esse...
| Published in: | Remote Sensing |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2022-12-01
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/1/100 |
| _version_ | 1850327617724481536 |
|---|---|
| author | Michele Croci Giorgio Impollonia Michele Meroni Stefano Amaducci |
| author_facet | Michele Croci Giorgio Impollonia Michele Meroni Stefano Amaducci |
| author_sort | Michele Croci |
| collection | DOAJ |
| container_title | Remote Sensing |
| description | Timely yield prediction is crucial for the agri-food supply chain as a whole. However, different stakeholders in the agri-food sector require different levels of accuracy and lead times in which a yield prediction should be available. For the producers, predictions during the growing season are essential to ensure that information is available early enough for the timely implementation of agronomic decisions, while industries can wait until later in the season to optimize their production process and increase their production traceability. In this study, we used machine learning algorithms, dynamic and static predictors, and a phenology approach to determine the time for issuing the yield prediction. In addition, the effect of data reduction was evaluated by comparing results obtained with and without principal component analysis (PCA). Gaussian process regression (GPR) was the best for predicting maize yield. Its best performance (nRMSE of 13.31%) was obtained late in the season and with the full set of predictors (vegetation indices, meteorological and soil predictors). In contrast, neural network (NNET) and support vector machines linear basis function (SVMl) achieved their best accuracy with only vegetation indices and at the tasseling phenological stage. Only slight differences in performance were observed between the algorithms considered, highlighting that the main factors influencing performance are the timing of the yield prediction and the predictors with which the machine learning algorithms are fed. Interestingly, PCA was instrumental in increasing the performances of NNET after this stage. An additional benefit of the application of PCA was the overall reduction between 12 and 30.20% in the standard deviation of the maize yield prediction performance from the leave one-year outer-loop cross-validation, depending on the feature set. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e50d1d7744534c6bbacc656ddacefc77 |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| issn | 2072-4292 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2022-12-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| spelling | doaj-art-e50d1d7744534c6bbacc656ddacefc772025-08-19T23:19:42ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922022-12-0115110010.3390/rs15010100Dynamic Maize Yield Predictions Using Machine Learning on Multi-Source DataMichele Croci0Giorgio Impollonia1Michele Meroni2Stefano Amaducci3Department of Sustainable Crop Production, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 29122 Piacenza, ItalyDepartment of Sustainable Crop Production, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 29122 Piacenza, ItalyEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Via E. Fermi 2749, 21027 Ispra, ItalyDepartment of Sustainable Crop Production, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 29122 Piacenza, ItalyTimely yield prediction is crucial for the agri-food supply chain as a whole. However, different stakeholders in the agri-food sector require different levels of accuracy and lead times in which a yield prediction should be available. For the producers, predictions during the growing season are essential to ensure that information is available early enough for the timely implementation of agronomic decisions, while industries can wait until later in the season to optimize their production process and increase their production traceability. In this study, we used machine learning algorithms, dynamic and static predictors, and a phenology approach to determine the time for issuing the yield prediction. In addition, the effect of data reduction was evaluated by comparing results obtained with and without principal component analysis (PCA). Gaussian process regression (GPR) was the best for predicting maize yield. Its best performance (nRMSE of 13.31%) was obtained late in the season and with the full set of predictors (vegetation indices, meteorological and soil predictors). In contrast, neural network (NNET) and support vector machines linear basis function (SVMl) achieved their best accuracy with only vegetation indices and at the tasseling phenological stage. Only slight differences in performance were observed between the algorithms considered, highlighting that the main factors influencing performance are the timing of the yield prediction and the predictors with which the machine learning algorithms are fed. Interestingly, PCA was instrumental in increasing the performances of NNET after this stage. An additional benefit of the application of PCA was the overall reduction between 12 and 30.20% in the standard deviation of the maize yield prediction performance from the leave one-year outer-loop cross-validation, depending on the feature set.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/1/100Sentinel-2yield predictionphenologymachine learningmulti-source datadimensionality reduction |
| spellingShingle | Michele Croci Giorgio Impollonia Michele Meroni Stefano Amaducci Dynamic Maize Yield Predictions Using Machine Learning on Multi-Source Data Sentinel-2 yield prediction phenology machine learning multi-source data dimensionality reduction |
| title | Dynamic Maize Yield Predictions Using Machine Learning on Multi-Source Data |
| title_full | Dynamic Maize Yield Predictions Using Machine Learning on Multi-Source Data |
| title_fullStr | Dynamic Maize Yield Predictions Using Machine Learning on Multi-Source Data |
| title_full_unstemmed | Dynamic Maize Yield Predictions Using Machine Learning on Multi-Source Data |
| title_short | Dynamic Maize Yield Predictions Using Machine Learning on Multi-Source Data |
| title_sort | dynamic maize yield predictions using machine learning on multi source data |
| topic | Sentinel-2 yield prediction phenology machine learning multi-source data dimensionality reduction |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/15/1/100 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT michelecroci dynamicmaizeyieldpredictionsusingmachinelearningonmultisourcedata AT giorgioimpollonia dynamicmaizeyieldpredictionsusingmachinelearningonmultisourcedata AT michelemeroni dynamicmaizeyieldpredictionsusingmachinelearningonmultisourcedata AT stefanoamaducci dynamicmaizeyieldpredictionsusingmachinelearningonmultisourcedata |
