Cardiorespiratory Response to Workload Volume and Ergonomic Risk: Automotive Assembly Line Operators’ Adaptations

• Published in: Applied Sciences
• Main Authors: Dania Furk, Luís Silva, Mariana Dias, Carlos Fujão, Phillip Probst, Hui Liu, Hugo Gamboa
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Published: MDPI AG 2024-05-01
• Subjects: ECG; RIP; workload; ergonomic risk; occupational health
• Online Access: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/14/9/3921

Repetitive tasks can lead to long-term cardiovascular problems due to continuous strain and inadequate recovery. The automobile operators on the assembly line are exposed to these risks when workload volume changes according to the workstation type. However, the current ergonomic assessments focus primarily on observational and, in some cases, biomechanical methods that are subjective and time-consuming, overlooking cardiorespiratory adaptations. This study aimed to analyze the cardiorespiratory response to distinct workload volumes and ergonomic risk (ER) scores for an automotive assembly line. Sixteen male operators (age = 38 ± 8 years; BMI = 25 ± 3 kg·m²) volunteered from three workstations (H1, H2, and H3) with specific work cycle duration (1, 3, and 5 min respectively). Electrocardiogram (ECG), respiratory inductance plethysmography (RIP), and accelerometer (ACC) data were collected during their shift. The results showed significant differences from the first to the last 10 min, where H3 had its SDRRi reduced (<i>p</i> = 0.014), H1’s phase synchrony and H2’s coordination between thoracic and abdominal movements decreased (<i>p</i> < 0.001, <i>p</i> = 0.039). In terms of ergonomic risk, the moderate-high rank showed a reduction in SDRRi (<i>p</i> = 0.037) and moderate-risk activities had diminished phase synchrony (<i>p</i> = 0.018) and correlation (<i>p</i> = 0.004). Thus, the explored parameters could have the potential to develop personalized workplace adaptation and risk assessment systems.