Immunohistochemistry for Prostate Biopsy—Impact on Histological Prostate Cancer Diagnoses and Clinical Decision Making

Background: To test the value of immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining in prostate biopsies for changes in biopsy results and its impact on treatment decision-making. Methods: Between January 2017–June 2020, all patients undergoing prostate biopsies were identified and evaluated regarding additional I...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:	Current Oncology
Main Authors:	Philipp Mandel, Mike Wenzel, Benedikt Hoeh, Maria N. Welte, Felix Preisser, Tahir Inam, Clarissa Wittler, Clara Humke, Jens Köllermann, Peter Wild, Christoph Würnschimmel, Derya Tilki, Markus Graefen, Luis A. Kluth, Pierre I. Karakiewicz, Felix K.-H. Chun, Andreas Becker
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	MDPI AG 2021-06-01
Subjects:	immunohistochemistry IHC prostate cancer radical prostatectomy ASAP Gleason Score
Online Access:	https://www.mdpi.com/1718-7729/28/3/197

Similar Items

Influence of Biopsy Gleason Score on the Risk of Lymph Node Invasion in Patients With Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy
by: Mike Wenzel, et al.
Published: (2021-12-01)

Influence of Tumor Burden on Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen in Prostate Cancer Patients Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy
by: Philipp Mandel, et al.
Published: (2021-07-01)

Urethral Sphincter Length but Not Prostatic Apex Shape in Preoperative MRI Is Associated with Mid-Term Continence Rates after Radical Prostatectomy
by: Benedikt Hoeh, et al.
Published: (2022-03-01)

Impact of Age on Long-Term Urinary Continence after Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
by: Cristina Cano Garcia, et al.
Published: (2023-06-01)

Correlation of Urine Loss after Catheter Removal and Early Continence in Men Undergoing Radical Prostatectomy
by: Benedikt Hoeh, et al.
Published: (2021-11-01)

Inverse Stage Migration in Radical Prostatectomy—A Sustaining Phenomenon
by: Benedikt Hoeh, et al.
Published: (2021-03-01)

Correlation between Gleason Scores of Prostatic Biopsies and Radical Prostatectomy Specimens
by: Panitta Sitthinamsuwan, et al.
Published: (2009-01-01)

FACTORS PREDICTING A POSSIBLE INCREASE OF GLEASON SCORE AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY IN PATIENTS WITH WELL-DIFFERENTIATED PROSTATE CANCER
by: B. Lazarov
Published: (2022-06-01)

Concordance between Preoperative mpMRI and Pathological Stage and Its Influence on Nerve-Sparing Surgery in Patients with High-Risk Prostate Cancer
by: Clara Humke, et al.
Published: (2022-03-01)

The association between the interval from biopsy to radical prostatectomy and biochemical recurrence in patients with intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer
by: Carolin Siech, et al.
Published: (2025-02-01)

The prevalence and risk factors of upgrading of Gleason grade group between transrectal ultrasound prostate biopsy and prostatectomy specimens
by: Worapong Promsen, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01)

Gleason group concordance between biopsy and radical prostatectomy specimens: A cohort study from Prostate Cancer Outcome Registry – Victoria
by: Sue M. Evans, et al.
Published: (2016-12-01)

Determining the degree of alignment of prostate carcinoma in a rectal biopsy with radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate carcinoma
by: Kamaleddin Hassanzadeh, et al.
Published: (2021-02-01)

Impact of tertiary Gleason pattern 5 on prostate cancer aggressiveness: Lessons from a contemporary single institution radical prostatectomy series
by: Zachary B. Koloff, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01)

PSA AND ITS RELATION TOTHE DEGREE OF DIFFERENTIATION OF PROSTATE CANCER
by: B. Lazarov
Published: (2025-03-01)

Risk of Cancer-related Death for Men with Biopsy Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer and High-risk Features: A European Multi-institutional Study
by: Daimantas Milonas, et al.
Published: (2024-08-01)

Prognostic Implications of Modified Gleason Score and Gleason Grade Group in Histopathologic Study of Prostatic Adenocarcinoma: A Cross-sectional Study
by: Netra Prakash Kori, et al.
Published: (2024-11-01)

