Comparison of the Trapping Efficacy of Locally Modified Gravid <i>Aedes</i> Trap and Autocidal Gravid Ovitrap for the Monitoring and Surveillance of <i>Aedes aegypti</i> Mosquitoes in Tanzania
The study assessed the trapping efficacy of locally modified (1) Gravid Aedes Trap (GAT) lined with insecticide-treated net (ITN) as a killing agent and (2) Autocidal Gravid Ovitrap (AGO) with sticky board in the semi-field system (SFS) and field setting. Fully balanced Latin square experiments were...
| Published in: | Insects |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2024-05-01
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/15/6/401 |
| _version_ | 1850307406575173632 |
|---|---|
| author | Jane Johnson Machange Masudi Suleiman Maasayi John Mundi Jason Moore Joseph Barnabas Muganga Olukayode G. Odufuwa Sarah J. Moore Frank Chelestino Tenywa |
| author_facet | Jane Johnson Machange Masudi Suleiman Maasayi John Mundi Jason Moore Joseph Barnabas Muganga Olukayode G. Odufuwa Sarah J. Moore Frank Chelestino Tenywa |
| author_sort | Jane Johnson Machange |
| collection | DOAJ |
| container_title | Insects |
| description | The study assessed the trapping efficacy of locally modified (1) Gravid Aedes Trap (GAT) lined with insecticide-treated net (ITN) as a killing agent and (2) Autocidal Gravid Ovitrap (AGO) with sticky board in the semi-field system (SFS) and field setting. Fully balanced Latin square experiments were conducted to compare GAT lined with ITN vs. AGO, both with either yeast or grass infusion. Biogent-Sentinel (BGS) with BG-Lure and no CO<sub>2</sub> was used as a standard trap for <i>Aedes</i> mosquitoes. In the SFS, GAT outperformed AGO in collecting both nulliparous (65% vs. 49%, OR = 2.22, [95% CI: 1.89–2.60], <i>p</i> < 0.001) and gravid mosquitoes (73% vs. 64%, OR = 1.67, [95% CI: 1.41–1.97], <i>p</i> < 0.001). Similar differences were observed in the field. Yeast and grass infusion did not significantly differ in trapping gravid mosquitoes (OR = 0.91, [95% CI: 0.77–1.07], <i>p</i> = 0.250). The use of ITN improved mosquito recapture from 11% to 70% in the SFS. The same trend was observed in the field. Yeast was chosen for further evaluation in the optimized GAT due to its convenience and bifenthrin net for its resistance management properties. Mosquito density was collected when using 4× GATs relative to BGS-captured gravid mosquitoes 64 vs. 58 (IRR = 0.82, [95% CI: 0.35–1.95], <i>p</i> = 0.658) and showed no density dependence. Deployment of multiple yeast-baited GAT lined with bifenthrin net is cost-effective (single GAT < $8) compared to other traps such as BGS ($160). |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj-art-e84b6c2abf034ab1b501edf0b785011e |
| institution | Directory of Open Access Journals |
| issn | 2075-4450 |
| language | English |
| publishDate | 2024-05-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| spelling | doaj-art-e84b6c2abf034ab1b501edf0b785011e2025-08-19T23:28:42ZengMDPI AGInsects2075-44502024-05-0115640110.3390/insects15060401Comparison of the Trapping Efficacy of Locally Modified Gravid <i>Aedes</i> Trap and Autocidal Gravid Ovitrap for the Monitoring and Surveillance of <i>Aedes aegypti</i> Mosquitoes in TanzaniaJane Johnson Machange0Masudi Suleiman Maasayi1John Mundi2Jason Moore3Joseph Barnabas Muganga4Olukayode G. Odufuwa5Sarah J. Moore6Frank Chelestino Tenywa7School of Life Sciences and Bio-Engineering, The Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology (NM-AIST), Tengeru P.O. Box 447, TanzaniaSchool of Life Sciences and Bio-Engineering, The Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology (NM-AIST), Tengeru P.O. Box 447, TanzaniaVector Control Product Testing Unit, Environmental Health and Ecological Science Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo P.O. Box 74, TanzaniaVector Control Product Testing Unit, Environmental Health and Ecological Science Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo P.O. Box 74, TanzaniaVector Control Product Testing Unit, Environmental Health and Ecological Science Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo P.O. Box 74, TanzaniaVector Control Product Testing Unit, Environmental Health and Ecological Science Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo P.O. Box 74, TanzaniaSchool of Life Sciences and Bio-Engineering, The Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology (NM-AIST), Tengeru P.O. Box 447, TanzaniaVector Control Product Testing Unit, Environmental Health and Ecological Science Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo P.O. Box 74, TanzaniaThe study assessed the trapping efficacy of locally modified (1) Gravid Aedes Trap (GAT) lined with insecticide-treated net (ITN) as a killing agent and (2) Autocidal Gravid Ovitrap (AGO) with sticky board in the semi-field system (SFS) and field setting. Fully