More than procurement

Although there is a wealth of research on farm-to-school programs (FTS), less has been published about farm to early care and education programs (ECE). This paper examines the results of partici­pating in a farm-to-ECE procurement pilot pro­gram on provider practices across the three core elements...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development
Main Authors: Meagan Shedd, Rachel Kelly
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Lyson Center for Civic Agriculture and Food Systems 2023-10-01
Subjects:
Online Access:https://foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/article/view/1196
_version_ 1851888636015935488
author Meagan Shedd
Rachel Kelly
author_facet Meagan Shedd
Rachel Kelly
author_sort Meagan Shedd
collection DOAJ
container_title Journal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development
description Although there is a wealth of research on farm-to-school programs (FTS), less has been published about farm to early care and education programs (ECE). This paper examines the results of partici­pating in a farm-to-ECE procurement pilot pro­gram on provider practices across the three core elements of farm to ECE: (1) purchasing, (2) gar­dening, and (3) nutrition and education activities. In order to address the geographic and funding constraints of an existing procurement pilot, Michigan offered an expansion of this model so that ECE sites could take part in a learning collab­orative. They did this by examining the effective­ness of evidence-based practices in obtaining locally grown foods from a variety of sources among ECE sites, for statewide replication. Partici­pation included self-assessment of learning envi­ronments using a nationally available, validated instrument to determine pre- to post-test changes in farm-to-ECE practices and what, if any, changes in practices might have occurred for those partici­pating in the procurement pilot, with the goal of sharing what was learned statewide. Key findings include improvements of statistical significance from pre-test to post-test and changes in best prac­tices among participants using Go NAPSACC, with the top three most improved practices involv­ing garden-based practices. The role of self-assess­ment, funding, and limitations are discussed, along with implications for practice and further research.
format Article
id doaj-art-e6d2c1efd05f4c35a9084b8aca72bde9
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2152-0801
language English
publishDate 2023-10-01
publisher Lyson Center for Civic Agriculture and Food Systems
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-e6d2c1efd05f4c35a9084b8aca72bde92025-08-19T22:10:38ZengLyson Center for Civic Agriculture and Food SystemsJournal of Agriculture, Food Systems, and Community Development2152-08012023-10-0113110.5304/jafscd.2023.131.007More than procurementMeagan Shedd0Rachel Kelly1Michigan State UniversityMichigan State University Although there is a wealth of research on farm-to-school programs (FTS), less has been published about farm to early care and education programs (ECE). This paper examines the results of partici­pating in a farm-to-ECE procurement pilot pro­gram on provider practices across the three core elements of farm to ECE: (1) purchasing, (2) gar­dening, and (3) nutrition and education activities. In order to address the geographic and funding constraints of an existing procurement pilot, Michigan offered an expansion of this model so that ECE sites could take part in a learning collab­orative. They did this by examining the effective­ness of evidence-based practices in obtaining locally grown foods from a variety of sources among ECE sites, for statewide replication. Partici­pation included self-assessment of learning envi­ronments using a nationally available, validated instrument to determine pre- to post-test changes in farm-to-ECE practices and what, if any, changes in practices might have occurred for those partici­pating in the procurement pilot, with the goal of sharing what was learned statewide. Key findings include improvements of statistical significance from pre-test to post-test and changes in best prac­tices among participants using Go NAPSACC, with the top three most improved practices involv­ing garden-based practices. The role of self-assess­ment, funding, and limitations are discussed, along with implications for practice and further research. https://foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/article/view/1196farm-to-ECE programsearly care and educationnutritionprocurement
spellingShingle Meagan Shedd
Rachel Kelly
More than procurement
farm-to-ECE programs
early care and education
nutrition
procurement
title More than procurement
title_full More than procurement
title_fullStr More than procurement
title_full_unstemmed More than procurement
title_short More than procurement
title_sort more than procurement
topic farm-to-ECE programs
early care and education
nutrition
procurement
url https://foodsystemsjournal.org/index.php/fsj/article/view/1196
work_keys_str_mv AT meaganshedd morethanprocurement
AT rachelkelly morethanprocurement