Evaluation of potential COVID-19 recurrence in patients with late repeat positive SARS-CoV-2 testing.

<h4>Background</h4>SARS-CoV-2 reinfection and reactivation has mostly been described in case reports. We therefore investigated the epidemiology of recurrent COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2.<h4>Methods</h4>Among patients testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 between March 11 and July 31, 2020...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:PLoS ONE
Main Authors: Ithan D Peltan, Sarah J Beesley, Brandon J Webb, Bert K Lopansri, Will Sinclair, Jason R Jacobs, Samuel M Brown
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2021-01-01
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251214
_version_ 1849515949126844416
author Ithan D Peltan
Sarah J Beesley
Brandon J Webb
Bert K Lopansri
Will Sinclair
Jason R Jacobs
Samuel M Brown
author_facet Ithan D Peltan
Sarah J Beesley
Brandon J Webb
Bert K Lopansri
Will Sinclair
Jason R Jacobs
Samuel M Brown
author_sort Ithan D Peltan
collection DOAJ
container_title PLoS ONE
description <h4>Background</h4>SARS-CoV-2 reinfection and reactivation has mostly been described in case reports. We therefore investigated the epidemiology of recurrent COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2.<h4>Methods</h4>Among patients testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 between March 11 and July 31, 2020 within an integrated healthcare system, we identified patients with a recurrent positive SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay ≥60 days after an initial positive test. To assign an overall likelihood of COVID-19 recurrence, we combined quantitative data from initial and recurrent positive RT-PCR cycle thresholds-a value inversely correlated with viral RNA burden- with a clinical recurrence likelihood assigned based on independent, standardized case review by two physicians. "Probable" or "possible" recurrence by clinical assessment was confirmed as the final recurrence likelihood only if a cycle threshold value obtained ≥60 days after initial testing was lower than its preceding cycle threshold or if the patient had an interval negative RT-PCR.<h4>Results</h4>Among 23,176 patients testing positive for SARS-CoV-2, 1,301 (5.6%) had at least one additional SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCRs assay ≥60 days later. Of 122 testing positive, 114 had sufficient data for evaluation. The median interval to the recurrent positive RT-PCR was 85.5 (IQR 74-107) days. After combining clinical and RT-PCR cycle threshold data, four patients (3.5%) met criteria for probable COVID-19 recurrence. All four exhibited symptoms at recurrence and three required a higher level of medical care compared to their initial diagnosis. After including six additional patients (5.3%) with possible recurrence, recurrence incidence was 4.3 (95% CI 2.1-7.9) cases per 10,000 COVID-19 patients.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Only 0.04% of all COVID-19 patients in our health system experienced probable or possible recurrence; 90% of repeat positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCRs were not consistent with true recurrence. Our pragmatic approach combining clinical and quantitative RT-PCR data could aid assessment of COVID-19 reinfection or reactivation by clinicians and public health personnel.
format Article
id doaj-art-e80b890f91c74354a01a2b4f53ee25ed
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 1932-6203
language English
publishDate 2021-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-e80b890f91c74354a01a2b4f53ee25ed2025-08-20T02:55:27ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-01165e025121410.1371/journal.pone.0251214Evaluation of potential COVID-19 recurrence in patients with late repeat positive SARS-CoV-2 testing.Ithan D PeltanSarah J BeesleyBrandon J WebbBert K LopansriWill SinclairJason R JacobsSamuel M Brown<h4>Background</h4>SARS-CoV-2 reinfection and reactivation has mostly been described in case reports. We therefore investigated the epidemiology of recurrent COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2.<h4>Methods</h4>Among patients testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 between March 11 and July 31, 2020 within an integrated healthcare system, we identified patients with a recurrent positive SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay ≥60 days after an initial positive test. To assign an overall likelihood of COVID-19 recurrence, we combined quantitative data from initial and recurrent positive RT-PCR cycle thresholds-a value inversely correlated with viral RNA burden- with a clinical recurrence likelihood assigned based on independent, standardized case review by two physicians. "Probable" or "possible" recurrence by clinical assessment was confirmed as the final recurrence likelihood only if a cycle threshold value obtained ≥60 days after initial testing was lower than its preceding cycle threshold or if the patient had an interval negative RT-PCR.<h4>Results</h4>Among 23,176 patients testing positive for SARS-CoV-2, 1,301 (5.6%) had at least one additional SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCRs assay ≥60 days later. Of 122 testing positive, 114 had sufficient data for evaluation. The median interval to the recurrent positive RT-PCR was 85.5 (IQR 74-107) days. After combining clinical and RT-PCR cycle threshold data, four patients (3.5%) met criteria for probable COVID-19 recurrence. All four exhibited symptoms at recurrence and three required a higher level of medical care compared to their initial diagnosis. After including six additional patients (5.3%) with possible recurrence, recurrence incidence was 4.3 (95% CI 2.1-7.9) cases per 10,000 COVID-19 patients.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Only 0.04% of all COVID-19 patients in our health system experienced probable or possible recurrence; 90% of repeat positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCRs were not consistent with true recurrence. Our pragmatic approach combining clinical and quantitative RT-PCR data could aid assessment of COVID-19 reinfection or reactivation by clinicians and public health personnel.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251214
spellingShingle Ithan D Peltan
Sarah J Beesley
Brandon J Webb
Bert K Lopansri
Will Sinclair
Jason R Jacobs
Samuel M Brown
Evaluation of potential COVID-19 recurrence in patients with late repeat positive SARS-CoV-2 testing.
title Evaluation of potential COVID-19 recurrence in patients with late repeat positive SARS-CoV-2 testing.
title_full Evaluation of potential COVID-19 recurrence in patients with late repeat positive SARS-CoV-2 testing.
title_fullStr Evaluation of potential COVID-19 recurrence in patients with late repeat positive SARS-CoV-2 testing.
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of potential COVID-19 recurrence in patients with late repeat positive SARS-CoV-2 testing.
title_short Evaluation of potential COVID-19 recurrence in patients with late repeat positive SARS-CoV-2 testing.
title_sort evaluation of potential covid 19 recurrence in patients with late repeat positive sars cov 2 testing
url https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251214
work_keys_str_mv AT ithandpeltan evaluationofpotentialcovid19recurrenceinpatientswithlaterepeatpositivesarscov2testing
AT sarahjbeesley evaluationofpotentialcovid19recurrenceinpatientswithlaterepeatpositivesarscov2testing
AT brandonjwebb evaluationofpotentialcovid19recurrenceinpatientswithlaterepeatpositivesarscov2testing
AT bertklopansri evaluationofpotentialcovid19recurrenceinpatientswithlaterepeatpositivesarscov2testing
AT willsinclair evaluationofpotentialcovid19recurrenceinpatientswithlaterepeatpositivesarscov2testing
AT jasonrjacobs evaluationofpotentialcovid19recurrenceinpatientswithlaterepeatpositivesarscov2testing
AT samuelmbrown evaluationofpotentialcovid19recurrenceinpatientswithlaterepeatpositivesarscov2testing