balanced Latin square experiments were conducted to compare GAT lined with ITN vs. AGO, both with either yeast or grass infusion. Biogent-Sentinel (BGS) with BG-Lure and no CO<sub>2</sub> was used as a standard trap for <i>Aedes</i> mosquitoes. In the SFS, GAT outperformed AGO in collecting both nulliparous (65% vs. 49%, OR = 2.22, [95% CI: 1.89–2.60], <i>p</i> < 0.001) and gravid mosquitoes (73% vs. 64%, OR = 1.67, [95% CI: 1.41–1.97], <i>p</i> < 0.001). Similar differences were observed in the field. Yeast and grass infusion did not significantly differ in trapping gravid mosquitoes (OR = 0.91, [95% CI: 0.77–1.07], <i>p</i> = 0.250). The use of ITN improved mosquito recapture from 11% to 70% in the SFS. The same trend was observed in the field. Yeast was chosen for further evaluation in the optimized GAT due to its convenience and bifenthrin net for its resistance management properties. Mosquito density was collected when using 4× GATs relative to BGS-captured gravid mosquitoes 64 vs. 58 (IRR = 0.82, [95% CI: 0.35–1.95], <i>p</i> = 0.658) and showed no density dependence. Deployment of multiple yeast-baited GAT lined with bifenthrin net is cost-effective (single GAT < $8) compared to other traps such as BGS ($160).https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/15/6/401<i>Aedes aegypti</i>mosquito trapsvector controlBiogent Sentinel trapGravid <i>Aedes</i> Trapautocidal gravid ovitrap |
| spellingShingle | Jane Johnson Machange Masudi Suleiman Maasayi John Mundi Jason Moore Joseph Barnabas Muganga Olukayode G. Odufuwa Sarah J. Moore Frank Chelestino Tenywa Comparison of the Trapping Efficacy of Locally Modified Gravid <i>Aedes</i> Trap and Autocidal Gravid Ovitrap for the Monitoring and Surveillance of <i>Aedes aegypti</i> Mosquitoes in Tanzania <i>Aedes aegypti</i> mosquito traps vector control Biogent Sentinel trap Gravid <i>Aedes</i> Trap autocidal gravid ovitrap |
| title | Comparison of the Trapping Efficacy of Locally Modified Gravid <i>Aedes</i> Trap and Autocidal Gravid Ovitrap for the Monitoring and Surveillance of <i>Aedes aegypti</i> Mosquitoes in Tanzania |
| title_full | Comparison of the Trapping Efficacy of Locally Modified Gravid <i>Aedes</i> Trap and Autocidal Gravid Ovitrap for the Monitoring and Surveillance of <i>Aedes aegypti</i> Mosquitoes in Tanzania |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of the Trapping Efficacy of Locally Modified Gravid <i>Aedes</i> Trap and Autocidal Gravid Ovitrap for the Monitoring and Surveillance of <i>Aedes aegypti</i> Mosquitoes in Tanzania |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the Trapping Efficacy of Locally Modified Gravid <i>Aedes</i> Trap and Autocidal Gravid Ovitrap for the Monitoring and Surveillance of <i>Aedes aegypti</i> Mosquitoes in Tanzania |
| title_short | Comparison of the Trapping Efficacy of Locally Modified Gravid <i>Aedes</i> Trap and Autocidal Gravid Ovitrap for the Monitoring and Surveillance of <i>Aedes aegypti</i> Mosquitoes in Tanzania |
| title_sort | comparison of the trapping efficacy of locally modified gravid i aedes i trap and autocidal gravid ovitrap for the monitoring and surveillance of i aedes aegypti i mosquitoes in tanzania |
| topic | <i>Aedes aegypti</i> mosquito traps vector control Biogent Sentinel trap Gravid <i>Aedes</i> Trap autocidal gravid ovitrap |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/15/6/401 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT janejohnsonmachange comparisonofthetrappingefficacyoflocallymodifiedgravidiaedesitrapandautocidalgravidovitrapforthemonitoringandsurveillanceofiaedesaegyptiimosquitoesintanzania AT masudisuleimanmaasayi comparisonofthetrappingefficacyoflocallymodifiedgravidiaedesitrapandautocidalgravidovitrapforthemonitoringandsurveillanceofiaedesaegyptiimosquitoesintanzania AT johnmundi comparisonofthetrappingefficacyoflocallymodifiedgravidiaedesitrapandautocidalgravidovitrapforthemonitoringandsurveillanceofiaedesaegyptiimosquitoesintanzania AT jasonmoore comparisonofthetrappingefficacyoflocallymodifiedgravidiaedesitrapandautocidalgravidovitrapforthemonitoringandsurveillanceofiaedesaegyptiimosquitoesintanzania AT josephbarnabasmuganga comparisonofthetrappingefficacyoflocallymodifiedgravidiaedesitrapandautocidalgravidovitrapforthemonitoringandsurveillanceofiaedesaegyptiimosquitoesintanzania AT olukayodegodufuwa comparisonofthetrappingefficacyoflocallymodifiedgravidiaedesitrapandautocidalgravidovitrapforthemonitoringandsurveillanceofiaedesaegyptiimosquitoesintanzania AT sarahjmoore comparisonofthetrappingefficacyoflocallymodifiedgravidiaedesitrapandautocidalgravidovitrapforthemonitoringandsurveillanceofiaedesaegyptiimosquitoesintanzania AT frankchelestinotenywa comparisonofthetrappingefficacyoflocallymodifiedgravidiaedesitrapandautocidalgravidovitrapforthemonitoringandsurveillanceofiaedesaegyptiimosquitoesintanzania |
