Kisceral Argumentation in Law

Gilbert's kisceral argumentation is, roughly speaking, about arguing based on intuitions. In the forefront of such a (rhetorical) model are arguers and audiences, who resolve disagreements using kisceral arguments. Intuitions as reasons were more important in pre-modern law, when the law was n...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Informal Logic
Main Author:	Marko Novak
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	University of Windsor 2022-09-01
Subjects:	kisceral argumentation intuition pre-modern law hardest cases values
Online Access:	https://informallogic.ca/index.php/informal_logic/article/view/7503

Similar Items

On the Kisceral Mode of Argumentation
by: Christopher Tindale
Published: (2022-09-01)

Gilbert as Disrupter
by: Leo Groarke
Published: (2022-09-01)

An exploratory test of an intuitive evaluation method of perceived argument strength
by: Jos Hornikx, et al.
Published: (2022-09-01)

The Case That Alternative Argumentation Drives the Growth of Knowledge-Some Preliminary Evidence
by: Connie Missimer
Published: (1995-01-01)

Cognitive miserliness in argument literacy? Effects of intuitive and analytic thinking on recognizing fallacies
by: Annika M. Svedholm-Häkkinen, et al.
Published: (2022-03-01)

Cognitive miserliness in argument literacy? Effects of intuitive and analytic thinking on recognizing fallacies
by: Annika M. Svedholm-Häkkinen, et al.
Published: (2022-03-01)

the Open-Question Argument, the paradox of analysis, good, intuition, Kripke, Moore.
by: Hussein Waleh, et al.
Published: (2019-08-01)

Levels and predictors of PTSS in young children aged 3–12 years at the hardest-hit area of China during early COVID-19 outbreak
by: Xiaomei Ren, et al.
Published: (2025-07-01)

Legality as legal principle and as legal argument
by: Žaklina Harašić
Published: (2010-01-01)

Analogical Arguments in Ethics and Law: A Defence of Deductivism
by: Fábio Perin Shecaira
Published: (2013-09-01)

Bad Arguments and Objectively Bad Arguments
by: Michael Hoffmann, et al.
Published: (2023-03-01)

Meta-Arguments, Para-Arguments, and Intentionally Bad Arguments
by: Scott Aikin, et al.
Published: (2025-06-01)

Reviewing Argument Schemes for Legal Arguments of Statutory Interpretation
by: Eduardo Brandão Nunes
Published: (2022-10-01)

The rule of law and legal argumentation: notes for their conceptual analysis
by: María Isabel Ruiza Vaca
Published: (2019-12-01)

Epistemic Determination of Mulla Sadra's Philosophy and Criticism of two points of view
by: Abdulah Salavati
Published: (2015-06-01)

Towards a Model of Argument Strength for Bipolar Argumentation Graphs
by: Rast Erich
Published: (2018-09-01)

To what theories of laws of nature B. Faul’s argument is applicable?
by: T. S. Demin
Published: (2020-12-01)

Argument. Appreciation! Argument-Criticism: The "Aesthetics" of Informal Logic
by: Joel Rudinow
Published: (1991-01-01)

International Law and Argumentation: Navigating Constraints and Seeking New Orientations
by: Ronnie Haidar
Published: (2025-09-01)

Hybrid Arguments
by: Mark Vorobej
Published: (1995-01-01)

The Intuitive Law of Léon Petrazycki: Transition from Reason and Nature of Objects to Empirical Intuition as Validity of Law
by: Mahdi Shahabi
Published: (2022-11-01)

Mavrodes on the Nature of Arguments and the Epistemology of Moral Arguments for the Existence of God
by: Mohammad Saeed Akbari Dehghan, et al.
Published: (2018-04-01)

About Intuition in Analytic Theories of Law
by: Maciej Dybowski
Published: (2018-04-01)

Students’ Learning Motivation through the Quality of Scientific Argumentation Skills and Students’ Cognitive Learning Outcomes on Newton's Laws: A Relationship Analysis
by: Almira Betari, et al.
Published: (2021-04-01)

Sequencing Critical Moves for Ethical Argumentation Practice: Munāẓara and the Interdependence of Procedure and Agent
by: Rahmi Oruç, et al.
Published: (2023-03-01)

PARTICIPANTS OF JURIDICAL ARGUMENTATION
by: K. V. Kargin
Published: (2013-06-01)

Arguing with Arguments
by: Harvey Siegel
Published: (2024-01-01)

Value of Evidence of Arguments Via Whatsapp in Divorce Cases in Court
by: Hasbuddin Khalid, et al.
Published: (2023-08-01)

Usage pédagogique des analogies dans l’enseignement supérieur
by: Stéphanie Naud, et al.
Published: (2023-07-01)

Activating argumentation schema to write argumentatively and tactfully
by: Donghong Liu, et al.
Published: (2024-06-01)

Logic, Art and Argument
by: Leo Groarke
Published: (1996-01-01)

An Epistemological Approach to Argumentation
by: Alvin I. Goldman
Published: (2004-01-01)

Analysis and Evaluation of Toulmin’s Model of Practical Argumentation
by: Cosmin-Constantin BĂIAȘ
Published: (2025-01-01)

An argumentation semantics for rational human evaluation of arguments
by: Marcos Cramer, et al.
Published: (2023-03-01)

Argument Pedagogy for Everyday Life
by: Jeffrey P. Mehltretter Drury, et al.
Published: (2019-04-01)

Argumentative trees. What it takes, what it leaves
by: Marianne Doury, et al.
Published: (2025-04-01)

Dialectics of Archaic and Modern in the Axiology of Modern Law
by: F. P. Furman
Published: (2024-07-01)

Argument-based human–AI collaboration for supporting behavior change to improve health
by: Kaan Kilic, et al.
Published: (2023-02-01)

Explaining the Argumentative-Persuasive Function of the Rhetorical Technique of ‘Adaptation’ based on the Argumentative Technique ‘Argument from Authority’
by: Hassan Rahmani, et al.
Published: (2022-06-01)

Argument-Driven Inquiry, Gender, and Its Effects on Argumentation Skills
by: Neni Hasnunidah, et al.
Published: (2019-12-01)