Comparative Efficacy of Transbronchial Needle Aspiration and Cryobiopsies in Thoracic Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis for Optimal Diagnostic Efficacy

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the comparative diagnostic efficacy and safety of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and transbronchial mediastinal cryobiopsy (EBUS-TBMC) for sampling mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes. Following the PRISMA...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Life
Main Authors: Liviu-Ștefan Moacă, Damiana-Maria Vulturar, Daniel-Corneliu Leucuța, Doina Adina Todea, Teodora-Gabriela Alexescu, Maria Adriana Neag, Cezar Aurelian Matau, Anca Dana Buzoianu, Claudia Diana Gherman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2026-05-01
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-1729/16/5/768
Description
Summary:This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the comparative diagnostic efficacy and safety of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) and transbronchial mediastinal cryobiopsy (EBUS-TBMC) for sampling mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes. Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, 20 studies published between January 2020 and July 2025 were analysed to provide a comprehensive performance overview. The results demonstrate that EBUS-TBMC offers a significantly higher overall diagnostic efficacy compared to EBUS-TBNA, with a pooled risk difference (RD) of 0.30 (95% CI: 0.17–0.44, <i>p</i> < 0.001). The subgroup analyses revealed a trend toward a superior yield for EBUS-TBMC in lymphoma (RD 0.11, <i>p</i> = 0.05) and sarcoidosis (RD 0.03, <i>p</i> = 0.077), while no significant differences were found for lung cancer subtypes. Safety profiles remained comparable, with no significant differences in the risk of pneumothorax (RD 0.00, <i>p</i> = 1.00) or bleeding (RD 0.00, <i>p</i> = 0.965). In conclusion, these findings support integrating EBUS-TBMC into diagnostic algorithms when preserved tissue architecture is critical, such as for lymphoproliferative disorders, granulomatous diseases, and advanced molecular profiling, providing a safe and more effective alternative to conventional needle aspiration.
ISSN:2075-1729