Lower pole approach in retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: a new approach for the management of renal vascular pedicle

Abstract Background The objective of this study was to examine the effectiveness and safety of lower pole (LP) approach in retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN). Methods One hundred thirty-two renal cancer patients were scheduled for selective retroperitoneal LRN. The surgery parame...

全面介绍

书目详细资料
发表在:World Journal of Surgical Oncology
Main Authors: Bo Yuan, Yuantao Wang, Jialin Gao, Yongrui Zhang, Yaowen Fu, Wei An
格式: 文件
语言:英语
出版: BMC 2018-02-01
主题:
在线阅读:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12957-018-1324-7
_version_ 1852776117810757632
author Bo Yuan
Yuantao Wang
Jialin Gao
Yongrui Zhang
Yaowen Fu
Wei An
author_facet Bo Yuan
Yuantao Wang
Jialin Gao
Yongrui Zhang
Yaowen Fu
Wei An
author_sort Bo Yuan
collection DOAJ
container_title World Journal of Surgical Oncology
description Abstract Background The objective of this study was to examine the effectiveness and safety of lower pole (LP) approach in retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN). Methods One hundred thirty-two renal cancer patients were scheduled for selective retroperitoneal LRN. The surgery parameters and outcomes were compared. Out of 132 patients, 78 (59.1%) patients underwent LRN via LP approach, while 54 (40.9%) patients underwent LRN via lateroposterior space (LPS) approach. Results Compared to LPS group, the LP group had a higher body mass index (27.0 ± 1.7 kg/m2 vs. 24.5 ± 1.8 kg/m2, P <  0.0001) and a larger tumor size (6.9 ± 3.5 cm vs. 4.1 ± 3.3 cm, P <  0.0001). The LP approach reduced the volumes of blood loss and transfusion significantly (135.3 ± 17.2 mL vs. 219.6 ± 30.9 mL, P <  0.0001; 55.6 ± 28.3 vs. 141.1 ± 50.4 mL, P <  0.0001) as compared to the LPS approach. The LP approach also decreased the risk of conversion to open procedure (1.3 vs. 7.4%, P <  0.05). Conclusions The LP approach is an effective and safe alternative to the LPS approach for retroperitoneal LRN and might be more suitable for patients with obesity, large tumors, tumors located at the medial part of the kidney, or renal pedicular adhesion.
format Article
id doaj-art-e7caed2f45f04b79b7d7aa47bde6aae8
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 1477-7819
language English
publishDate 2018-02-01
publisher BMC
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-e7caed2f45f04b79b7d7aa47bde6aae82025-08-19T20:49:57ZengBMCWorld Journal of Surgical Oncology1477-78192018-02-011611710.1186/s12957-018-1324-7Lower pole approach in retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: a new approach for the management of renal vascular pedicleBo Yuan0Yuantao Wang1Jialin Gao2Yongrui Zhang3Yaowen Fu4Wei An5Department of Urology, The First Hospital of Jilin UniversityDepartment of Urology, The First Hospital of Jilin UniversityDepartment of Urology, The First Hospital of Jilin UniversityDepartment of Urology, The First Hospital of Jilin UniversityDepartment of Urology, The First Hospital of Jilin UniversityDepartment of Urology, The First Hospital of Jilin UniversityAbstract Background The objective of this study was to examine the effectiveness and safety of lower pole (LP) approach in retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy (LRN). Methods One hundred thirty-two renal cancer patients were scheduled for selective retroperitoneal LRN. The surgery parameters and outcomes were compared. Out of 132 patients, 78 (59.1%) patients underwent LRN via LP approach, while 54 (40.9%) patients underwent LRN via lateroposterior space (LPS) approach. Results Compared to LPS group, the LP group had a higher body mass index (27.0 ± 1.7 kg/m2 vs. 24.5 ± 1.8 kg/m2, P <  0.0001) and a larger tumor size (6.9 ± 3.5 cm vs. 4.1 ± 3.3 cm, P <  0.0001). The LP approach reduced the volumes of blood loss and transfusion significantly (135.3 ± 17.2 mL vs. 219.6 ± 30.9 mL, P <  0.0001; 55.6 ± 28.3 vs. 141.1 ± 50.4 mL, P <  0.0001) as compared to the LPS approach. The LP approach also decreased the risk of conversion to open procedure (1.3 vs. 7.4%, P <  0.05). Conclusions The LP approach is an effective and safe alternative to the LPS approach for retroperitoneal LRN and might be more suitable for patients with obesity, large tumors, tumors located at the medial part of the kidney, or renal pedicular adhesion.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12957-018-1324-7Retroperitoneal laparoscopyRadical nephrectomyLower pole approachLateroposterior space approachEffectivenessSafety
spellingShingle Bo Yuan
Yuantao Wang
Jialin Gao
Yongrui Zhang
Yaowen Fu
Wei An
Lower pole approach in retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: a new approach for the management of renal vascular pedicle
Retroperitoneal laparoscopy
Radical nephrectomy
Lower pole approach
Lateroposterior space approach
Effectiveness
Safety
title Lower pole approach in retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: a new approach for the management of renal vascular pedicle
title_full Lower pole approach in retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: a new approach for the management of renal vascular pedicle
title_fullStr Lower pole approach in retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: a new approach for the management of renal vascular pedicle
title_full_unstemmed Lower pole approach in retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: a new approach for the management of renal vascular pedicle
title_short Lower pole approach in retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: a new approach for the management of renal vascular pedicle
title_sort lower pole approach in retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy a new approach for the management of renal vascular pedicle
topic Retroperitoneal laparoscopy
Radical nephrectomy
Lower pole approach
Lateroposterior space approach
Effectiveness
Safety
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12957-018-1324-7
work_keys_str_mv AT boyuan lowerpoleapproachinretroperitoneallaparoscopicradicalnephrectomyanewapproachforthemanagementofrenalvascularpedicle
AT yuantaowang lowerpoleapproachinretroperitoneallaparoscopicradicalnephrectomyanewapproachforthemanagementofrenalvascularpedicle
AT jialingao lowerpoleapproachinretroperitoneallaparoscopicradicalnephrectomyanewapproachforthemanagementofrenalvascularpedicle
AT yongruizhang lowerpoleapproachinretroperitoneallaparoscopicradicalnephrectomyanewapproachforthemanagementofrenalvascularpedicle
AT yaowenfu lowerpoleapproachinretroperitoneallaparoscopicradicalnephrectomyanewapproachforthemanagementofrenalvascularpedicle
AT weian lowerpoleapproachinretroperitoneallaparoscopicradicalnephrectomyanewapproachforthemanagementofrenalvascularpedicle