Wildfire risk governance from the bottom up: linking local planning processes in fragmented landscapes

The growing scale of natural hazards highlights the need for models of governance capable of addressing risk across administrative boundaries. However, risk governance systems are often fragmented, decentralized, and sustained by informal linkages among local-level risk mitigation planning processes...

وصف كامل

التفاصيل البيبلوغرافية
الحاوية / القاعدة:Ecology and Society
المؤلفون الرئيسيون: Matthew Hamilton, Max Nielsen-Pincus, Cody R Evers
التنسيق: مقال
اللغة:الإنجليزية
منشور في: Resilience Alliance 2023-09-01
الموضوعات:
الوصول للمادة أونلاين:https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol28/iss3/art3
_version_ 1852784215386488832
author Matthew Hamilton
Max Nielsen-Pincus
Cody R Evers
author_facet Matthew Hamilton
Max Nielsen-Pincus
Cody R Evers
author_sort Matthew Hamilton
collection DOAJ
container_title Ecology and Society
description The growing scale of natural hazards highlights the need for models of governance capable of addressing risk across administrative boundaries. However, risk governance systems are often fragmented, decentralized, and sustained by informal linkages among local-level risk mitigation planning processes. Improving resilience to the effects of environmental change requires a better understanding of factors that contribute to these linkages. Using data on the patterns of participation of 10,199 individual stakeholders in 837 community wildfire protection plans (CWPPs) within the western U.S., we document the emergence of a locally clustered but spatially extensive wildfire risk governance network. Our evaluation of factors that contribute to connectivity within this network indicates that risk interdependence (e.g., joint exposure to the same fires) between planning jurisdictions increases the prospects for linkages between planning processes, and that connectivity is also more likely among planning processes that are more proximate and similar to one another. We discuss how our results advance understanding of how changing hazard conditions prompt risk mitigation policy networks to reorganize, which in turn affects risk outcomes at multiple spatial scales.
format Article
id doaj-art-e83979ed9c4044579cf06cb95f7cc623
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 1708-3087
language English
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher Resilience Alliance
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-e83979ed9c4044579cf06cb95f7cc6232025-08-19T20:46:40ZengResilience AllianceEcology and Society1708-30872023-09-01283310.5751/ES-13856-28030313856Wildfire risk governance from the bottom up: linking local planning processes in fragmented landscapesMatthew Hamilton0Max Nielsen-Pincus1Cody R Evers2School of Environment and Natural Resources, The Ohio State UniversityDepartment of Environmental Science and Management, Portland State UniversityDepartment of Environmental Science and Management, Portland State UniversityThe growing scale of natural hazards highlights the need for models of governance capable of addressing risk across administrative boundaries. However, risk governance systems are often fragmented, decentralized, and sustained by informal linkages among local-level risk mitigation planning processes. Improving resilience to the effects of environmental change requires a better understanding of factors that contribute to these linkages. Using data on the patterns of participation of 10,199 individual stakeholders in 837 community wildfire protection plans (CWPPs) within the western U.S., we document the emergence of a locally clustered but spatially extensive wildfire risk governance network. Our evaluation of factors that contribute to connectivity within this network indicates that risk interdependence (e.g., joint exposure to the same fires) between planning jurisdictions increases the prospects for linkages between planning processes, and that connectivity is also more likely among planning processes that are more proximate and similar to one another. We discuss how our results advance understanding of how changing hazard conditions prompt risk mitigation policy networks to reorganize, which in turn affects risk outcomes at multiple spatial scales.https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol28/iss3/art3community wildfire protection planspolycentricityrisk governance networkswildfire risk
spellingShingle Matthew Hamilton
Max Nielsen-Pincus
Cody R Evers
Wildfire risk governance from the bottom up: linking local planning processes in fragmented landscapes
community wildfire protection plans
polycentricity
risk governance networks
wildfire risk
title Wildfire risk governance from the bottom up: linking local planning processes in fragmented landscapes
title_full Wildfire risk governance from the bottom up: linking local planning processes in fragmented landscapes
title_fullStr Wildfire risk governance from the bottom up: linking local planning processes in fragmented landscapes
title_full_unstemmed Wildfire risk governance from the bottom up: linking local planning processes in fragmented landscapes
title_short Wildfire risk governance from the bottom up: linking local planning processes in fragmented landscapes
title_sort wildfire risk governance from the bottom up linking local planning processes in fragmented landscapes
topic community wildfire protection plans
polycentricity
risk governance networks
wildfire risk
url https://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol28/iss3/art3
work_keys_str_mv AT matthewhamilton wildfireriskgovernancefromthebottomuplinkinglocalplanningprocessesinfragmentedlandscapes
AT maxnielsenpincus wildfireriskgovernancefromthebottomuplinkinglocalplanningprocessesinfragmentedlandscapes
AT codyrevers wildfireriskgovernancefromthebottomuplinkinglocalplanningprocessesinfragmentedlandscapes