Apportionment of Vehicle Fleet Emissions by Linear Regression, Positive Matrix Factorization, and Emission Modeling

Real-world emission factors for different vehicle types and their contributions to roadside air pollution are needed for air-quality management. Tunnel measurements have been used to estimate emission factors for several vehicle types using linear regression or receptor-based source apportionment. H...

詳細記述

書誌詳細
出版年:Atmosphere
主要な著者: Xiaoliang Wang, L.-W. Antony Chen, Minggen Lu, Kin-Fai Ho, Shun-Cheng Lee, Steven Sai Hang Ho, Judith C. Chow, John G. Watson
フォーマット: 論文
言語:英語
出版事項: MDPI AG 2022-07-01
主題:
オンライン・アクセス:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/13/7/1066
_version_ 1851852829074915328
author Xiaoliang Wang
L.-W. Antony Chen
Minggen Lu
Kin-Fai Ho
Shun-Cheng Lee
Steven Sai Hang Ho
Judith C. Chow
John G. Watson
author_facet Xiaoliang Wang
L.-W. Antony Chen
Minggen Lu
Kin-Fai Ho
Shun-Cheng Lee
Steven Sai Hang Ho
Judith C. Chow
John G. Watson
author_sort Xiaoliang Wang
collection DOAJ
container_title Atmosphere
description Real-world emission factors for different vehicle types and their contributions to roadside air pollution are needed for air-quality management. Tunnel measurements have been used to estimate emission factors for several vehicle types using linear regression or receptor-based source apportionment. However, the accuracy and uncertainties of these methods have not been sufficiently discussed. This study applies four methods to derive emission factors for different vehicle types from tunnel measurements in Hong Kong, China: (1) simple linear regressions (SLR); (2) multiple linear regressions (MLR); (3) positive matrix factorization (PMF); and (4) EMission FACtors for Hong Kong (EMFAC-HK). Separable vehicle types include those fueled by liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), gasoline, and diesel. PMF was the most useful, as it simultaneously seeks source profiles and source contributions. Diesel-, gasoline-, and LPG-fueled vehicle emissions accounted for 52%, 10%, and 5% of PM<sub>2.5</sub> mass, respectively, while ammonium sulfate (~20%), ammonium nitrate (6%), and road dust (7%) were also large contributors. MLR exhibited the highest relative uncertainties, typically over twice those determined by SLR. EMFAC-HK has the lowest relative uncertainties due to its assumption of a single average emission factor for each pollutant and each vehicle category under specific conditions. The relative uncertainties of SLR and PMF are comparable.
format Article
id doaj-art-e753a2317469441faa2db00a9f5d3fd4
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2073-4433
language English
publishDate 2022-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-e753a2317469441faa2db00a9f5d3fd42025-08-19T22:23:49ZengMDPI AGAtmosphere2073-44332022-07-01137106610.3390/atmos13071066Apportionment of Vehicle Fleet Emissions by Linear Regression, Positive Matrix Factorization, and Emission ModelingXiaoliang Wang0L.-W. Antony Chen1Minggen Lu2Kin-Fai Ho3Shun-Cheng Lee4Steven Sai Hang Ho5Judith C. Chow6John G. Watson7Division of Atmospheric Sciences, Desert Research Institute, Reno, NV 89512, USADepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health, University of Nevada-Las Vegas, Las Vegas, NV 89154, USASchool of Public Health, University of Nevada-Reno, Reno, NV 89557, USAThe Jockey Club School of Public Health and Primary Care, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, ChinaDepartment of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, ChinaDivision of Atmospheric Sciences, Desert Research Institute, Reno, NV 89512, USADivision of Atmospheric Sciences, Desert Research Institute, Reno, NV 89512, USADivision of Atmospheric Sciences, Desert Research Institute, Reno, NV 89512, USAReal-world emission factors for different vehicle types and their contributions to roadside air pollution are needed for air-quality management. Tunnel measurements have been used to estimate emission factors for several vehicle types using linear regression or receptor-based source apportionment. However, the accuracy and uncertainties of these methods have not been sufficiently discussed. This study applies four methods to derive emission factors for different vehicle types from tunnel measurements in Hong Kong, China: (1) simple linear regressions (SLR); (2) multiple linear regressions (MLR); (3) positive matrix factorization (PMF); and (4) EMission FACtors for Hong Kong (EMFAC-HK). Separable vehicle types include those fueled by liquefied petroleum gas (LPG), gasoline, and diesel. PMF was the most useful, as it simultaneously seeks source profiles and source contributions. Diesel-, gasoline-, and LPG-fueled vehicle emissions accounted for 52%, 10%, and 5% of PM<sub>2.5</sub> mass, respectively, while ammonium sulfate (~20%), ammonium nitrate (6%), and road dust (7%) were also large contributors. MLR exhibited the highest relative uncertainties, typically over twice those determined by SLR. EMFAC-HK has the lowest relative uncertainties due to its assumption of a single average emission factor for each pollutant and each vehicle category under specific conditions. The relative uncertainties of SLR and PMF are comparable.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/13/7/1066tunnelPM<sub>2.5</sub>source apportionmentPMFHERMlinear regression
spellingShingle Xiaoliang Wang
L.-W. Antony Chen
Minggen Lu
Kin-Fai Ho
Shun-Cheng Lee
Steven Sai Hang Ho
Judith C. Chow
John G. Watson
Apportionment of Vehicle Fleet Emissions by Linear Regression, Positive Matrix Factorization, and Emission Modeling
tunnel
PM<sub>2.5</sub>
source apportionment
PMF
HERM
linear regression
title Apportionment of Vehicle Fleet Emissions by Linear Regression, Positive Matrix Factorization, and Emission Modeling
title_full Apportionment of Vehicle Fleet Emissions by Linear Regression, Positive Matrix Factorization, and Emission Modeling
title_fullStr Apportionment of Vehicle Fleet Emissions by Linear Regression, Positive Matrix Factorization, and Emission Modeling
title_full_unstemmed Apportionment of Vehicle Fleet Emissions by Linear Regression, Positive Matrix Factorization, and Emission Modeling
title_short Apportionment of Vehicle Fleet Emissions by Linear Regression, Positive Matrix Factorization, and Emission Modeling
title_sort apportionment of vehicle fleet emissions by linear regression positive matrix factorization and emission modeling
topic tunnel
PM<sub>2.5</sub>
source apportionment
PMF
HERM
linear regression
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4433/13/7/1066
work_keys_str_mv AT xiaoliangwang apportionmentofvehiclefleetemissionsbylinearregressionpositivematrixfactorizationandemissionmodeling
AT lwantonychen apportionmentofvehiclefleetemissionsbylinearregressionpositivematrixfactorizationandemissionmodeling
AT minggenlu apportionmentofvehiclefleetemissionsbylinearregressionpositivematrixfactorizationandemissionmodeling
AT kinfaiho apportionmentofvehiclefleetemissionsbylinearregressionpositivematrixfactorizationandemissionmodeling
AT shunchenglee apportionmentofvehiclefleetemissionsbylinearregressionpositivematrixfactorizationandemissionmodeling
AT stevensaihangho apportionmentofvehiclefleetemissionsbylinearregressionpositivematrixfactorizationandemissionmodeling
AT judithcchow apportionmentofvehiclefleetemissionsbylinearregressionpositivematrixfactorizationandemissionmodeling
AT johngwatson apportionmentofvehiclefleetemissionsbylinearregressionpositivematrixfactorizationandemissionmodeling