CD44 Immunohistochemical Expression in Central and Peripheral Parts of Prostatic Adenocarcinoma: An Institutional Study
by: Romano Oguic, et al.
Published: (2024-12-01)

Correlation of MRI-Lesion Targeted Biopsy vs. Systematic Biopsy Gleason Score with Final Pathological Gleason Score after Radical Prostatectomy
by: Mike Wenzel, et al.
Published: (2021-05-01)

Grading of prostate cancer: Evolution and changing concepts
by: Vijayalaxmi M Dhorigol, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01)

Targeted Prostate Biopsies Overestimate International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Group, Particularly in Smaller Tumors
by: Lisa J. Kroon, et al.
Published: (2025-05-01)

External Tertiary-Care-Hospital Validation of the Epidemiological SEER-Based Nomogram Predicting Downgrading in High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients Treated with Radical Prostatectomy
by: Cristina Cano Garcia, et al.
Published: (2023-05-01)

A high high-density lipoprotein level is associated with Gleason score upgrade in Chinese patients diagnosed with high-grade prostate carcinoma
by: Jingcheng Lyu, et al.
Published: (2023-01-01)

Histopathological Outcomes after Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate Cancer Based On a New Grading System
by: Borislav Spajić, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01)

Clinical Predictors and Risk Factors of Gleason Score Upgrade: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis
by: Carmine Sciorio, et al.
Published: (2025-05-01)

Cardiovascular Disease and Chronic Pulmonary Disease Increase the Risk of Short-Term Major Postoperative Complications after Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy
by: Carolin Siech, et al.
Published: (2024-01-01)

Gleason score and tumor laterality in radical prostatectomy and transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy of the prostate: a comparative study
by: Renan A Pereira, et al.
Published: (2015-01-01)

Contemporary Treatment Patterns and Oncological Outcomes of Metastatic Hormone-sensitive Prostate Cancer and First- to Sixth- line Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Patients
by: Mike Wenzel, et al.
Published: (2024-08-01)

Combined Systematic and MRI-US Fusion Prostate Biopsy Has the Highest Grading Accuracy When Compared to Final Pathology
by: Iulia Andras, et al.
Published: (2021-05-01)

Prostate Health Index (phi) and its derivatives predict Gleason score upgrading after radical prostatectomy among patients with low-risk prostate cancer
by: Jia-Qi Yan, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01)

Evaluation Expression COX-2 in Prostatic Carcinoma by PCR and Immunohistochemistry and Its Relationship with Gleason Score
by: Maryam Ghiasi, et al.
Published: (2021-05-01)

Survival Significance of Patients With Low Prostate-Specific Antigen and High-Grade Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy, External Beam Radiotherapy, or External Beam Radiotherapy With Brachytherapy
by: Yadong Guo, et al.
Published: (2019-07-01)

Very Early Continence After Radical Prostatectomy and Its Influencing Factors
by: Lena Theissen, et al.
Published: (2019-10-01)

Contemporary review of prognostic markers of prostate cancer from a pathologist perspective
by: Martin Elias, et al.
Published: (2025-09-01)

The effect of the discrepancy between pre- and post-operative staging on decision-making and quality of life in men undergoing a radical prostatectomy
by: Álvaro Martínez-Bordajandi, et al.
Published: (2023-07-01)

Low levels of serum testosterone in middle-aged men impact pathological features of prostate cancer
by: Elton Llukani, et al.
Published: (2017-03-01)

Management and treatment options for patients with de novo and recurrent hormone-sensitive oligometastatic prostate cancer
by: Felix Preisser, et al.
Published: (2021-09-01)

Imaging as a Personalized Biomarker for Prostate Cancer Risk Stratification
by: Kyle H. Gennaro, et al.
Published: (2018-11-01)

Role of multi-parametric MRI of the prostate for screening and staging: Experience with over 1500 cases
by: Geoffrey Gaunay, et al.
Published: (2017-01-01)

Transition from Transrectal to Transperineal MRI-Fusion Prostate Biopsy Does Not Comprise Detection Rates of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer at a Tertiary Care Center
by: Benedikt Hoeh, et al.
Published: (2024-06-01)