Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase in Medium Vessel Occlusion Ischemic Stroke: A Secondary Analysis of the Alteplase Compared to Tenecteplase Randomized Trial
Background and Purpose The safety and efficacy of tenecteplase in patients with ischemic stroke due to medium vessel occlusion (MeVO) are not well studied. We aimed to compare tenecteplase with alteplase in stroke due to MeVO. Methods Patients with baseline M2-middle cerebral artery (MCA), M3/M4-MCA...
| 出版年: | Journal of Stroke |
|---|---|
| 主要な著者: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
| フォーマット: | 論文 |
| 言語: | 英語 |
| 出版事項: |
Korean Stroke Society
2024-05-01
|
| 主題: | |
| オンライン・アクセス: | http://www.j-stroke.org/upload/pdf/jos-2023-03713.pdf |
| _version_ | 1850271180850724864 |
|---|---|
| author | Fouzi Bala Nishita Singh Katrina Ignacio Ibrahim Alhabli Ayoola Ademola Anas Alrohimi Houman Khosravani Aleksander Tkach Luciana Catanese Dariush Dowlatshahi Thalia Field Gary Hunter Faysal Benali MacKenzie Horn Andrew Demchuk Michael Hill Tolulope Sajobi Brian Buck Richard Swartz Mohammed Almekhlafi Bijoy K. Menon |
| author_facet | Fouzi Bala Nishita Singh Katrina Ignacio Ibrahim Alhabli Ayoola Ademola Anas Alrohimi Houman Khosravani Aleksander Tkach Luciana Catanese Dariush Dowlatshahi Thalia Field Gary Hunter Faysal Benali MacKenzie Horn Andrew Demchuk Michael Hill Tolulope Sajobi Brian Buck Richard Swartz Mohammed Almekhlafi Bijoy K. Menon |
| author_sort | Fouzi Bala |
| collection | DOAJ |
| container_title | Journal of Stroke |
| description | Background and Purpose The safety and efficacy of tenecteplase in patients with ischemic stroke due to medium vessel occlusion (MeVO) are not well studied. We aimed to compare tenecteplase with alteplase in stroke due to MeVO. Methods Patients with baseline M2-middle cerebral artery (MCA), M3/M4-MCA, P2/P3/P4-posterior cerebral artery (PCA), A2/A3/A4-anterior cerebral artery (ACA) occlusions from the Alteplase Compared to Tenecteplase (AcT) trial were included. Primary outcome was the proportion of 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0–1. Secondary outcomes were 90-day mRS 0–2, ordinal mRS, mortality, quality of life measures (EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level, EuroQol visual analog scale), and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH). Initial and final successful reperfusion were reported in patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). Results Among 1,558 patients with available baseline computed tomography angiography; 455 (29.2%) had MeVO of which 27.5% (125/455) were proximal M2; 16.3% (74/455) were distal M2; 35.2% (160/455) were M3/M4; 7.5% (34/455) were A2/A3/A4; and 13.6% (62/455) were P2/P3/P4 occlusions. EVT was performed in 87/455 (19.1%) patients. mRS 0–1 at 90 days was achieved in 37.9% in the tenecteplase versus 34.7% in the alteplase group (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91–1.25). Rates of 90-day mRS 0–2, sICH, and mortality were similar in both groups. No statistical difference was noted in initial successful reperfusion rates (13.0% vs. 7.5%) among the 87 patients who underwent endovascular thrombectomy. However, final successful reperfusion was higher in the tenecteplase group (71.7% vs. 60.0%, aRR 1.29, 95% CI 1.04–1.61). Conclusion Intravenous tenecteplase had comparable safety, functional outcomes and quality of life compared to intravenous alteplase among patients with MeVO. Among those treated with EVT, tenecteplase was associated with higher successful reperfusion rates than alteplase. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e668bfe16b034a51bea2709ffe84cc33 |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| issn | 2287-6391 2287-6405 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-05-01 |
| publisher | Korean Stroke Society |
| record_format | Article |
