Elephant Scar Prevalence in the Kasigau Wildlife Corridor, Kenya: Echoes of Human-Elephant Conflict

Human–elephant conflict (HEC) compromises crop security and threatens elephant conservation. Most commonly, HEC manifests as crop-foraging as elephants modify natural foraging strategies to incorporate crops. Farmers may retaliate by frightening or harming elephants, leaving scars from inflicted wou...

وصف كامل

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
الحاوية / القاعدة:Animals
المؤلفون الرئيسيون: Lynn Von Hagen, Chase A. LaDue, Bruce A. Schulte
التنسيق: مقال
اللغة:الإنجليزية
منشور في: MDPI AG 2023-02-01
الموضوعات:
الوصول للمادة أونلاين:https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/13/4/605
_version_ 1850096482188787712
author Lynn Von Hagen
Chase A. LaDue
Bruce A. Schulte
author_facet Lynn Von Hagen
Chase A. LaDue
Bruce A. Schulte
author_sort Lynn Von Hagen
collection DOAJ
container_title Animals
description Human–elephant conflict (HEC) compromises crop security and threatens elephant conservation. Most commonly, HEC manifests as crop-foraging as elephants modify natural foraging strategies to incorporate crops. Farmers may retaliate by frightening or harming elephants, leaving scars from inflicted wounds. We assessed the prevalence and distribution of scars on the bodies of African savanna elephants (<i>Loxodonta africana</i>) observed in the Kasigau Wildlife Corridor (KWC), part of the Greater Tsavo Ecosystem of Kenya, where conflict is prevalent. We surmised that scars on the body are largely a result of HEC as opposed to scars on the rump or head, which we attributed primarily to elephant–elephant conflict. We hypothesized that: (1) male elephants would have more scars than females; (2) older males would be more likely to have scars than younger males; and (3) most scars would be located on the bodies of elephants. We assessed scars from a photographic catalogue of elephants from the KWC. In line with our hypotheses, male elephants were more likely to have scars than females (32% of males compared to 6% of females); older males had significantly more scars than younger males (61% compared to 24%); and the majority of scars (89%) were located on the body. Scar presence may be useful as an animal-centered indicator to estimate the prevalence and demographic patterns of HEC.
format Article
id doaj-art-e68eec12ed6d4d3eb670d37574f2fc94
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2076-2615
language English
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-e68eec12ed6d4d3eb670d37574f2fc942025-08-20T00:06:40ZengMDPI AGAnimals2076-26152023-02-0113460510.3390/ani13040605Elephant Scar Prevalence in the Kasigau Wildlife Corridor, Kenya: Echoes of Human-Elephant ConflictLynn Von Hagen0Chase A. LaDue1Bruce A. Schulte2College of Forestry, Wildlife, and Environment, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849, USADepartment of Conservation and Science, Oklahoma City Zoo and Botanical Garden, Oklahoma City, OK 73111, USADepartment of Biology, Western Kentucky University, Bowling Green, KY 42101, USAHuman–elephant conflict (HEC) compromises crop security and threatens elephant conservation. Most commonly, HEC manifests as crop-foraging as elephants modify natural foraging strategies to incorporate crops. Farmers may retaliate by frightening or harming elephants, leaving scars from inflicted wounds. We assessed the prevalence and distribution of scars on the bodies of African savanna elephants (<i>Loxodonta africana</i>) observed in the Kasigau Wildlife Corridor (KWC), part of the Greater Tsavo Ecosystem of Kenya, where conflict is prevalent. We surmised that scars on the body are largely a result of HEC as opposed to scars on the rump or head, which we attributed primarily to elephant–elephant conflict. We hypothesized that: (1) male elephants would have more scars than females; (2) older males would be more likely to have scars than younger males; and (3) most scars would be located on the bodies of elephants. We assessed scars from a photographic catalogue of elephants from the KWC. In line with our hypotheses, male elephants were more likely to have scars than females (32% of males compared to 6% of females); older males had significantly more scars than younger males (61% compared to 24%); and the majority of scars (89%) were located on the body. Scar presence may be useful as an animal-centered indicator to estimate the prevalence and demographic patterns of HEC.https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/13/4/605African savanna elephantconservationcrop-foraginghuman–wildlife conflicthuman–wildlife interactions<i>Loxodonta africana</i>
spellingShingle Lynn Von Hagen
Chase A. LaDue
Bruce A. Schulte
Elephant Scar Prevalence in the Kasigau Wildlife Corridor, Kenya: Echoes of Human-Elephant Conflict
African savanna elephant
conservation
crop-foraging
human–wildlife conflict
human–wildlife interactions
<i>Loxodonta africana</i>
title Elephant Scar Prevalence in the Kasigau Wildlife Corridor, Kenya: Echoes of Human-Elephant Conflict
title_full Elephant Scar Prevalence in the Kasigau Wildlife Corridor, Kenya: Echoes of Human-Elephant Conflict
title_fullStr Elephant Scar Prevalence in the Kasigau Wildlife Corridor, Kenya: Echoes of Human-Elephant Conflict
title_full_unstemmed Elephant Scar Prevalence in the Kasigau Wildlife Corridor, Kenya: Echoes of Human-Elephant Conflict
title_short Elephant Scar Prevalence in the Kasigau Wildlife Corridor, Kenya: Echoes of Human-Elephant Conflict
title_sort elephant scar prevalence in the kasigau wildlife corridor kenya echoes of human elephant conflict
topic African savanna elephant
conservation
crop-foraging
human–wildlife conflict
human–wildlife interactions
<i>Loxodonta africana</i>
url https://www.mdpi.com/2076-2615/13/4/605
work_keys_str_mv AT lynnvonhagen elephantscarprevalenceinthekasigauwildlifecorridorkenyaechoesofhumanelephantconflict
AT chasealadue elephantscarprevalenceinthekasigauwildlifecorridorkenyaechoesofhumanelephantconflict
AT bruceaschulte elephantscarprevalenceinthekasigauwildlifecorridorkenyaechoesofhumanelephantconflict