Critical pre- and postoperative factors in evaluating ptosis

BackgroundBlepharoptosis repair is a common eyelid surgery worldwide, however technique and outcome measurements vary widely.ObjectiveThis study aims to determine a consensus on pre- and postoperative factors important to oculoplastic surgeons in the evaluation of ptosis.MethodsOculoplastic surgeons...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Frontiers in Ophthalmology
Main Authors: Jordan N. Cornwell, Claire S. Smith, Katherine M. Lucarelli, Alexander Sones, Daniel B. Rootman
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2025-08-01
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fopht.2025.1609113/full
_version_ 1849422943022481408
author Jordan N. Cornwell
Claire S. Smith
Katherine M. Lucarelli
Alexander Sones
Daniel B. Rootman
author_facet Jordan N. Cornwell
Claire S. Smith
Katherine M. Lucarelli
Alexander Sones
Daniel B. Rootman
author_sort Jordan N. Cornwell
collection DOAJ
container_title Frontiers in Ophthalmology
description BackgroundBlepharoptosis repair is a common eyelid surgery worldwide, however technique and outcome measurements vary widely.ObjectiveThis study aims to determine a consensus on pre- and postoperative factors important to oculoplastic surgeons in the evaluation of ptosis.MethodsOculoplastic surgeons were queried to describe 10 or more variables important for pre- and postoperative evaluation of ptosis and subsequently rate them on a 5-point Likert scale. A nominal group meeting determined a consensus on the 10 most important pre- and postoperative factors based on the previous survey responses. Mean and standard deviation for Likert score responses were compared using a student’s t-test.ResultsOne hundred and sixty-three respondents contributed a total of 1,909 open-ended responses. The two most cited factors were levator function (91.4%) and upper marginal reflex distance (87.7%). Known secondary causes of ptosis (75.5%), health of cornea and tear film (58.9%) and brow elevation/compensation (55.2%) were reported as important by over 50% of the respondents. The final variables were categorized into four groups: Causes of Ptosis, Surgical Planning, Anatomy and Symmetry, and Ptosis-Related Quality of Life.ConclusionA cohort of ASOPRS oculoplastic surgeons reached a consensus on a critical set of variables important for ptosis evaluation.
format Article
id doaj-art-e71b7474c8a845a19776eee66d7a7dd0
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2674-0826
language English
publishDate 2025-08-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-e71b7474c8a845a19776eee66d7a7dd02025-08-20T03:43:10ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Ophthalmology2674-08262025-08-01510.3389/fopht.2025.16091131609113Critical pre- and postoperative factors in evaluating ptosisJordan N. CornwellClaire S. SmithKatherine M. LucarelliAlexander SonesDaniel B. RootmanBackgroundBlepharoptosis repair is a common eyelid surgery worldwide, however technique and outcome measurements vary widely.ObjectiveThis study aims to determine a consensus on pre- and postoperative factors important to oculoplastic surgeons in the evaluation of ptosis.MethodsOculoplastic surgeons were queried to describe 10 or more variables important for pre- and postoperative evaluation of ptosis and subsequently rate them on a 5-point Likert scale. A nominal group meeting determined a consensus on the 10 most important pre- and postoperative factors based on the previous survey responses. Mean and standard deviation for Likert score responses were compared using a student’s t-test.ResultsOne hundred and sixty-three respondents contributed a total of 1,909 open-ended responses. The two most cited factors were levator function (91.4%) and upper marginal reflex distance (87.7%). Known secondary causes of ptosis (75.5%), health of cornea and tear film (58.9%) and brow elevation/compensation (55.2%) were reported as important by over 50% of the respondents. The final variables were categorized into four groups: Causes of Ptosis, Surgical Planning, Anatomy and Symmetry, and Ptosis-Related Quality of Life.ConclusionA cohort of ASOPRS oculoplastic surgeons reached a consensus on a critical set of variables important for ptosis evaluation.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fopht.2025.1609113/fullptosis repairpre-operative assessmentptosis-related outcomesdelphi techniquenominal group technique
spellingShingle Jordan N. Cornwell
Claire S. Smith
Katherine M. Lucarelli
Alexander Sones
Daniel B. Rootman
Critical pre- and postoperative factors in evaluating ptosis
ptosis repair
pre-operative assessment
ptosis-related outcomes
delphi technique
nominal group technique
title Critical pre- and postoperative factors in evaluating ptosis
title_full Critical pre- and postoperative factors in evaluating ptosis
title_fullStr Critical pre- and postoperative factors in evaluating ptosis
title_full_unstemmed Critical pre- and postoperative factors in evaluating ptosis
title_short Critical pre- and postoperative factors in evaluating ptosis
title_sort critical pre and postoperative factors in evaluating ptosis
topic ptosis repair
pre-operative assessment
ptosis-related outcomes
delphi technique
nominal group technique
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fopht.2025.1609113/full
work_keys_str_mv AT jordanncornwell criticalpreandpostoperativefactorsinevaluatingptosis
AT clairessmith criticalpreandpostoperativefactorsinevaluatingptosis
AT katherinemlucarelli criticalpreandpostoperativefactorsinevaluatingptosis
AT alexandersones criticalpreandpostoperativefactorsinevaluatingptosis
AT danielbrootman criticalpreandpostoperativefactorsinevaluatingptosis