Lower pole approach in retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: a new approach for the management of renal vascular pedicle
Abstract Background The objective of this study was to examine the effectiveness and safety of lower pole (LP) approach in retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN). Methods One hundred thirty-two renal cancer patients were scheduled for selective retroperitoneal LRN. The surgery parame...
| 发表在: | World Journal of Surgical Oncology |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
| 格式: | 文件 |
| 语言: | 英语 |
| 出版: |
BMC
2018-02-01
|
| 主题: | |
| 在线阅读: | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12957-018-1324-7 |
| _version_ | 1852776117810757632 |
|---|---|
| author | Bo Yuan Yuantao Wang Jialin Gao Yongrui Zhang Yaowen Fu Wei An |
| author_facet | Bo Yuan Yuantao Wang Jialin Gao Yongrui Zhang Yaowen Fu Wei An |
| author_sort | Bo Yuan |
| collection | DOAJ |
| container_title | World Journal of Surgical Oncology |
| description | Abstract Background The objective of this study was to examine the effectiveness and safety of lower pole (LP) approach in retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN). Methods One hundred thirty-two renal cancer patients were scheduled for selective retroperitoneal LRN. The surgery parameters and outcomes were compared. Out of 132 patients, 78 (59.1%) patients underwent LRN via LP approach, while 54 (40.9%) patients underwent LRN via lateroposterior space (LPS) approach. Results Compared to LPS group, the LP group had a higher body mass index (27.0 ± 1.7 kg/m2 vs. 24.5 ± 1.8 kg/m2, P < 0.0001) and a larger tumor size (6.9 ± 3.5 cm vs. 4.1 ± 3.3 cm, P < 0.0001). The LP approach reduced the volumes of blood loss and transfusion significantly (135.3 ± 17.2 mL vs. 219.6 ± 30.9 mL, P < 0.0001; 55.6 ± 28.3 vs. 141.1 ± 50.4 mL, P < 0.0001) as compared to the LPS approach. The LP approach also decreased the risk of conversion to open procedure (1.3 vs. 7.4%, P < 0.05). Conclusions The LP approach is an effective and safe alternative to the LPS approach for retroperitoneal LRN and might be more suitable for patients with obesity, large tumors, tumors located at the medial part of the kidney, or renal pedicular adhesion. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e7caed2f45f04b79b7d7aa47bde6aae8 |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| issn | 1477-7819 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2018-02-01 |
| publisher | BMC |
| record_format | Article |
| spelling | doaj-art-e7caed2f45f04b79b7d7aa47bde6aae82025-08-19T20:49:57ZengBMCWorld Journal of Surgical Oncology1477-78192018-02-011611710.1186/s12957-018-1324-7Lower pole approach in retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: a new approach for the management of renal vascular pedicleBo Yuan0Yuantao Wang1Jialin Gao2Yongrui Zhang3Yaowen Fu4Wei An5Department of Urology, The First Hospital of Jilin UniversityDepartment of Urology, The First Hospital of Jilin UniversityDepartment of Urology, The First Hospital of Jilin UniversityDepartment of Urology, The First Hospital of Jilin UniversityDepartment of Urology, The First Hospital of Jilin UniversityDepartment of Urology, The First Hospital of Jilin UniversityAbstract Background The objective of this study was to examine the effectiveness and safety of lower pole (LP) approach in retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN). Methods One hundred thirty-two renal cancer patients were scheduled for selective retroperitoneal LRN. The surgery parameters and outcomes were compared. Out of 132 patients, 78 (59.1%) patients underwent LRN via LP approach, while 54 (40.9%) patients underwent LRN via lateroposterior space (LPS) approach. Results Compared to LPS group, the LP group had a higher body mass index (27.0 ± 1.7 kg/m2 vs. 24.5 ± 1.8 kg/m2, P < 0.0001) and a larger tumor size (6.9 ± 3.5 cm vs. 4.1 ± 3.3 cm, P < 0.0001). The LP approach reduced the volumes of blood loss and transfusion significantly (135.3 ± 17.2 mL vs. 219.6 ± 30.9 mL, P < 0.0001; 55.6 ± 28.3 vs. 141.1 ± 50.4 mL, P < 0.0001) as compared to the LPS approach. The LP approach also decreased the risk of conversion to open procedure (1.3 vs. 7.4%, P < 0.05). Conclusions The LP approach is an effective and safe alternative to the LPS approach for retroperitoneal LRN and might be more suitable for patients with obesity, large tumors, tumors located at the medial part of the kidney, or renal pedicular adhesion.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12957-018-1324-7Retroperitoneal laparoscopyRadical nephrectomyLower pole approachLateroposterior space approachEffectivenessSafety |
| spellingShingle | Bo Yuan Yuantao Wang Jialin Gao Yongrui Zhang Yaowen Fu Wei An Lower pole approach in retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: a new approach for the management of renal vascular pedicle Retroperitoneal laparoscopy Radical nephrectomy Lower pole approach Lateroposterior space approach Effectiveness Safety |
| title | Lower pole approach in retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: a new approach for the management of renal vascular pedicle |
| title_full | Lower pole approach in retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: a new approach for the management of renal vascular pedicle |
| title_fullStr | Lower pole approach in retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: a new approach for the management of renal vascular pedicle |
| title_full_unstemmed | Lower pole approach in retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: a new approach for the management of renal vascular pedicle |
| title_short | Lower pole approach in retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: a new approach for the management of renal vascular pedicle |
| title_sort | lower pole approach in retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy a new approach for the management of renal vascular pedicle |
| topic | Retroperitoneal laparoscopy Radical nephrectomy Lower pole approach Lateroposterior space approach Effectiveness Safety |
| url | http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12957-018-1324-7 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT boyuan lowerpoleapproachinretroperitoneallaparoscopicradicalnephrectomyanewapproachforthemanagementofrenalvascularpedicle AT yuantaowang lowerpoleapproachinretroperitoneallaparoscopicradicalnephrectomyanewapproachforthemanagementofrenalvascularpedicle AT jialingao lowerpoleapproachinretroperitoneallaparoscopicradicalnephrectomyanewapproachforthemanagementofrenalvascularpedicle AT yongruizhang lowerpoleapproachinretroperitoneallaparoscopicradicalnephrectomyanewapproachforthemanagementofrenalvascularpedicle AT yaowenfu lowerpoleapproachinretroperitoneallaparoscopicradicalnephrectomyanewapproachforthemanagementofrenalvascularpedicle AT weian lowerpoleapproachinretroperitoneallaparoscopicradicalnephrectomyanewapproachforthemanagementofrenalvascularpedicle |