| spelling | doaj-art-e668bfe16b034a51bea2709ffe84cc332025-08-19T23:42:44ZengKorean Stroke SocietyJournal of Stroke2287-63912287-64052024-05-0126228028910.5853/jos.2023.03713532Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase in Medium Vessel Occlusion Ischemic Stroke: A Secondary Analysis of the Alteplase Compared to Tenecteplase Randomized TrialFouzi Bala0Nishita Singh1Katrina Ignacio2Ibrahim Alhabli3Ayoola Ademola4Anas Alrohimi5Houman Khosravani6Aleksander Tkach7Luciana Catanese8Dariush Dowlatshahi9Thalia Field10Gary Hunter11Faysal Benali12MacKenzie Horn13Andrew Demchuk14Michael Hill15Tolulope Sajobi16Brian Buck17Richard Swartz18Mohammed Almekhlafi19Bijoy K. Menon20 Diagnostic and Interventional Neuroradiology Department, University Hospital of Tours, Tours, France Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre and the University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada Kelowna General Hospital, Kelowna, Canada Hamilton Health Sciences Centre and McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, and the Ottawa Heart Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada Vancouver Stroke Program and the Division of Neurology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Canada Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre+ (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada Department of Medicine (Neurology), King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, CanadaBackground and Purpose The safety and efficacy of tenecteplase in patients with ischemic stroke due to medium vessel occlusion (MeVO) are not well studied. We aimed to compare tenecteplase with alteplase in stroke due to MeVO. Methods Patients with baseline M2-middle cerebral artery (MCA), M3/M4-MCA, P2/P3/P4-posterior cerebral artery (PCA), A2/A3/A4-anterior cerebral artery (ACA) occlusions from the Alteplase Compared to Tenecteplase (AcT) trial were included. Primary outcome was the proportion of 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0–1. Secondary outcomes were 90-day mRS 0–2, ordinal mRS, mortality, quality of life measures (EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level, EuroQol visual analog scale), and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH). Initial and final successful reperfusion were reported in patients undergoing endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). Results Among 1,558 patients with available baseline computed tomography angiography; 455 (29.2%) had MeVO of which 27.5% (125/455) were proximal M2; 16.3% (74/455) were distal M2; 35.2% (160/455) were M3/M4; 7.5% (34/455) were A2/A3/A4; and 13.6% (62/455) were P2/P3/P4 occlusions. EVT was performed in 87/455 (19.1%) patients. mRS 0–1 at 90 days was achieved in 37.9% in the tenecteplase versus 34.7% in the alteplase group (adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91–1.25). Rates of 90-day mRS 0–2, sICH, and mortality were similar in both groups. No statistical difference was noted in initial successful reperfusion rates (13.0% vs. 7.5%) among the 87 patients who underwent endovascular thrombectomy. However, final successful reperfusion was higher in the tenecteplase group (71.7% vs. 60.0%, aRR 1.29, 95% CI 1.04–1.61). Conclusion Intravenous tenecteplase had comparable safety, functional outcomes and quality of life compared to intravenous alteplase among patients with MeVO. Among those treated with EVT, tenecteplase was associated with higher successful reperfusion rates than alteplase.http://www.j-stroke.org/upload/pdf/jos-2023-03713.pdfstrokeocclusionmechanical thrombectomyalteplasethrombolysisischemic |
| spellingShingle | Fouzi Bala Nishita Singh Katrina Ignacio Ibrahim Alhabli Ayoola Ademola Anas Alrohimi Houman Khosravani Aleksander Tkach Luciana Catanese Dariush Dowlatshahi Thalia Field Gary Hunter Faysal Benali MacKenzie Horn Andrew Demchuk Michael Hill Tolulope Sajobi Brian Buck Richard Swartz Mohammed Almekhlafi Bijoy K. Menon Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase in Medium Vessel Occlusion Ischemic Stroke: A Secondary Analysis of the Alteplase Compared to Tenecteplase Randomized Trial stroke occlusion mechanical thrombectomy alteplase thrombolysis ischemic |
| title | Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase in Medium Vessel Occlusion Ischemic Stroke: A Secondary Analysis of the Alteplase Compared to Tenecteplase Randomized Trial |
| title_full | Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase in Medium Vessel Occlusion Ischemic Stroke: A Secondary Analysis of the Alteplase Compared to Tenecteplase Randomized Trial |
