Comparison of the Trapping Efficacy of Locally Modified Gravid <i>Aedes</i> Trap and Autocidal Gravid Ovitrap for the Monitoring and Surveillance of <i>Aedes aegypti</i> Mosquitoes in Tanzania

The study assessed the trapping efficacy of locally modified (1) Gravid Aedes Trap (GAT) lined with insecticide-treated net (ITN) as a killing agent and (2) Autocidal Gravid Ovitrap (AGO) with sticky board in the semi-field system (SFS) and field setting. Fully balanced Latin square experiments were...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Insects
Main Authors: Jane Johnson Machange, Masudi Suleiman Maasayi, John Mundi, Jason Moore, Joseph Barnabas Muganga, Olukayode G. Odufuwa, Sarah J. Moore, Frank Chelestino Tenywa
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-05-01
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/15/6/401
_version_ 1850307406575173632
author Jane Johnson Machange
Masudi Suleiman Maasayi
John Mundi
Jason Moore
Joseph Barnabas Muganga
Olukayode G. Odufuwa
Sarah J. Moore
Frank Chelestino Tenywa
author_facet Jane Johnson Machange
Masudi Suleiman Maasayi
John Mundi
Jason Moore
Joseph Barnabas Muganga
Olukayode G. Odufuwa
Sarah J. Moore
Frank Chelestino Tenywa
author_sort Jane Johnson Machange
collection DOAJ
container_title Insects
description The study assessed the trapping efficacy of locally modified (1) Gravid Aedes Trap (GAT) lined with insecticide-treated net (ITN) as a killing agent and (2) Autocidal Gravid Ovitrap (AGO) with sticky board in the semi-field system (SFS) and field setting. Fully balanced Latin square experiments were conducted to compare GAT lined with ITN vs. AGO, both with either yeast or grass infusion. Biogent-Sentinel (BGS) with BG-Lure and no CO<sub>2</sub> was used as a standard trap for <i>Aedes</i> mosquitoes. In the SFS, GAT outperformed AGO in collecting both nulliparous (65% vs. 49%, OR = 2.22, [95% CI: 1.89–2.60], <i>p</i> < 0.001) and gravid mosquitoes (73% vs. 64%, OR = 1.67, [95% CI: 1.41–1.97], <i>p</i> < 0.001). Similar differences were observed in the field. Yeast and grass infusion did not significantly differ in trapping gravid mosquitoes (OR = 0.91, [95% CI: 0.77–1.07], <i>p</i> = 0.250). The use of ITN improved mosquito recapture from 11% to 70% in the SFS. The same trend was observed in the field. Yeast was chosen for further evaluation in the optimized GAT due to its convenience and bifenthrin net for its resistance management properties. Mosquito density was collected when using 4× GATs relative to BGS-captured gravid mosquitoes 64 vs. 58 (IRR = 0.82, [95% CI: 0.35–1.95], <i>p</i> = 0.658) and showed no density dependence. Deployment of multiple yeast-baited GAT lined with bifenthrin net is cost-effective (single GAT < $8) compared to other traps such as BGS ($160).
format Article
id doaj-art-e84b6c2abf034ab1b501edf0b785011e
institution Directory of Open Access Journals
issn 2075-4450
language English
publishDate 2024-05-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
spelling doaj-art-e84b6c2abf034ab1b501edf0b785011e2025-08-19T23:28:42ZengMDPI AGInsects2075-44502024-05-0115640110.3390/insects15060401Comparison of the Trapping Efficacy of Locally Modified Gravid <i>Aedes</i> Trap and Autocidal Gravid Ovitrap for the Monitoring and Surveillance of <i>Aedes aegypti</i> Mosquitoes in TanzaniaJane Johnson Machange0Masudi Suleiman Maasayi1John Mundi2Jason Moore3Joseph Barnabas Muganga4Olukayode G. Odufuwa5Sarah J. Moore6Frank Chelestino Tenywa7School of Life Sciences and Bio-Engineering, The Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology (NM-AIST), Tengeru P.O. Box 447, TanzaniaSchool of Life Sciences and Bio-Engineering, The Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology (NM-AIST), Tengeru P.O. Box 447, TanzaniaVector Control Product Testing Unit, Environmental Health and Ecological Science Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo P.O. Box 74, TanzaniaVector Control Product Testing Unit, Environmental Health and Ecological Science Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo P.O. Box 74, TanzaniaVector Control Product Testing Unit, Environmental Health and Ecological Science Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo P.O. Box 74, TanzaniaVector Control Product Testing Unit, Environmental Health and Ecological Science Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo P.O. Box 74, TanzaniaSchool of Life Sciences and Bio-Engineering, The Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology (NM-AIST), Tengeru P.O. Box 447, TanzaniaVector Control Product Testing Unit, Environmental Health and Ecological Science Department, Ifakara Health Institute, Bagamoyo P.O. Box 74, TanzaniaThe study assessed the trapping efficacy of locally modified (1) Gravid Aedes Trap (GAT) lined with insecticide-treated net (ITN) as a killing agent and (2) Autocidal