PRODUCTION OF NANOCELLULOSE FROM NATIVE CELLULOSE – VARIOUS OPTIONS UTILIZING ULTRASOUND

In this study three different ways of applying ultrasound for the production of nanocellulose from native cellulose were explored. In the first option bleached hardwood kraft pulp was oxidized with the ultrasound (US) assisted TEMPO/NaBr/NaOCl-system (US-TEMPO-system) followed by mechanical separati...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:BioResources
Main Authors: Shree Prakash Mishra, Anne-Sophie Manent, Bruno Chabot, Claude Daneault
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: North Carolina State University 2011-11-01
Subjects:
Online Access:http://ojs.cnr.ncsu.edu/index.php/BioRes/article/view/BioRes_07_1_0422_Mishra_MCD_Prodn_Nanocellulose_Various_Options_Ultrasound/1315
_version_ 1852719940977557504
author Shree Prakash Mishra,
Anne-Sophie Manent,
Bruno Chabot,
Claude Daneault
author_facet Shree Prakash Mishra,
Anne-Sophie Manent,
Bruno Chabot,
Claude Daneault
author_sort Shree Prakash Mishra,
collection DOAJ
container_title BioResources
description In this study three different ways of applying ultrasound for the production of nanocellulose from native cellulose were explored. In the first option bleached hardwood kraft pulp was oxidized with the ultrasound (US) assisted TEMPO/NaBr/NaOCl-system (US-TEMPO-system) followed by mechanical separation of nanocellulose. The pulp oxidized by the US-TEMPO-system had higher carboxyls content and ca. 10% increase in nanocellulose yield when compared to the TEMPO-system without sono catalysis. In the second option ultrasound pretreated pulp was oxidized using the TEMPO-system. Although there was no gain in carboxyls content in this process versus the oxidation with TEMPO-system without ultrasound treatment, a higher degree of fibrillation was obtained after ultrasound treatment. In the third case the TEMPO oxidized pulp was subjected to mechanical and ultrasound treatments for nanocellulose production. Under similar treatment time the subsequent ultrasound treatment achieved higher nanocellulose yield than the subsequent mechanical treatment. However, in comparison, the ultrasound treated nanocellulose had lower Rheometer Stresstech viscosity. Furthermore, it was observed that cellulose nanofibrils produced by ultrasound treatment were slightly thinner compared to those produced using the mechanical method.
format Article
id doaj-art-e71f52ecff094e459f0c477de0be46df
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 1930-2126
language English
publishDate 2011-11-01
publisher North Carolina State University
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-e71f52ecff094e459f0c477de0be46df2025-08-19T21:12:57ZengNorth Carolina State UniversityBioResources1930-21262011-11-0171422436PRODUCTION OF NANOCELLULOSE FROM NATIVE CELLULOSE – VARIOUS OPTIONS UTILIZING ULTRASOUNDShree Prakash Mishra,Anne-Sophie Manent,Bruno Chabot,Claude DaneaultIn this study three different ways of applying ultrasound for the production of nanocellulose from native cellulose were explored. In the first option bleached hardwood kraft pulp was oxidized with the ultrasound (US) assisted TEMPO/NaBr/NaOCl-system (US-TEMPO-system) followed by mechanical separation of nanocellulose. The pulp oxidized by the US-TEMPO-system had higher carboxyls content and ca. 10% increase in nanocellulose yield when compared to the TEMPO-system without sono catalysis. In the second option ultrasound pretreated pulp was oxidized using the TEMPO-system. Although there was no gain in carboxyls content in this process versus the oxidation with TEMPO-system without ultrasound treatment, a higher degree of fibrillation was obtained after ultrasound treatment. In the third case the TEMPO oxidized pulp was subjected to mechanical and ultrasound treatments for nanocellulose production. Under similar treatment time the subsequent ultrasound treatment achieved higher nanocellulose yield than the subsequent mechanical treatment. However, in comparison, the ultrasound treated nanocellulose had lower Rheometer Stresstech viscosity. Furthermore, it was observed that cellulose nanofibrils produced by ultrasound treatment were slightly thinner compared to those produced using the mechanical method.http://ojs.cnr.ncsu.edu/index.php/BioRes/article/view/BioRes_07_1_0422_Mishra_MCD_Prodn_Nanocellulose_Various_Options_Ultrasound/1315NanocelluloseUltrasoundTEMPONative celluloseOxidationCarboxyl groups
spellingShingle Shree Prakash Mishra,
Anne-Sophie Manent,
Bruno Chabot,
Claude Daneault
PRODUCTION OF NANOCELLULOSE FROM NATIVE CELLULOSE – VARIOUS OPTIONS UTILIZING ULTRASOUND
Nanocellulose
Ultrasound
TEMPO
Native cellulose
Oxidation
Carboxyl groups
title PRODUCTION OF NANOCELLULOSE FROM NATIVE CELLULOSE – VARIOUS OPTIONS UTILIZING ULTRASOUND
title_full PRODUCTION OF NANOCELLULOSE FROM NATIVE CELLULOSE – VARIOUS OPTIONS UTILIZING ULTRASOUND
title_fullStr PRODUCTION OF NANOCELLULOSE FROM NATIVE CELLULOSE – VARIOUS OPTIONS UTILIZING ULTRASOUND
title_full_unstemmed PRODUCTION OF NANOCELLULOSE FROM NATIVE CELLULOSE – VARIOUS OPTIONS UTILIZING ULTRASOUND
title_short PRODUCTION OF NANOCELLULOSE FROM NATIVE CELLULOSE – VARIOUS OPTIONS UTILIZING ULTRASOUND
title_sort production of nanocellulose from native cellulose various options utilizing ultrasound
topic Nanocellulose
Ultrasound
TEMPO
Native cellulose
Oxidation
Carboxyl groups
url http://ojs.cnr.ncsu.edu/index.php/BioRes/article/view/BioRes_07_1_0422_Mishra_MCD_Prodn_Nanocellulose_Various_Options_Ultrasound/1315
work_keys_str_mv AT shreeprakashmishra productionofnanocellulosefromnativecellulosevariousoptionsutilizingultrasound
AT annesophiemanent productionofnanocellulosefromnativecellulosevariousoptionsutilizingultrasound
AT brunochabot productionofnanocellulosefromnativecellulosevariousoptionsutilizingultrasound
AT claudedaneault productionofnanocellulosefromnativecellulosevariousoptionsutilizingultrasound