Evaluation of potential COVID-19 recurrence in patients with late repeat positive SARS-CoV-2 testing.
<h4>Background</h4>SARS-CoV-2 reinfection and reactivation has mostly been described in case reports. We therefore investigated the epidemiology of recurrent COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2.<h4>Methods</h4>Among patients testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 between March 11 and July 31, 2020...
| Published in: | PLoS ONE |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2021-01-01
|
| Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251214 |
| _version_ | 1849515949126844416 |
|---|---|
| author | Ithan D Peltan Sarah J Beesley Brandon J Webb Bert K Lopansri Will Sinclair Jason R Jacobs Samuel M Brown |
| author_facet | Ithan D Peltan Sarah J Beesley Brandon J Webb Bert K Lopansri Will Sinclair Jason R Jacobs Samuel M Brown |
| author_sort | Ithan D Peltan |
| collection | DOAJ |
| container_title | PLoS ONE |
| description | <h4>Background</h4>SARS-CoV-2 reinfection and reactivation has mostly been described in case reports. We therefore investigated the epidemiology of recurrent COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2.<h4>Methods</h4>Among patients testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 between March 11 and July 31, 2020 within an integrated healthcare system, we identified patients with a recurrent positive SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay ≥60 days after an initial positive test. To assign an overall likelihood of COVID-19 recurrence, we combined quantitative data from initial and recurrent positive RT-PCR cycle thresholds-a value inversely correlated with viral RNA burden- with a clinical recurrence likelihood assigned based on independent, standardized case review by two physicians. "Probable" or "possible" recurrence by clinical assessment was confirmed as the final recurrence likelihood only if a cycle threshold value obtained ≥60 days after initial testing was lower than its preceding cycle threshold or if the patient had an interval negative RT-PCR.<h4>Results</h4>Among 23,176 patients testing positive for SARS-CoV-2, 1,301 (5.6%) had at least one additional SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCRs assay ≥60 days later. Of 122 testing positive, 114 had sufficient data for evaluation. The median interval to the recurrent positive RT-PCR was 85.5 (IQR 74-107) days. After combining clinical and RT-PCR cycle threshold data, four patients (3.5%) met criteria for probable COVID-19 recurrence. All four exhibited symptoms at recurrence and three required a higher level of medical care compared to their initial diagnosis. After including six additional patients (5.3%) with possible recurrence, recurrence incidence was 4.3 (95% CI 2.1-7.9) cases per 10,000 COVID-19 patients.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Only 0.04% of all COVID-19 patients in our health system experienced probable or possible recurrence; 90% of repeat positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCRs were not consistent with true recurrence. Our pragmatic approach combining clinical and quantitative RT-PCR data could aid assessment of COVID-19 reinfection or reactivation by clinicians and public health personnel. |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e80b890f91c74354a01a2b4f53ee25ed |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2021-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| spelling | doaj-art-e80b890f91c74354a01a2b4f53ee25ed2025-08-20T02:55:27ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032021-01-01165e025121410.1371/journal.pone.0251214Evaluation of potential COVID-19 recurrence in patients with late repeat positive SARS-CoV-2 testing.Ithan D PeltanSarah J BeesleyBrandon J WebbBert K LopansriWill SinclairJason R JacobsSamuel M Brown<h4>Background</h4>SARS-CoV-2 reinfection and reactivation has mostly been described in case reports. We therefore investigated the epidemiology of recurrent COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2.<h4>Methods</h4>Among patients testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 between March 11 and July 31, 2020 within an integrated healthcare system, we identified patients with a recurrent positive SARS-CoV-2 reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay ≥60 days after an initial positive test. To assign an overall likelihood of COVID-19 recurrence, we combined quantitative data from initial and recurrent positive RT-PCR cycle thresholds-a value inversely correlated with viral RNA burden- with a clinical recurrence likelihood assigned based on independent, standardized case review by two physicians. "Probable" or "possible" recurrence by clinical assessment was confirmed as the final recurrence likelihood only if a cycle threshold value obtained ≥60 days after initial testing was lower than its preceding cycle threshold or if the patient had an interval negative RT-PCR.<h4>Results</h4>Among 23,176 patients testing positive for SARS-CoV-2, 1,301 (5.6%) had at least one additional SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCRs assay ≥60 days later. Of 122 testing positive, 114 had sufficient data for evaluation. The median interval to the recurrent positive RT-PCR was 85.5 (IQR 74-107) days. After combining clinical and RT-PCR cycle threshold data, four patients (3.5%) met criteria for probable COVID-19 recurrence. All four exhibited symptoms at recurrence and three required a higher level of medical care compared to their initial diagnosis. After including six additional patients (5.3%) with possible recurrence, recurrence incidence was 4.3 (95% CI 2.1-7.9) cases per 10,000 COVID-19 patients.<h4>Conclusions</h4>Only 0.04% of all COVID-19 patients in our health system experienced probable or possible recurrence; 90% of repeat positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCRs were not consistent with true recurrence. Our pragmatic approach combining clinical and quantitative RT-PCR data could aid assessment of COVID-19 reinfection or reactivation by clinicians and public health personnel.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251214 |
| spellingShingle | Ithan D Peltan Sarah J Beesley Brandon J Webb Bert K Lopansri Will Sinclair Jason R Jacobs Samuel M Brown Evaluation of potential COVID-19 recurrence in patients with late repeat positive SARS-CoV-2 testing. |
| title | Evaluation of potential COVID-19 recurrence in patients with late repeat positive SARS-CoV-2 testing. |
| title_full | Evaluation of potential COVID-19 recurrence in patients with late repeat positive SARS-CoV-2 testing. |
| title_fullStr | Evaluation of potential COVID-19 recurrence in patients with late repeat positive SARS-CoV-2 testing. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of potential COVID-19 recurrence in patients with late repeat positive SARS-CoV-2 testing. |
| title_short | Evaluation of potential COVID-19 recurrence in patients with late repeat positive SARS-CoV-2 testing. |
| title_sort | evaluation of potential covid 19 recurrence in patients with late repeat positive sars cov 2 testing |
| url | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251214 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT ithandpeltan evaluationofpotentialcovid19recurrenceinpatientswithlaterepeatpositivesarscov2testing AT sarahjbeesley evaluationofpotentialcovid19recurrenceinpatientswithlaterepeatpositivesarscov2testing AT brandonjwebb evaluationofpotentialcovid19recurrenceinpatientswithlaterepeatpositivesarscov2testing AT bertklopansri evaluationofpotentialcovid19recurrenceinpatientswithlaterepeatpositivesarscov2testing AT willsinclair evaluationofpotentialcovid19recurrenceinpatientswithlaterepeatpositivesarscov2testing AT jasonrjacobs evaluationofpotentialcovid19recurrenceinpatientswithlaterepeatpositivesarscov2testing AT samuelmbrown evaluationofpotentialcovid19recurrenceinpatientswithlaterepeatpositivesarscov2testing |