Gravid Ovitrap (AGO) with sticky board in the semi-field system (SFS) and field setting. Fully balanced Latin square experiments were conducted to compare GAT lined with ITN vs. AGO, both with either yeast or grass infusion. Biogent-Sentinel (BGS) with BG-Lure and no CO<sub>2</sub> was used as a standard trap for <i>Aedes</i> mosquitoes. In the SFS, GAT outperformed AGO in collecting both nulliparous (65% vs. 49%, OR = 2.22, [95% CI: 1.89–2.60], <i>p</i> < 0.001) and gravid mosquitoes (73% vs. 64%, OR = 1.67, [95% CI: 1.41–1.97], <i>p</i> < 0.001). Similar differences were observed in the field. Yeast and grass infusion did not significantly differ in trapping gravid mosquitoes (OR = 0.91, [95% CI: 0.77–1.07], <i>p</i> = 0.250). The use of ITN improved mosquito recapture from 11% to 70% in the SFS. The same trend was observed in the field. Yeast was chosen for further evaluation in the optimized GAT due to its convenience and bifenthrin net for its resistance management properties. Mosquito density was collected when using 4× GATs relative to BGS-captured gravid mosquitoes 64 vs. 58 (IRR = 0.82, [95% CI: 0.35–1.95], <i>p</i> = 0.658) and showed no density dependence. Deployment of multiple yeast-baited GAT lined with bifenthrin net is cost-effective (single GAT < $8) compared to other traps such as BGS ($160).https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/15/6/401<i>Aedes aegypti</i>mosquito trapsvector controlBiogent Sentinel trapGravid <i>Aedes</i> Trapautocidal gravid ovitrap
spellingShingle Jane Johnson Machange
Masudi Suleiman Maasayi
John Mundi
Jason Moore
Joseph Barnabas Muganga
Olukayode G. Odufuwa
Sarah J. Moore
Frank Chelestino Tenywa
Comparison of the Trapping Efficacy of Locally Modified Gravid <i>Aedes</i> Trap and Autocidal Gravid Ovitrap for the Monitoring and Surveillance of <i>Aedes aegypti</i> Mosquitoes in Tanzania
<i>Aedes aegypti</i>
mosquito traps
vector control
Biogent Sentinel trap
Gravid <i>Aedes</i> Trap
autocidal gravid ovitrap
title Comparison of the Trapping Efficacy of Locally Modified Gravid <i>Aedes</i> Trap and Autocidal Gravid Ovitrap for the Monitoring and Surveillance of <i>Aedes aegypti</i> Mosquitoes in Tanzania
title_full Comparison of the Trapping Efficacy of Locally Modified Gravid <i>Aedes</i> Trap and Autocidal Gravid Ovitrap for the Monitoring and Surveillance of <i>Aedes aegypti</i> Mosquitoes in Tanzania
title_fullStr Comparison of the Trapping Efficacy of Locally Modified Gravid <i>Aedes</i> Trap and Autocidal Gravid Ovitrap for the Monitoring and Surveillance of <i>Aedes aegypti</i> Mosquitoes in Tanzania
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the Trapping Efficacy of Locally Modified Gravid <i>Aedes</i> Trap and Autocidal Gravid Ovitrap for the Monitoring and Surveillance of <i>Aedes aegypti</i> Mosquitoes in Tanzania
title_short Comparison of the Trapping Efficacy of Locally Modified Gravid <i>Aedes</i> Trap and Autocidal Gravid Ovitrap for the Monitoring and Surveillance of <i>Aedes aegypti</i> Mosquitoes in Tanzania
title_sort comparison of the trapping efficacy of locally modified gravid i aedes i trap and autocidal gravid ovitrap for the monitoring and surveillance of i aedes aegypti i mosquitoes in tanzania
topic <i>Aedes aegypti</i>
mosquito traps
vector control
Biogent Sentinel trap
Gravid <i>Aedes</i> Trap
autocidal gravid ovitrap
url https://www.mdpi.com/2075-4450/15/6/401
work_keys_str_mv AT janejohnsonmachange comparisonofthetrappingefficacyoflocallymodifiedgravidiaedesitrapandautocidalgravidovitrapforthemonitoringandsurveillanceofiaedesaegyptiimosquitoesintanzania
AT masudisuleimanmaasayi comparisonofthetrappingefficacyoflocallymodifiedgravidiaedesitrapandautocidalgravidovitrapforthemonitoringandsurveillanceofiaedesaegyptiimosquitoesintanzania
AT johnmundi comparisonofthetrappingefficacyoflocallymodifiedgravidiaedesitrapandautocidalgravidovitrapforthemonitoringandsurveillanceofiaedesaegyptiimosquitoesintanzania
AT jasonmoore comparisonofthetrappingefficacyoflocallymodifiedgravidiaedesitrapandautocidalgravidovitrapforthemonitoringandsurveillanceofiaedesaegyptiimosquitoesintanzania
AT josephbarnabasmuganga comparisonofthetrappingefficacyoflocallymodifiedgravidiaedesitrapandautocidalgravidovitrapforthemonitoringandsurveillanceofiaedesaegyptiimosquitoesintanzania
AT olukayodegodufuwa comparisonofthetrappingefficacyoflocallymodifiedgravidiaedesitrapandautocidalgravidovitrapforthemonitoringandsurveillanceofiaedesaegyptiimosquitoesintanzania
AT sarahjmoore comparisonofthetrappingefficacyoflocallymodifiedgravidiaedesitrapandautocidalgravidovitrapforthemonitoringandsurveillanceofiaedesaegyptiimosquitoesintanzania
AT frankchelestinotenywa comparisonofthetrappingefficacyoflocallymodifiedgravidiaedesitrapandautocidalgravidovitrapforthemonitoringandsurveillanceofiaedesaegyptiimosquitoesintanzania