| title_fullStr | Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase in Medium Vessel Occlusion Ischemic Stroke: A Secondary Analysis of the Alteplase Compared to Tenecteplase Randomized Trial |
| title_full_unstemmed | Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase in Medium Vessel Occlusion Ischemic Stroke: A Secondary Analysis of the Alteplase Compared to Tenecteplase Randomized Trial |
| title_short | Tenecteplase Versus Alteplase in Medium Vessel Occlusion Ischemic Stroke: A Secondary Analysis of the Alteplase Compared to Tenecteplase Randomized Trial |
| title_sort | tenecteplase versus alteplase in medium vessel occlusion ischemic stroke a secondary analysis of the alteplase compared to tenecteplase randomized trial |
| topic | stroke occlusion mechanical thrombectomy alteplase thrombolysis ischemic |
| url | http://www.j-stroke.org/upload/pdf/jos-2023-03713.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT fouzibala tenecteplaseversusalteplaseinmediumvesselocclusionischemicstrokeasecondaryanalysisofthealteplasecomparedtotenecteplaserandomizedtrial AT nishitasingh tenecteplaseversusalteplaseinmediumvesselocclusionischemicstrokeasecondaryanalysisofthealteplasecomparedtotenecteplaserandomizedtrial AT katrinaignacio tenecteplaseversusalteplaseinmediumvesselocclusionischemicstrokeasecondaryanalysisofthealteplasecomparedtotenecteplaserandomizedtrial AT ibrahimalhabli tenecteplaseversusalteplaseinmediumvesselocclusionischemicstrokeasecondaryanalysisofthealteplasecomparedtotenecteplaserandomizedtrial AT ayoolaademola tenecteplaseversusalteplaseinmediumvesselocclusionischemicstrokeasecondaryanalysisofthealteplasecomparedtotenecteplaserandomizedtrial AT anasalrohimi tenecteplaseversusalteplaseinmediumvesselocclusionischemicstrokeasecondaryanalysisofthealteplasecomparedtotenecteplaserandomizedtrial AT houmankhosravani tenecteplaseversusalteplaseinmediumvesselocclusionischemicstrokeasecondaryanalysisofthealteplasecomparedtotenecteplaserandomizedtrial AT aleksandertkach tenecteplaseversusalteplaseinmediumvesselocclusionischemicstrokeasecondaryanalysisofthealteplasecomparedtotenecteplaserandomizedtrial AT lucianacatanese tenecteplaseversusalteplaseinmediumvesselocclusionischemicstrokeasecondaryanalysisofthealteplasecomparedtotenecteplaserandomizedtrial AT dariushdowlatshahi tenecteplaseversusalteplaseinmediumvesselocclusionischemicstrokeasecondaryanalysisofthealteplasecomparedtotenecteplaserandomizedtrial AT thaliafield tenecteplaseversusalteplaseinmediumvesselocclusionischemicstrokeasecondaryanalysisofthealteplasecomparedtotenecteplaserandomizedtrial AT garyhunter tenecteplaseversusalteplaseinmediumvesselocclusionischemicstrokeasecondaryanalysisofthealteplasecomparedtotenecteplaserandomizedtrial AT faysalbenali tenecteplaseversusalteplaseinmediumvesselocclusionischemicstrokeasecondaryanalysisofthealteplasecomparedtotenecteplaserandomizedtrial AT mackenziehorn tenecteplaseversusalteplaseinmediumvesselocclusionischemicstrokeasecondaryanalysisofthealteplasecomparedtotenecteplaserandomizedtrial AT andrewdemchuk tenecteplaseversusalteplaseinmediumvesselocclusionischemicstrokeasecondaryanalysisofthealteplasecomparedtotenecteplaserandomizedtrial AT michaelhill tenecteplaseversusalteplaseinmediumvesselocclusionischemicstrokeasecondaryanalysisofthealteplasecomparedtotenecteplaserandomizedtrial AT tolulopesajobi tenecteplaseversusalteplaseinmediumvesselocclusionischemicstrokeasecondaryanalysisofthealteplasecomparedtotenecteplaserandomizedtrial AT brianbuck tenecteplaseversusalteplaseinmediumvesselocclusionischemicstrokeasecondaryanalysisofthealteplasecomparedtotenecteplaserandomizedtrial AT richardswartz tenecteplaseversusalteplaseinmediumvesselocclusionischemicstrokeasecondaryanalysisofthealteplasecomparedtotenecteplaserandomizedtrial AT mohammedalmekhlafi tenecteplaseversusalteplaseinmediumvesselocclusionischemicstrokeasecondaryanalysisofthealteplasecomparedtotenecteplaserandomizedtrial AT bijoykmenon tenecteplaseversusalteplaseinmediumvesselocclusionischemicstrokeasecondaryanalysisofthealteplasecomparedtotenecteplaserandomizedtrial |
