Field Information Modeling (FIM)™: Best Practices Using Point Clouds

This study presented established methods, along with new algorithmic developments, to automate point cloud processing in support of the Field Information Modeling (FIM)™ framework. More specifically, given a multi-dimensional (n-D) designed information model, and the point cloud’s spatial uncertaint...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Remote Sensing
Main Author: Reza Maalek
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-03-01
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/5/967
_version_ 1851855364209770496
author Reza Maalek
author_facet Reza Maalek
author_sort Reza Maalek
collection DOAJ
container_title Remote Sensing
description This study presented established methods, along with new algorithmic developments, to automate point cloud processing in support of the Field Information Modeling (FIM)™ framework. More specifically, given a multi-dimensional (n-D) designed information model, and the point cloud’s spatial uncertainty, the problem of automatic assignment of point clouds to their corresponding model elements was considered. The methods addressed two classes of field conditions, namely (i) negligible construction errors and (ii) the existence of construction errors. Emphasis was given to defining the assumptions, potentials, and limitations of each method in practical settings. Considering the shortcomings of current frameworks, three generic algorithms were designed to address the point-cloud-to-model assignment. The algorithms include new developments for (i) point cloud vs. model comparison (negligible construction errors), (ii) robust point neighborhood definition, and (iii) Monte-Carlo-based point-cloud-to-model surface hypothesis testing (existence of construction errors). The effectiveness of the new methods was demonstrated in real-world point clouds, acquired from construction projects, with promising results. For the overall problem of point-cloud-to-model assignment, the proposed point cloud vs. model and point-cloud-to-model hypothesis testing methods achieved F-measures of 99.3% and 98.4%, respectively, on real-world datasets.
format Article
id doaj-art-e62e2fa7eabb4839aab491e617eb0c9c
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2072-4292
language English
publishDate 2021-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-e62e2fa7eabb4839aab491e617eb0c9c2025-08-19T22:22:53ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922021-03-0113596710.3390/rs13050967Field Information Modeling (FIM)™: Best Practices Using Point CloudsReza Maalek0Digital Engineering and Construction, Institute of Technology and Management in Construction, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, 76131 Karlsruhe, GermanyThis study presented established methods, along with new algorithmic developments, to automate point cloud processing in support of the Field Information Modeling (FIM)™ framework. More specifically, given a multi-dimensional (n-D) designed information model, and the point cloud’s spatial uncertainty, the problem of automatic assignment of point clouds to their corresponding model elements was considered. The methods addressed two classes of field conditions, namely (i) negligible construction errors and (ii) the existence of construction errors. Emphasis was given to defining the assumptions, potentials, and limitations of each method in practical settings. Considering the shortcomings of current frameworks, three generic algorithms were designed to address the point-cloud-to-model assignment. The algorithms include new developments for (i) point cloud vs. model comparison (negligible construction errors), (ii) robust point neighborhood definition, and (iii) Monte-Carlo-based point-cloud-to-model surface hypothesis testing (existence of construction errors). The effectiveness of the new methods was demonstrated in real-world point clouds, acquired from construction projects, with promising results. For the overall problem of point-cloud-to-model assignment, the proposed point cloud vs. model and point-cloud-to-model hypothesis testing methods achieved F-measures of 99.3% and 98.4%, respectively, on real-world datasets.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/5/967Field Information Modeling (FIM)point cloud to BIMpoint cloud vs. BIMscan vs. BIMn-D information modelingdigital engineering and construction
spellingShingle Reza Maalek
Field Information Modeling (FIM)™: Best Practices Using Point Clouds
Field Information Modeling (FIM)
point cloud to BIM
point cloud vs. BIM
scan vs. BIM
n-D information modeling
digital engineering and construction
title Field Information Modeling (FIM)™: Best Practices Using Point Clouds
title_full Field Information Modeling (FIM)™: Best Practices Using Point Clouds
title_fullStr Field Information Modeling (FIM)™: Best Practices Using Point Clouds
title_full_unstemmed Field Information Modeling (FIM)™: Best Practices Using Point Clouds
title_short Field Information Modeling (FIM)™: Best Practices Using Point Clouds
title_sort field information modeling fim ™ best practices using point clouds
topic Field Information Modeling (FIM)
point cloud to BIM
point cloud vs. BIM
scan vs. BIM
n-D information modeling
digital engineering and construction
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/13/5/967
work_keys_str_mv AT rezamaalek fieldinformationmodelingfimbestpracticesusingpointclouds