Age‐Specific Associations of Usual Blood Pressure Variability With Cardiovascular Disease and Mortality: 10‐Year Diabetes Mellitus Cohort Study

• الحاوية / القاعدة: Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
• المؤلفون الرئيسيون: Eric Yuk Fai Wan, Esther Yee Tak Yu, Weng Yee Chin, Jessica K. Barrett, Ian Chi Kei Wong, Esther Wai Yin Chan, Celine Sze Ling Chui, Shiqi Chen, Cindy Lo Kuen Lam
• التنسيق: مقال
• اللغة: الإنجليزية
• منشور في: Wiley 2021-09-01
• الموضوعات: blood pressure; cardiovascular disease; diabetes mellitus; mortality; visit‐to‐visit variability
• الوصول للمادة أونلاين: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/JAHA.120.019026

Background The detrimental effects of increased variability in systolic blood pressure (SBP) on cardiovascular disease (CVD) and mortality risk in patients with diabetes mellitus remains unclear. This study evaluated age‐specific association of usual SBP visit‐to‐visit variability with CVD and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Methods and Results A retrospective cohort study investigated 155 982 patients with diabetes mellitus aged 45 to 84 years without CVD at baseline (2008–2010). Usual SBP variability was estimated using SBP SD obtained from a mixed‐effects model. Age‐specific associations (45–54, 55–64, 65–74, 75–84 years) between usual SBP variability, CVD, and mortality risk were assessed by Cox regression adjusted for patient characteristics. After a median follow‐up of 9.7 years, 49 816 events (including 34 039 CVD events and 29 211 mortalities) were identified. Elevated SBP variability was independently, positively, and log‐linearly associated with higher CVD and mortality risk among all age groups, with no evidence of any threshold effects. The excess CVD and mortality risk per 5 mm Hg increase in SBP variability within the 45 to 54 age group is >3 times higher than the 70 to 79 age group (hazard ratio, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.49–1.85 versus hazard ratio, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.15–1.23). The significant associations remained consistent among all subgroups. Patients with younger age had a higher association of SBP variability with event outcomes. Conclusions The findings suggest that SBP visit‐to‐visit variability was strongly associated with CVD and mortality with no evidence of a threshold effect in a population with diabetes mellitus. As well as controlling overall blood pressure levels, SBP visit‐to‐visit variability should be monitored and evaluated in routine practice, in particular for younger patients.